Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T20:33:44.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FACTORS DETERMINING LEVELS OF PARASITISM BY WINTHEMIA RUFOPICTA (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE), WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO HELIOTHIS SPP. (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) AS HOSTS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. V. Danks
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh

Abstract

Short-term interactions of the polyphagous tachinid Winthemia rufopicta (Big.) with its hosts, especially Heliothis zea (Boddie) and H. virescens (Fab.), are considered.

Within a given host species, interacting factors fall into three groups: (1) factors that have little influence on parasite oviposition, or cause little parasite mortality (host responses to ovipositing parasites, previous parasitism, firmness of attachment of eggs and, in the populations studied here, direct competition with other insect parasites); (2) factors that may account for significant limitation of oviposition (habitat, diel activity, and seasonal occurrence of a given host, and species preference of the parasite) or that cause significant parasite mortality (destruction by the host and other mortality of hatching maggots, which in turn depends partly on the position of eggs on the host): and (3) factors that can vary widely in a given host species and are therefore of great potential importance. These are: (a) host feeding behaviour—initial parasitism of H. zea, for example, varies from negligible levels for larvae concealed in corn ears to sometimes very high levels for larvae feeding openly on tobacco leaves; (b) host size—smaller larvae (especially penultimate compared with final instars) receive fewer ovipositions, and fewer eggs per oviposition; (c) host moulting—surface-deposited eggs are lost if the host moults before they hatch, but the rate of moulting varies with instar and foodplant, and interacts differently with parasite egg incubation times at different temperatures (most eggs are lost except in final instars); (d) intraspecific competition—depends on parasite and host densities, but reaches the highest levels in the fall; (e) competition with host pathogens—parasites may be killed during development if the host dies from pathogens.

For different hosts, family, size, surface quality, and spatial and temporal availability are known to have divergent influences on the levels of parasitism, but many other interactions are probably important.

The interpretation of records of total or of successful parasitism in host samples is considered—behavioural, developmental, and numerical interactions may make conclusions drawn from such records unreliable. In particular, levels of parasitism may change very rapidly as host or parasite populations develop; laboratory rearing may distort recorded levels of successful parasitism; and the proportion of attacked hosts that produce parasites, and the number of parasites produced by each host, normally varies directly with the number of eggs per host even when this is large.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adam, D. S. and Watson, T. F.. 1971. Adult biology of Exorista mella. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 146149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhmedov, R. M. 1971. Diurnal rhythm of nutrition of caterpillars Agrotis ipsilon Rott. and A. exclamationis L. under laboratory and natural conditions. (In Russian, English summary.) Vestn. Zool. 5: 7276.Google Scholar
Allen, H. W. 1925. Biology of the red-tailed tachina fly, Winthemia quadripustulata Fabr. Miss. agric. Exp. Stn Tech. Bull. 12.Google Scholar
Allen, H. W. 1926 a. Notes on some North American species of Achaetoneura, with a description of one new species (Diptera: Tachinidae). Am. ent. Soc. Trans. 52: 187198.Google Scholar
Allen, H. W. 1926 b. Life history of the variegated cutworm tachina fly, Archytas analis. J. agric. Res. 32: 417435.Google Scholar
Anon. 1972. Distribution, abundance and control of Heliothis species in cotton and other host plants. Southern Coop. Ser. Bull. 169.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. L. and Chada, H. L.. 1968. Effects of natural (sorghum) and artificial (wheat germ) diets on development of the corn earworm, fall army worm and southwestern corn borer. J. econ. Ent. 61: 257260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, A. B. 1923. Some notes on the natural control of the larch sawfly and larch casebearer in New Brunswick in 1922. Proc. Acadian ent. Soc. 8: 158171.Google Scholar
Baker, A. W. 1915. The armyworm in Ontario in 1914. A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 36: 7587.Google Scholar
Barfoot, S. D. 1957. Oviposition of Ptychomyia selecta Meig. (Dipt. Tachinidae). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 93: 95.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. and Fisher, R. A.. 1953. Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data, and note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9: 176200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottger, G. T. and Patana, R.. 1966. Growth, development and survival of certain Lepidoptera fed gossypol in the diet. J. econ. Ent. 59: 1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottrell, D. G. and Arnold, D. M.. 1968. Parasitism in fall populations of the bollworm and the tobacco budworm from cotton on the high and rolling plains 1967. Progr. Rep. Texas A & M Univ. Texas agric. Exp. Stn PR-2628.Google Scholar
