Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T06:29:40.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suppression of Oviposition Rate of Scambus buolianae (Htg.) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), in Fluctuating Electrical Fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. G. Maw
M. G. Maw
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was suspected for many years that the electrical environment stimulates insect activity. Schùa (1952) found that alternating potentials caused guard bees to become hostile and foragers to increase their activity and food uptake. Levengood and Shinkle (1960) reported that the progeny yields of cultures of Drosophila melanogaster Meig. in an electric field were, on the average, higher than control groups and the effect of barometric pressure was considerably reduced. The present study was made to determine whether electrostatic fields of low intensity affected the oviposition rate of a hymenopterous parasite.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 93 , Issue 7 , July 1961 , pp. 602 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, A. P., and Juillet, J. A.. 1961. The introduced parasites of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae), with a critical evaluation of their usefulness as control agents. Canadian Ent. 93: 297–312.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. K. 1960. Effects of artificially produced atmospheric electrical fields upon the activity of some adult Diptera. Can. J. Zool. 53: 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leius, K. 1960. Attractiveness of different foods and flowers to the adults of some hymenopterous parasites. Canadian Ent. 92: 369–376.Google Scholar
Levengood, W. C., and Shinkle, M. P.. 1960. Environmental factors influencing progeny yields in Drosophila. Science 132: 34–35.Google Scholar
Shùa, L. 1952. Untersuchungen über deneinfluss meteorolozischer elements auf das perhalten. der honigbienen (Apis mellifica). Z. Vergl. Physiol. 34: 258–277.Google Scholar