Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T08:19:05.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GUSTATORY CUES IN THE ORIENTATION OF DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) TO HOST TREES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K. F. Raffa
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington99164
A. A. Berryman
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington99164

Abstract

Female mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, were exposed to papers soaked in outer bark extracts of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta Douglas var. latifolia Engelmann. Both benzene and methanol–water extracts elicited greater feeding activity than did controls. Non-polar host compounds exhibited greater incitant (initiation of feeding) properties, while polar compounds were more powerful stimulants (continuation of feeding). No differences were detected in feeding on extracts from resistant or susceptible trees. Repellency appears to be associated with beetle responses to active host metabolism.

Résumé

Des femelles du dendroctone du pin ponderosa, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, ont été mises en présence de papiers trempés dans des extraits d'écorce externe du pin Pinus contorta Douglas var. latifolia Engelmann. Des extraits au benzène ou au méthanol-eau ont tous deux suscité une activité d'alimentation accrue par rapport aux témoins. Les substances non-polaires de l'hôte se sont avérées plus incitantes (initiation de l'alimentation), alors que les composés polaires se sont révélés plus stimulants (continuation de l'alimentation). Aucune différence dans l'alimentation n'a été décelée entre des extraits d'arbres résistants et susceptibles. La répulsion semble être le fait d'une réponse de l'insecte au métabolisme fonctionnel de l'hôte.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, J. E. and Norris, D. M.. 1968 a. Further biological and chemical aspects of host selection by Scolytus multistriatus. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 12481255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. E. and Norris, D. M.. 1968 b. Behavioral response of the smaller European elm bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus to extracts of non-host tree tissue. Entomologia exp. appl. 11: 464469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D. 1965. Resistance of plants to insects. A. Rev. Ent. 10: 207232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. and Ashraf, M.. 1970. Effects of Abies grandis resin on the attack behavior and brood survival of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 102: 12291236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, R. F., Gara, R. I., and Hrutfiord, B. F.. 1976. Influence of ponderosa pine resin on the response of Dendroctonus ponderosae to synthetic trans-verbenol. Environ. Ent. 5: 171179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, B. L., Baker, J. E., and Norris, D. M.. 1967. Juglone (5-hydroxy-1, 4-naphthoquinone) from Carya ovata, a deterrent to feeding by Scolytus multistriatus. J. Insect Physiol. 13: 14531459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, B. L. and Norris, D. M.. 1968. A chemical basis for bark beetle (Scolytus) distinction between host and non-host trees. J. Insect Physiol. 14: 10631068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynum, B. G. and Berryman, A. A.. 1980. Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Preaggregation landing and gallery initiation on lodgepole pine. Can. Ent. 112: 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, R. L. 1978. Lodgepole pine / mountain pine beetle risk classification methods and their application. pp. 106113in Berryman, A. A., Amman, G. D., Stark, R. W., and Kibee, D. L. (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests. College of Forest Resource, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow.Google Scholar
Moeck, H. A., Wood, D. L., and Lindahl, K. Q. Jr., 1981. Host selection behavior of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa, with special emphasis on the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis. J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 4983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. M. and Baker, J. E.. 1967. Feeding response of Scolytus to chemical stimuli in the bark of Ulmus. J. Insect Physiol. 13: 955962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. M., Baker, J. E., Borg, T. K., Ferkovich, S. M., and Rozenthal, J. M.. 1970. An energytransduction mechanism in chemoreception by the bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 24: 263274.Google Scholar
Raffa, K. F. 1980. The role of host resistance in the colonization behavior, ecology and evolution of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Washington State Univ., Pullman. 137 pp.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. F. 1958. Population studies of the mountain pine beetle. Interim. Rep. 1957-1, For. Biol. Lab., Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. F. 1966. Factors influencing the orientation and rates of activity of Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 98: 507518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, G. R. 1957. The fir engraver, a serious enemy of western true firs. U.S. Dep. Agric. Prod. Res. Rep. 11. 19 pp.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L. 1972. Selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles. pp. 101107in van Emden, H. F. (Ed.), R.E.S. Symposium No. 6: Insect/Plant Relationships. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L., Cobb, F. W. Jr., Cohen, D. J., Browne, L. E., Moeck, H. A., and Stark, R. W.. 1974. Host selection by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the mixed conifer forests of California. In Jermy, T. (Ed.), Symp. on the Host Plant in Relation to Insect Behavior and Reproduction, June 11–14, 1974. Tihany, Hungary.Google Scholar
Wood, S. L. 1963. A revision of the bark beetle genus Dendroctonus Erickson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Great Basin Nat. 23: 1117.Google Scholar