Bottrell, D. G., Young, J. H., Price, R. G., and Adams, R. H.. 1968. Parasites reared from Heliothis spp. in Oklahoma in 1965 and 1966. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 10531055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeland, S. G. 1958. Biological studies on the army worm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haworth) in Tennessee (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 33: 263347.Google Scholar
Burton, R. L. 1970. A low-cost artificial diet for the corn earworm. J. econ. Ent. 63: 19691970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, J. 1962. Techniques for rearing the corn earworm, Heliothis zea. J. econ. Ent. 55: 453457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canerday, T. D. and Arant, F. S.. 1967. Biology of Pseudoplusia includens and notes on the biology of Trichoplusia ni, Rachipulsia ou and Autographa biloba. J. econ. Ent. 60: 870871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauthani, A. R. and Adkisson, P. L.. 1966. Effect of sublethal doses of certain insecticides on eggs, larvae and adults of two species of Heliothis. J. econ. Ent. 59: 10701074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauthani, A. R. and Hamm, J. J.. 1967. Biology of the exotic parasite Drino munda (Diptera: Tachinidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 373376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous insects. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P., Jaynes, H. A., and Gardner, T. R.. 1933. Further investigations of the parasites of Popillia japonica in the far east. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 366.Google Scholar
Cranford, J. 1972 (unpub.). The microsporidian Nosema heliothidis Lutz and Splendor as a parasite of Heliothis zea (Boddie) and Heliothis virescens (F.). M.S. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
Crumb, S. E. 1929. Tobacco cutworms. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 88.Google Scholar
Danks, H. V. 1975. Seasonal cycle and biology of Winthemia rufopicta (Diptera: Tachinidae) as a parasite of Heliothis spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on tobacco in North Carolina. Can. Ent. 107: 639654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. H. and Peairs, L. M.. 1966. Insect pests of farm, garden and orchard. Wiley, New York. 6th ed.Google Scholar
De Stacul, M. V., Barral, L. M., and Orfila, R. N.. 1969. Taxonomia especifidad y caracteres biologicos differenciados del complejo de especies denomonadas “oruga del capullo” del algodon “oruga de la espija” del maiz, “oruga del brote” del tabaco, y “bolillera” de lino. Rev. Invest. Agropecuar ser. 5 Patol. Veg. 6: 1968.Google Scholar
DeLoach, C. J. and Rabb, R. L.. 1971. Life history of Winthemia manducae (Diptera: Tachinidae), a parasite of the tobacco hornworm. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 399409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delobel, B. 1970. Galleria mellonella L., hôte de remplacement pour Phryxe caudata Rond. (Dipt., Larvaevoridae) parasite de Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. Ann. Zool. Ecol. Anim. 2: 373379.Google Scholar
Doutt, R. L. 1959. The biology of parasitic Hymenoptera. A. Rev. Ent. 4: 161182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doutt, R. L. 1964. Biological characteristics of entomophagous adults, pp. 147167. In Debach, P. (Ed.) Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Chapman-Hall, London.Google Scholar
Dulmage, H. T. and Martinez, E.. 1973. The effects of continuous exposure to low concentrations of the delta-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis on the development of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens. J. invert. Path. 22: 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsey, K. D. and Rabb, R. L.. 1970 a. Biology of Voria ruralis (Dipt; Tachinidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 216222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsey, K. D. and Rabb, R. L.. 1970 b. Analysis of seasonal mortality of the cabbage looper in North Carolina. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 15971604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etienne, J. 1969. Laboratory study of the tachinid Diatraeophaga striatalis Townsend, a natural parasite of Chilo sacchariphagus. Entomophaga 14: 407419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fye, R. E. and McAda, W. C.. 1972. Laboratory studies on the development, longevity and fecundity of six lepidopterous pests of cotton in Arizona. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1454.Google Scholar
Guerra, A. A. and Ouye, M. T.. 1968. Hatch, larval development and adult longevity of four lepidopterous species after thermal treatment of eggs. J. econ. Ent. 61: 1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerra, A. A., Ouye, M. T., and Bullock, H. R.. 1968. Effect of ultraviolet radiation on egg hatch, subsequent larval development and adult longevity of the tobacco budworm and the bollworm. J. econ. Ent. 61: 541542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimarães, J. H. 1972. A revision of the genus Winthemia Robineau-Desvoidy in America north of Mexico (Dipt. Tachinidae). Arq. Zool. Estudo São Paulo 22: 27112.Google Scholar
Guppy, J. C. 1961. Life history and behaviour of the armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Eastern Ontario. Can. Ent. 93: 11411153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guppy, J. C. 1969. Some effects of temperature on the immature stages of the armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), under controlled conditions. Can. Ent. 101: 13201327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, M. 1953. Studies on Tachina larvarum L. (Diptera: Tachinidae). Bull. Soc. Fouad I. Ent. 37: 255335.Google Scholar
Hardwick, D. F. 1965. The corn earworm complex. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 40. 248 pp.Google Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1966. Evaluation of parasite or predator responses. J. anim. Ecol. 35: 6575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1968. The behavioural response of a tachinid fly (Cyzenis albicans (Fall.)) to its host, the winter moth (Operophtera brumata (L.)). J. anim. Ecol. 37: 627639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawboldt, L. S. 1947. Bessa selecta (Meigen) (Diptera: Tachinidae) as a parasite of Gilpinia hercyniae (Hartig) (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Can. Ent. 79: 84104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hefley, H. M. 1925. Parasite of the larvae of the tomato worm moth Protoparce quin-quemaculatus. Proc. Okla Acad. Sci. 5: 7780.Google Scholar
Herrebout, W. M. 1966. The fate of the eggs of Eucarcelia rutilla Vill. (Diptera: Tachinidae) deposited upon the integument of the host. Z. angew. Ent. 58: 340355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrebout, W. M. 1969 a. Some aspects of host selection in Eucarcelia rutilla Vill. (Diptera: Tachinidae). Neth. J. Zool. 19: 1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrebout, W. M. 1969 b. Habitat selection in Eucarcelia rutilla Vill. (Diptera: Tachinidae). II. Experiments with females of known age. Z. angew. Ent. 63: 336349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herting, B. 1960. Biologie der Westpaläarktischen Raupenfliegen Dipt., Tachinidae. Monogr. Z. angew. Ent. 16. 188 pp.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1965. The fertilisation of the egg in oviparous tachinids (Diptera). Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Contr. 5: 142144.Google Scholar
Hodjat, S. H. 1970. Effects of crowding on colour, size and larval activity of Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ent. exp. appl. 13: 97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, C. L. 1972. Protective function of sound perception and gregariousness in Hylesia larvae (Saturniidae: Hemileucinae). J. Lepid. Soc. 26: 3334.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. S. 1974 (unpub.). The biology of Archytas marmoratus, with notes on tachinid parasites of Heliothis in North Carolina. M.S. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
Ignoffo, C. M. 1963. A successful technique for mass-rearing cabbage loopers on a semi-synthetic diet. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 56: 178184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignoffo, C. M. 1965. The nuclear polyhedrosis virus of Heliothis zea (Boddie) and Heliothis virescens (Fabricius). II. Biology and propagation of diet-reared Heliothis. J. invert. Path. 7: 47226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isely, D. 1935. Relation of hosts to abundance of cotton bollworm. Univ. Ark. agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 320.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. G., Butler, G. D. Jr., and Bryan, D. E.. 1969. Time required for development of Voria ruralis and its host, the cabbage looper, at different temperatures. J. econ. Ent. 62: 6970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanervo, V. and Talvitie, Y. K. K.. 1946. Tutkimuksia sinnappikuoriaiskarpasesta Meigenia mutabilis Fall. Ann. Zool. Soc. zool.-bot. Vanamo 11(5): 145.Google Scholar
Landis, B. J. and Howard, N. F.. 1940. Paradexodes epilachnae, a tachinid parasite of the Mexican bean beetle. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 721.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. J. and Brazzel, J. R.. 1968. A three-year study of the parasites of the bollworm and the tobacco budworm in Mississippi. J. econ. Ent. 61: 673676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. J. and Vinson, S. B.. 1968. Immunological relationships between the parasite Cardiochiles nigriceps Vierick [sic] and certain Heliothis species. J. Insect Physiol. 14: 613626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loos, K. 1908. Beobachtungen uber einen bedeutungsvollen Fleigenschmarotzer an dem Nonnen insekt. Zentbl. ges Forstw. 1908: 49.Google Scholar
Mansour, M. H. and Dimetry, D. Z.. 1972. Effect of crowding on larvae and pupae of the greasy cutworm Agrotis ipsilon Hufn. (Lepid. Noctuidae). Z. angew. Ent. 72: 220223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellini, E. 1969. Studi sui Ditteri Larvevoridi. XX. Influenze esecitata dalla vittima sul parassita. Mem. Soc. ent. Ital. 48: 324350.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L., Flint, W. P., and Metcalf, R. L.. 1962. Destructive and useful insects: their habits and control. McGraw-Hill, New York. 4th ed.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. 1971. Parasitism of the corn earworm, Heliothis zea and the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, on corn in North Georgia. J. Ga ent. Soc. 6: 246249.Google Scholar
Mistric, W. J. Jr., and Smith, F. D.. 1969. Behaviour of tobacco budworm larvae on flue-cured tobacco and possibilities of improving the effectiveness of insecticidal treatments applied mechanically for control. J. econ. Ent. 62: 1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. 1922. Zygobothria nidicola, an important parasite of the brown-tail moth. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bull. 1088.Google Scholar
