Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T02:01:27.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF BRACONINAE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Roy D. Shenefelt
Roy D. Shenefelt
Affiliation:
630 Oak St., Oregon, Wisconsin 73575
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The “cyclostome” subdivision of the Family Braconidae was recognized by Wesmael in 1835 and characterized as having the clypeus emarginated in such a way that a circular opening is left between it and the mandibles. This character has been used as one of the bases for primary segregation of the family into major groups ever since. However, it has long been recognized that other features are involved. For example, the clypeus is not simply emarginate but is also raised or becomes carinate transversely (horizontally) across the middle and it is the portion of the clypeus ventrad of the ridge which is impressed in such a way that the clypeus appears to be cut out. The degree to which the clypeus is infolded (backfolded) varies considerably. In addition, the labrum, which is broad at the base and narrows to the apex, is concave on the anterior side. This concavity is useful in segregating groups such as the Opiinae from the cyclostomes. Authors have tended to retain the cyclostome group as the subfamily Braconinae in the broad sense and to include therein the Rogadinae and Doryctinae.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 7 , 01 July 1978 , pp. 765 - 768
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

De Leon, D. 1934. The morphology of Coeloides dendroctoni Cushman (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 42: 297–316.Google Scholar
De Leon, D. 1935. The biology of Coeloides dendroctoni Cushman (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) an important parasite of the mountain pine beetle ( Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk.). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 28: 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeselbarth, E. 1967. Zur Kenntnis der palaearctischen Arten der Gattung Coeloides Wesmael (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Mitt. Münch. ent. Ges. 57: 20–53.Google Scholar
Richerson, J. V., Borden, J. H., and Hollingdale, J.. 1972. Morphology of a unique sensillum placodeum on the antennae of Coeloides brunneri (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Can. J. Zool. 50: 909–913.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. B. 1962. Durations of the immature stadia of Coeloides brunneri (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) at various constant temperatures with descriptions of the five larval instars. Ann. ent. Soc. Am 55: 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. B. and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1962. Biology and habits of the Douglas-fir beetle parasite, Coeloides brunneri Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), in western Oregon. Can. Ent. 94: 748–763.Google Scholar
Shenefelt, R. D. 1943. The genus Atanycolus Foerster in America north of Mexico. Res. Stud. St. Coll. Wash. 11: 51–163.Google Scholar
Tobias, V. I. 1957. K morfologii, sisematiki i filogenii natriby Braconina Tel. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Zool. Zh. 36: 1338–1354 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Watanabe, C. 1958. A revision of the species of the genus Coeloides Wesmael occurring in Japan, with description of a new species. Insecta matsum. 22: 1–6.Google Scholar