Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T13:13:48.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEX PHEROMONES AND SUPPRESSION OF THE CODLING MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Elmer A. C. Hagley
Elmer A. C. Hagley
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Vineland Station, Ontario L0R 2E0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Several authors (Charmillot and Baggiolini 1975; Proverbs et al. 1975; Roelofs et al. 1976; MacLellan 1976) have stated that mass-trapping male codling moths with sex pheromones did not provide economic control of this pest. MacLellan (1976), however, reported suppression of codling moth populations in unsprayed orchards 2-3 ha in size and Madsen et al. (1976) obtained similar results in orchards in which sprays were not applied specifically for codling moth control. In 1975 and 1976 similar studies were undertaken in three 0.5–0.75 ha plots (A, B, C) of mature apple trees at Vineland (Hagley 1970). Plots A and B had not received insecticide sprays from 1969 to 1974 and had relatively high codling moth infestation levels (Table I). Plot C had been on a pest management program since 1971.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 7 , 01 July 1978 , pp. 781 - 783
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charmillot, P. J. and Baggiolini, M.. 1975. Essai de lutte contre le carpocapse ( Laspeyresia pomonella L.) par capture intensive des mâles à l'aide d'attractifs servels synthétiques. Rech. Agron. Suisse 14: 71–77.Google Scholar
Deseö, K. V. 1971. Study of factors influencing the fecundity and fertility of codling moth ( Laspeyresia pomonella L., Lepid, Tortr.). Acta phytopath. Acad. Sci. Hung. 6: 243–252.Google Scholar
Gehring, R. D. and Madsen, H. F.. 1963. Some aspects of the mating and oviposition behaviour of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella. J. econ. Ent. 56: 140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C. 1970. The distribution and survival of overwintering codling moth larvae in southern Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 100(1969): 40–48.Google Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C. 1972. Effect of rainfall on the survival and establishment of codling moth larvae. Environ. Ent. 1: 446–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E. A. C. 1974. Codling moth: Emergence, sex ratio, and abundance. Can. Ent. 106: 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1976. Suppression of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) by sex pheromone trapping of males. Can. Ent. 108: 1037–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, H. F., Vakenti, J. M., and Peters, F. E.. 1976. Codling moth: Suppression by male removal with sex pheromone traps in an isolated apple orchard. J. econ. Ent. 69: 597–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proverbs, M. D., Logan, D. M., and Newton, J. R.. 1975. A study to suppress codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) with sex pheromone traps. Can. Ent. 107: 1265–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L., Cardé, R. T., Taschenberg, E. F., and Weires, R. W. Jr., 1976. Pheromone research for the control of lepidopterous pests in New York. ACS Symposium Series 1976: 75–87.Google Scholar