Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T13:21:27.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stimuli increasing oviposition by female coffee white stem borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Marc Rhainds ,
Maarten Warndorff ,
Phang Kok Chiew ,
Chin Chiew Lan  and
Gerhard Gries
Marc Rhainds*
Affiliation:
Center for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Maarten Warndorff
Affiliation:
Nestlé (China) Agriculture Service Kunming Liasion Office, Kunming Office, 19 Renmin Donglu, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China 650051
Phang Kok Chiew
Affiliation:
Nestlé Singapore (Pte) Limited Research and Development Center, 29 Quality Road, Singapore 618802
Chin Chiew Lan
Affiliation:
Nestlé (Malasyia) Research and Development Center Sdn Bhd, PO Box 185, 0800 Sg Petaini, Kedah DA, Malaysia
Gerhard Gries
Affiliation:
Center for Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be sent at the following address: Department of Entomology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, United States 14456 (E-mail: mr242@nysaes.cornell.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The coffee white stem borer, Xylotrechus quadripes (Chevrolat) is a major pest of coffee, Coffea arabica (L.) (Rubiaceae), in South Africa, India, Thailand, and China (Duffy 1968; Schoeman 1990; Visitpanich 1994; Montavon 1997). Females lay eggs singly or in batches, generally under bark crevices of the stem. Neonatal larvae feed beneath the bark and, during development, bore deeply inside the stem. Stems are colonized by up to 60 larvae. Extensive damage by larvae causes mortality of coffee plants or reduction of fruit production (Duffy 1968; GK veeresh). Because larvae inside the stems of coffee plants are difficult to control, management tactics are aimed at preventing infestation, either by interfering with oviposition of females or by killing neonates before they bore into the stem. Our study tested insect and host plant derived stimuli that may affect the selection of oviposition sites by female X. quadripes.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 133 , Issue 3 , June 2001 , pp. 409 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duffy, E.A.J. 1953. A monograph of the immature stages of British and imported timber beetles (Cerambycidae). pp 6–47in British Museum (Natural History) Economic SeriesGoogle Scholar
Duffy, E.A.J. 1968. A monograph of the immature stages of oriental timber beetles (Cerambycidae). pp 202–7 in British Museum (Natural History) Economic SeriesGoogle Scholar
Gowda, D.K.S., Venkatesha, M.G., Bhat, P.K. 1992. Rearing of white stem borer, Xylotrechus quadripes Chev. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on freshly cut stems of Coffea arabica. Journal of Coffee Research 22: 69–72Google Scholar
Higgs, M.D., Evans, D.A. 1978. Chemical mediators in the oviposition behaviour of the house longhorn beetle, Hylotrupes bajulus. Experientia (Basel) 34: 46–7Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1959. Ecology of Cerambycidae. Annual Review of Entomology 4: 99–138Google Scholar
Martinez-Egea, J.M. 1982. Phoracantha semipunctata Fab. in south-western Spain: summary of the campaign to place trap trees. Boletin de la Estacion Central de Ecologia 11: 57–69Google Scholar
Miller, J.R., Cowles, R.S. 1990. Stimulo-deterrent diversion: a concept and its possible application to onion maggot control. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16: 3197–212Google Scholar
Montavon, R. 1997. Nestlé in China: technical assistance in agriculture and the development of coffee growing. Vevey, Switzerland: bNestec Ltd, B-Com-CI DepartmentGoogle Scholar
Paiva, M.R., Mateus, E., Farrall, M.H. 1993. Chemical ecology of Phoracantha semipuncta (Col., Cerambycidae): potential role in Eucalyptus pest management. Bulletin de l'Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique Contre les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles — Section Régionale Ouest Paléarctique 16: 72–7Google Scholar
Papp, R.P., Samuelson, G.A. 1981. Life history and ecology of Plagithmysus bilineatus, an endemic Hawaiian borer associated with Ohia Lehua (Myrtaceae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 74: 387–91Google Scholar
Rhainds, M., Lan, C.C., King, S., Gries, R., Mo, L.S., Gries G. 2001. Pheromone communication and mating behaviour of coffee white stem borer, Xylotrechus quadripes Chevrolat (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology. 36. In pressGoogle Scholar
Schoeman, P.S. 1990. Control of the white coffee stem borer. Inligtingsbulletin – Navorsingsinstituut vir Sitrus en Subtropiese Vrugte 220: 3–4Google Scholar
Venkatesha, M.G., Krishnamoorthy, P., Seetharama, H.G. 1995. Rearing of grubs of white stem-borer, Xylotrechus quadripes Chev. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on freshly cut stems of different species of coffee. Journal of Coffee Research 25: 42–7Google Scholar
Visitpanich, J. 1994. The biology and survival rate of the coffee stem borer, Xylotrechus quadripes Chevrolat (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Japanese Journal of Entomology 62: 731–45Google Scholar