Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T01:51:53.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FORAGING DYNAMICS OF PEPONAPIS PRUINOSA (HYMENOPTERA: ANTHOPHORIDAE) ON PUMPKIN (CUCURBITA PEPO) IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. Susan Willis  and
Peter G. Kevan
D. Susan Willis
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Peter G. Kevan*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
*
2 Author to whom reprint requests should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large population of Peponapis pruinosa, a solitary, oligolectic, ground-nesting bee and important pollinator of cucurbits in the United States and Mexico, was studied foraging on pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) at a site in Cambridge, Ontario, from 23 July to 30 August 1990. We measured the diurnal and seasonal foraging trends for P. pruinosa and compared our findings with those for P. pruinosa elsewhere. The females are active on flowers in the mornings from dawn on. The males are active later in the mornings and spend afternoons and nights in closed flowers. The seasonal emergence of the bees closely parallels that of the plants’ anthesis. Diurnal activity is related to the availability of pollen resources on the flowers of C. pepo. Almost all pollen is removed from the synandria within 2 h of the start of foraging by female bees. Ambient temperature threshold for foraging by both sexes is about 10 °C.

Résumé

Une importante population de l’abeille de terre solitaire oligolectique, Peponapis pruinosa, un pollinisateur actif des cucurbitacés aux États-Unis et au Mexique, a visité une culture de citrouilles (Cucurbita pepo) à Cambridge, Ontario, du 23 juillet au 30 août 1990. Nous avons mesuré les tendances quotidiennes et saisonnière de l’alimentation de l’abeille et avons comparé nos résultats à ceux de recherches effectuées à d’autres endroits. Les femelles sont présentes sur les fleurs le matin, dès l’aube. Les mâles sont actifs plus tard le matin et passent leur après-midi et leur nuit à l’intérieur des inflorescences refermées. L’émergence saisonnière des abeilles correspond étroitement à l’anthèse de la plante. L’activité diurne est reliée à la disponibilité du pollen sur les fleurs de C. pepo. Presque tout le pollen est prélevé des synandres en moins de 2 h lorsque les femelles procèdent à leur quête de nourriture. Le seuil inférieur de température ambiante de l’alimentation est d’environ 10 °C, aussi bien chez les mâles que chez les femelles.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 127 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 167 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

For this paper, Mark L. Winston acted as Scientific Editor.

References

Cockerell, T.D.A. 1896. New bees of the genera Xenoglossa and Podalirius (Anthophora). The Canadian Entomologist 28: 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J.B. 1970. Insect Pollination of Crops. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hurd, P.D. Jr., 1966. The pollination of pumpkins, gourds and squashes (Genus Cucurbita). Bee World 47(1): 97–98.Google Scholar
Hurd, P.D. Jr.,, and Linsley, E.G.. 1964. The squash and gourd bees—genera Peponapis Robertson and Xenoglossa Smith—inhabiting America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Hilgardia 35(15): 375–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, P.D. Jr.,, and Linsley, E.G.. 1970. A Classification of the Squash and Gourd Bees Peponapis and Xenoglossa (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). University of California Publications in Entomology 62: 39 pp.Google Scholar
Hurd, P.D. Jr.,, Linsley, E.G., and Michelbacher, A.E.. 1974. Ecology of the Squash and Gourd Bee, Peponapis pruinosa, on Cultivated Cucurbits in California (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 168. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hurd, P.D. Jr.,, Linsley, E.G., and Whitaker, T.W.. 1971. Squash and gourd bees (Peponapis, Xenoglossa) and the origin of the cultivated Cucurbita. Evolution 25: 218–234.Google ScholarPubMed
Kevan, P.G., Clark, E.A., and Thomas, V.C.. 1990. Insect pollinators and sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5(1): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, P.G., Mohr, N.A., Offer, M.D., and Kemp, J.R.. 1988. The squash and gourd bee, Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) in Ontario, Canada. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 119: 9–15.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1960. Observations on some matinal bees at flowers of Cucurbita, Ipomoea, and Datura in desert areas of New Mexico and southeastern Arizona. New York Entomological Society 118: 13–20.Google Scholar
Mathewson, J.A. 1968. Nest construction and life history of the eastern cucurbit bee, Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 41(2): 255–261.Google Scholar
McGregor, S.E. 1976. Insect Pollination of Cultivated Crop Plants. Agriculture Handbook 496: 306–312. USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nevkryta, A. 1937. On the fauna and ecology of insects pollinators of the family Cucurbitaceae. Academy of Science of the R.S.S. Ukraine Institute of Zoology and Biology 14: 231–258.Google Scholar
Rozen, J.G., and Ayala, R.. 1987. Nesting biology of the squash bee Peponapis utahensis (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae, Eucerini). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 95(1): 28–33.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. 1028 pp.Google Scholar
Seaton, H.L., and Kremer, J.C.. 1939. The influence of climatological factors on anthesis and anther dehiscence in cultivated cucurbits. A preliminary report. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 36: 627–631.Google Scholar
Tepedino, V.J. 1981. The pollination efficiency of squash bee (Peponapis pruinosa) and the honey bee (Apis mellifera) on summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 54(2): 359–377.Google Scholar
Willis, D.S. 1991. The Pollination System of C. pepo and P. pruinosa in Southern Ontario. M.Sc. dissertation, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada. 110 pp.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1974. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ. 620 pp.Google Scholar