Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-77sjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-03T23:12:46.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FEEDING BEHAVIOUR OF THE PALES WEEVIL, HYLOBIUS PALES (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE): I. SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS WITH LOBLOLLY PINE PHLOEM EXTRACTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. A. Thomas  and
J. D. White
H. A. Thomas
Affiliation:
Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
J. D. White
Affiliation:
Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A bioassay with elder pith wafers was developed to measure sustained feeding of the pales weevil, Hylobius pales (Herbst). Sucrose, fructose, glucose, and extracts of phloem of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were compared in three-choice experiments. Intensity of feeding indicated a synergistic effect occurred when sucrose and phloem lipid were present together. The non-polar or neutral lipid fraction of phloem stimulated more feeding than did the polar lipid fraction.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 74 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, J. E. and Norris, D. M.. 1967. A feeding stimulant for Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) isolated from the bark of Ulmus americana. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 1213–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. E. and Norris, D. M.. 1968. Further biological and chemical aspects of host selection by Scolytus multistriatus. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 1248–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. E., Rainey, D. P., Norris, D. M., and Strong, F. M.. 1968. p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde and other phenolics as feeding stimulants for the smaller elm bark beetle. Forest, Sci. 14: 91–95.Google Scholar
Beck, S. D. 1965. Resistance of plants to insects. A. Rev. Ent. 10: 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bligh, E. G. and Dyer, W. J.. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37: 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesse, G., Kauth, H., and Wächter, R.. 1955. Frasslockstoffe beim Fichtenrüsselkäfer Hylobius abietis L. Z. angew. Ent. 37: 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loschiavo, S. R. 1965. Methods for studying aggregation and feeding behavior of the confused flour beetle Tribolium confusum. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. M. and Baker, J. E.. 1967. Feeding responses of the beetle Scolytus to chemical stimuli in the bark of Ulmus. J. Insect Physiol. 13: 955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnesorge, B. 1953. Der Einfluss von Geruchs- und Geschmacksstoffen auf die Wahl der Frassplanzen beim grossen braunen Rüsselkäfer Hylobius abietis L. Beitr. Ent. 3: 437–468.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. A. and Hertel, G. D.. 1969. Responses of the pales weevil to natural and synthetic host attractants. J. econ. Ent. 62: 383–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. 1953. The chemotactic responses that determine host specificity in an oligophagous insect (Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) Lepidoptera). Can. J. Zool. 31: 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. 1960. Host selection of phytophagous insects. A. Rev. Ent. 5: 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, R. and Fraenkel, G. S.. 1960. Assay of the principal gustatory stimulant for tobacco hornworm, Protoparce sexta, from solanaceous plants. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar