Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T23:30:40.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE PLACE OF CLASSICAL TAXONOMY IN MODERN SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ORTHOPTEROID INSECTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. Keith McE. Kevan
D. Keith McE. Kevan
Affiliation:
Lyman Entomological Museum and Research Laboratory, and Department of Entomology, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The nature of systematics and its fundamental importance to other branches of biology have already been ably discussed by such authors as Simpson (1961) and Mayr (1963, 1969). Thus, in defining systematic entomology, we may paraphrase Simpson (1961): Systematic entomology is the scientific study of the kinds and diversity of insects and associated arthropods and any and all [biological] relationships among them. “Modern” merely implies current and recent, not avant-garde, although this is not excluded.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 9 , September 1973 , pp. 1211 - 1222
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. D. and Bigelow, R. S.. 1960. Allochromic speciation in field crickets and a new species, Acheta veletis. Evolution 14: 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackith, R. E. and Blackith, R. M.. 1968. A numerical taxonomy of orthopteroid insects. Aust. J. Zool. 16: 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackith, R. E. and Kevan, D. K. McE.. 1967. A study of the genus Chrotogonous (Orthoptera). VIII. Patterns of variation in external morphology. Evolution 21: 76–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwelder, R. E. 1967. Taxonomy: A text and reference book. Wiley, New York. 698 pp.Google Scholar
Bolívar, I. 1910. Neuvo Locústido de la India, perjudiceal à la Agricultura (Colemania sphenarioides Bol.). Bol. Soc. esp. Hist. nat. 10: 318–321.Google Scholar
Criddle, N. 1925. Field crickets in Manitoba. Can. Ent. 57: 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutten, F. E. A. and Kevan, D. K. McE.. 1970. The Nymphomyiidae (Diptera) with special reference to Palaeodipteron walkeri Idle and its larva in Quebec, and a description of a new genus and species from India. Can. J. Zool. 48: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirsh, V. M. 1951. A new grasshopper (Orth. Acrididae) damaging groundnuts. Bull. ent. Res. 42: 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heirtzler, J. R. and Burroughs, R. H.. 1971. Madagascar's Paleopositon: new data from the Mozambique Channel. Science 174: 488–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, etc. 263 pp.Google Scholar
Hogan, T. W. 1971. An evaluation of a genetic method for population suppression of Teleogryllus commodus (Wlk.) (Orth., Gryllidae) in Victoria. Bull. ent. Res. 60: 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. 1959. A study of the genus Chrotogonus Audinet-Serville, 1839. (Orthoptera:Acridoidea:Pyrogomorphidae). Publ. cult. Cia. Diam. Angola 43: 11–246.Google Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. 1963. A revision of the Desmopterini (Orthoptera:Acridoidea:Pyrgomorphidae). I. Genera other than Desmopterella. Nova Guinea (n.s.) 10: 361–401.Google Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. 1966. A revision of the known Asiatic Sphenariini (Orthoptera:Acridoidea:Pyrgomorphidae) with the erection of a new genus. Can. Ent. 98: 1275–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. 1969 a. The type-species of Poekilocerus Audinet-Serville, 1831, and Zonocerus Stål 1873 (Insecta, Orthoptera, Pyrgomorphidae) and revised proposals in respect of associated family-group names. Z.N.(S.) 1650. Bull. zool. Nom. 26: 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. 1969 b. A preliminary revision of the Asiatic Chlorizeinini (0rthoptera:Acridoidea:Pyrgomorphidae). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 94: 355–378.Google Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. 1970. A revision of the Desmopterini (Orthoptera:Acridoidea:Pyrgomorphidae). II. Desmopterella Ramme, 1941. Pacif. Insects 12: 543–627.Google Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. 1971. The contribution of the late Sir Boris P. Uvarov (1888–1970) to the systematics of Orthoptera – An appreciation. Entomologist 104: 324–330.Google Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE., Akbar, S. S., and Chang, Y.-C.. 1970. The concealed copulatory structures of the Pyrgomorphidae (Orth:Acridoidea). II. Eos, Madr. 45 (1969): 173–228.Google Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE., Akbar, S. S., and Chang, Y.-C.. 1970. The concealed copulatory structures of the Pyrgomorphidae (Orth:Acridoidea). IV. Eos, Madr. 47. In press.Google Scholar
Lim, H.-C. 1970. Further cytological studies of Antipodean Teleogryllus species and their hybrids (0rthoptera:Gryllidae). Can. J. Zool. 48: 523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, H.-C. 1971 (unpub.). Cytogenetics in relation to taxonomy within the family Gryllidae (Orthoptera), with observations on some artificially induced changes. Ph.D. Thesis. McGill University, Montreal. 143 pp; xxxix tab., 199 figs.Google Scholar
Lim, H.-C., Vickery, V. R., and Kevan, D. K. McE.. 1973. Cytogenetic studies in relation to taxonomywithin the family Gryllidae. I. Subfamily Gryllinae. Can. J. Zool. 51: 179–186, pl. I, II.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.797 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw Hill, New York etc. 428 pp.Google Scholar
Randell, R. L. 1964. The male genitalia in Gryllinae (Orthoptera:Gryllidae) and a tribal revision. Can. Ent. 96: 1565–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabrosky, C. W. 1970. Quo Vadis, Taxonomy? Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 16: 3–7.Google Scholar
Sharov, A. G. 1968. Filogenia Ortopteroidnkh Nasekomykh. Trud. paleont. Akad. Nauk SSSR 118: 2–217.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 247 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 247 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. 1921. A revision of the genus Locusta, L. (= Pachtylus, Fieb.), with a new theory as to the periodicity and migrations of locusts. Bull. ent. Res. 12: 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, V. R. 1967. Distribution and variation in North American Chorthippus (Orthoptera:Acrididae:Gomophocerinae). Annls. Soc. ent. Québ. 12: 100–132.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E. 1939. Fossil Ensifera, 1. British Museum (Natural History), London. 321 pp.Google Scholar