Neunzig, H. H. 1969. The biology of the tobacco budworm and the corn earworm in North Carolina, with particular reference to tobacco as a host. N.C. agric. Exp. Stn Tech. Bull. 196.Google Scholar
Oatman, E. R. and Platner, G. R.. 1970. Parasitisation of corn earworm larvae infesting sweet corn tassels in southern California. J. econ. Ent. 63: 326327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfadt, R. E. 1971. Fundamentals of applied entomology. Macmillan, New York. 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Poitout, S. 1969. La consanguinité chez les Lepiodoptères Noctuidae; mise en evidence de son importance dans la conduite d'élevages en conditions artificielles. Ann. Zool. Écol. Anim. 1: 245264.Google Scholar
Prell, H. 1915. Zur Biologie der Tachinen Parasetigena segregata Rond. und Panzeria rudis Fall. Z. angew. Ent. 2: 57148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prop, N. 1960. Protection against birds and parasites in some species of tenthredinid larvae. Archs néerl. Zool. 13: 380447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pschorn-Walcher, H. 1969. The host specificity of Tachinidae (Diptera) attacking sawflies (Hym. Symphyta). Commonw. Inst. Biol. Contr. Tech. Bull. 12: 2936.Google Scholar
Pschorn-Walcher, H. 1971. Experiments on interspecific competition between three species of tachinids attacking the sugar cane moth borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.). Entomophaga 16: 125131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, M. 1970. Exorista flaviceps, a tachinid parasite of Pieris rapae in South Australia. J. econ. Ent. 63: 836841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salama, H. S. and Salem, S. A.. 1971. Biology of Spodoptera littoralis Bois. as affected by larval density (Lep: Noctuidae). Z. angew. Ent. 67: 141143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaaf, A.C. 1972. The parasitoid complex of Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenee) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Quaest. Ent. 8: 81120.Google Scholar
Shaver, T. N. and Lukefahr, M. J.. 1969. Effect of flavonoid pigments and gossypol on growth and development of the bollworm, tobacco budworm and pink bollworm. J. econ. Ent. 62: 643646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, M. and Sterling, W.. 1972. Incidence of parasitism of Heliothis spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in some cotton fields of Texas. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65: 759760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, F. 1915. Rearing of moths and tachina flies from larvae and pupae of armyworm in North Carolina in 1914. J. econ. Ent. 8: 299302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H. and Hale, R. L.. 1965. Mass-rearing of the larvae of nine species on a simple artificial medium. J. econ. Ent. 58: 522524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H., Andres, L. A., and Hale, R. L. Jr. 1962. The biology of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). I. Life history and behaviour. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55: 591597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilowitz, Z. and Smith, C. L.. 1970. Distributions and frequencies of weight of cabbage looper reared on artificial diet. J. econ. Ent. 64: 11061107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.. 1967. Statistical methods. Iowa State Univ. Press. 6th ed.Google Scholar
Snyder, K. D. 1954. The effect of temperature and food on the development of the variegated cutworm, Peridroma margaritosa (Haw.). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 47: 603613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehr, F. W. and Cook, E. F.. 1968. A revision of the genus Malacosoma Hubner in North America (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae): systematics, biology, immatures and parasites. .S. nat. Mus. Bull. 276. p. 321.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. A. and Lam, J. J.. 1969. Hourly and seasonal collections of six harmful insects in traps equipped with blacklight lamps. J. econ. Ent. 62: 100102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinner, R. E., Rabb, R. L., and Bradley, J. R.. 1974. Population dynamics of Heliothis zea (Boddie) and H. virescens (F.) in North Carolina: a simulation model. Env. Ent. 3: 163168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, E. H. 1923. Biological notes on parasites of prairie cutworms. Can. Dep. Agric. Ent. Br. Bull. 26. 40 pp.Google Scholar
Sutherland, D. W. S. 1966. Biological investigations of Trichoplusia ni (Hubner) and other Lepidoptera damaging cruciferous crops on Long Island, New York. N. Y. agric. Exp. Stn Mem. 399. Cornell Univ.Google Scholar
Townes, H. K. 1962. Host selection patterns in some nearctic ichneumonids (Hymenoptera). Proc. int. Cong. Ent. (Vienna) 2: 738741.Google Scholar
Tripp, H. A. 1962. The relationship of Spathimeigenia spinigera Townsend (Diptera: Tachinidae) to its host, Neodiprion swainei Midd. (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Can. Ent. 94: 809818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, H. H. 1950. Cutworms, armyworms and related species attacking cereal and forage crops in the central great plains. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. 849.Google Scholar
Walton, W. R. 1913. Efficiency of a tachinid parasite on the last instar of Laphygma. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 15: 128131.Google Scholar
Winburn, T. F. and Painter, R. H.. 1932. Insect enemies of the corn earworm (H. obsoleta Fabr.). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 5: 128.Google Scholar