Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:45:09.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

REVISION OF THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OF METACLISIS FOERSTER (HYMENOPTERA, PLATYGASTRIDAE, INOSTEMMATINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa K1A 0C6

Abstract

The Nearctic species of the genus Metaclisis are revised. Of 18 species recognized, 16 of them new to science as follows: M. acericola (Quebec, Ontario), M. acerina (Quebec, Ontario, Illinois), M. aceris (Quebec, Ontario), M. acuta (Arizona), M. alticola (New Mexico), M. annae (Texas), M. attenuata (California), M. borealis (Labrador), M. ensifer (California), M. filicornis (Ontario), M. longula (Illinois, Maryland, Ontario), M. masoni (Manitoba), M. pumilio (Ontario, Quebec, Illinois, Maryland, N. and S. Carolina), M. sulcata (Eastern Canada and U.S.A., Tennessee), M. verna (Ontario), and M. vernalis (Quebec, Ontario, Maryland). M. carinata (Ashmead) ♀ and M. floridana (Ashmead) ♂ are redescribed and the male of M. floridana is newly described. A generic diagnosis of Metaclisis and keys to females and males of Nearctic species are given. The higher classification, bionomics, world distribution, and character states of Metaclisis species are discussed.

Résumé

L’auteur révise les espèces néarctiques du genre Metaclisis. Parmi les 18 espèces reconnues, 16 sont nouvelles, soit M. acericola (Québec, Ontario), M. acerina (Québec, Ontario, Illinois), M. aceris (Québec, Ontario), M. acuta (Arizona), M. alticola (Nouveau Mexique), M. annae (Texas), M. attenuata (Californie), M. borealis (Labrador), M. ensifer (Californie), M. filicornis (Ontario), M. longula (Illinois, Maryland, Ontario), M. masoni) (Manitoba), M. pumilio (Ontario, Québec, Illinois, Maryland, Caroline du Nord et du Sud), M. sulcata (est du Canada et des États-Unis, Tennessee), M. verna (Ontario) et M. vernalis (Québec, Ontario, Maryland). M. carinata (Ashmead) et M. floridana (Ashmead) sont redécrits et le mâle de M. floridana est décrit pour la première fois. L’auteur présente un diagnostic générique Metaclisis et des clefs d’identification des femelles et des mâles de certaines espèces néarctiques. Il étudie la classification supérieure, la bionomie, la répartition mondiale et la manifestation des caractères d’espèces de Metaclisis.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. 1887. Studies of the North American Proctotrupidae, with descriptions of new species from Florida. Can. Ent. 19: 125132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. 1888. Descriptions of some new genera and species of Canadian Proctotrupidae. Can. Ent. 20: 4855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. 1893. A monograph of the North American Proctotrypidae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 45. 472 pp.Google Scholar
Debauche, R. H. 1947. Scelionidae de la Faune belge. Bull. Annls Soc. r. ent. Belg. 83: 255285.Google Scholar
Foerster, A. 1856. Hymenopterologische Studien, Vol. 2. 152 pp. Aachen.Google Scholar
Hellén, W. 1968. Platygasterinenfunde aus Finnland (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea). Notul. ent. 48: 4548.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1914. In André, Spec. Hym. Eur. Alg., 11: 355.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1926. Scelionidae. Das Tierreich 48. 885 pp.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M. A. 1970. Supergeneric groupings of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera). Rev. Ent. USSR 49: 203226. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Kozlov, M. A., in Medvedev, G. S.. 1978. Superfamily Proctotrupoidea, in Keys to the fauna of the European part of the USSR, Hymenoptera, Part II, Vol. 3: 538691. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Maneval, H. 1936. Nouveau genre et nouvelles espèces de Platygasterinae (Hym.) de la faune Franco-Belge. Bull. Annls Soc. r. ent. Belg. 76: 4558.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1965. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the British Museum (Natural History) and in the Hope Department of Entomology, Oxford. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., Suppl. 1. 154 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1980 a. Key to genera of Scelionidae of the Holarctic region, with descriptions of new genera and species (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 113. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1980 b. The Nearctic species of Acerotella Masner (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Platygastridae). Can. Ent. 112: 12911303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masner, L. and Muesebeck, C. F. W.. 1968. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the United States National Museum. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 270. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W., in Krombein, K. V. et al. 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Vol. 1, 1198 pp. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. and Masner, L.. 1967. Proctotrupoidea. pp. 285305in Krombein, K. V. and Burks, B. D. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2 (Suppl. 2).Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. and Walkley, L. M., in Muesebeck, et al. 1951. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C.1420 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. and Walkley, L. M.. 1956. Type species of the genera and subgenera of parasitic wasps comprising the superfamily Proctotrupoidea (Order Hymenoptera). Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 105: 319419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, J. B. 1959. A new Palearctic species of the genus Metaclisis Foerster, 1856 from south of Hungary (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea). Opusc. Zool. 3: 8994.Google Scholar
Tomšík, B. 1950. Czechoslovak Inostemmini — parasites of Cecidomyiidae. Folia ent. 13: 4964.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1842. Descriptions of chalcidites discovered in Valdivia by C. Darwin, Esq. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 10: 271274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar