Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T01:31:11.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descriptions of Some Phytoseiide Mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Nine New Species from British Columbia with Keys to the Species of British Columbia. Part II. Redescriptions of Eight Species Described by Berlese1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. A. Chant
D. A. Chant
Affiliation:
Entomology Laboratory, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1951 to 1955 Mr. N. H. Anderson of the Belleville laboratory, and Mr. C. V. G. Morgan, Entomology Laboratory, Summerland, B.C., collected plant material in southern British Columbia to investigate the distribution there of phytoseiid mites. Many phytoseiids in this material were apparently undescribed, and in 1956 the author collected further specimens. Nine undescribed forms were found; descriptions of these are given below, with a key for identifying the adult females of all phytoseiid species known to occur in British Columbia. The new species all are of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1957, as defined by Chant (in preparation). The mites were cleared in chloral hydrate or lactic acid and mointed in Berlese's fluid; but some were mounted directly in De Faure's fluid. The measurements given are of the greatest lengths and widths of the dorsal and ventri-anal shields, and whenever possible are the means for 10 specimens. The setal terminology of Garman (1948) and Nesbitt (1951) is followed. All specimens referred to were collected in British Columbia unless otherwise stated.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 89 , Issue 7 , July 1957 , pp. 289 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlese, A. 1914. Acari nuovi. Redia 10: 113–150.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1955. Notes on the mites of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 (Acarina: Laelaptidae), with descriptions of the males of some species and the female of a new species. Canadian Ent. 87: 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A. In preparation. Note on the status of some genera in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina): Laelaptidae).Google Scholar
Cunliffe, F., and Baker, E. W.. 1953. A guide to the predatory phytoseiid mites of the United States. Pinellas Biol. Lab. Pub. No. 1.Google Scholar
Garman, P. 1948. Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Connecticut Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. No. 520.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. 1839. Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden. Regensburg.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predacious upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zool. Verb. 12.Google Scholar
Scheuten, A. 1857. Einiges über Milben. Arch. Naturgesch. 23: 104–112.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1954. Species of the subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from Australia. Australian J. Zool. 2: 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar