Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T14:09:19.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Adult Feeding Habit of Some Conifer-infesting Weevils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

George H. Plumb
Affiliation:
Conn. Agr. Expt. Sta., New Haven, Conn.

Extract

During the course of examining a white pine tree on May 25, 1945, the writer noticed a small black weevil clinging to the sheath of a needle fascicle, on the current year's shoot. The weevil was in a position parallel to the fascicle, its head directed upward, and its beak resting against the needle sheath. Closer scrutiny revealed a droplet of resin about the tip of the beak, and several small holes in the sheath distal to the beetle. When the beetle was removed, it was in the act of boring another similar hole in the needle fascicle. A brief search resulted in the finding of additional weevils in the same position on other twigs. Since no weevil of this habit on pine could be called to mind, six specimens were collected and two more were taken on May 29.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Barbey, A.Traité d'Entomologie Forestière, pp. 101102, 226. Berger-Levrault, Paris-Nancy; 1913.Google Scholar
2.Blatchley, W. S. and Leng, C. W.. Rhyncophora or weevils of North Eastern America, pp. 253261. The Nature Publ. Co., Indianapolis; 1916.Google Scholar
3.Buchanan, L. L.A new North American Magdalis from blue spruce (Coleoptera Curculionidae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 36: 8587; 1934.Google Scholar
4.Chittenden, F. H.Notes on the habits of some species of Rhyncophora. Ent. Amer. 6: 167172; 1890.Google Scholar
5.Doane, R. W., Van Dyke, E. C., Chamberlin, W. J., and Burke, H. E.. Forest insects, p. 244. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York and London; 1936.Google Scholar
6.Eaton, C. B.Biology of the weevil Cylindrocopturus eatoni Buchanan, injurious to ponderosa and Jeffrey pine reproduction. Jour. Econ. Ent. 35(1): 2025; 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Eckstein, K.Brachonyx pineti Payk. (indigena Hbst.). Zeitschr. f. Forst.- u. Jagdw., 25. Jhrg.: 3638; 1893.Google Scholar
8.Escherich, K.Die Forstinsekten mitteleuropas, Zweit. Bd., pp. 411415, 420–422. Paul Parey, Berlin; 1923.Google Scholar
9.Escherich, K. und Baer, W.. Tharandter zoologische Miszellen, Erste Reihe, Nr. 4. Die Magdalis—arten an Fichte und Kiefer. Naturwiss. Zeitschr. f. Forst.—u. Landw., 6 Jhrg.: 514521; 1908.Google Scholar
10.Fall, H. C.A brief review of our species of Magdalis, with notes and descriptions of other North American Rhyncophora. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 39: 2372; 1913.Google Scholar
11.Felt, E. P.Insects affecting park and woodland trees. New York State Museum Mem. 8, vol. 2, pp. 402403; 1906.Google Scholar
12.Keen, F. P.Insect enemies of western forests. U.S.D.A. Misc. Publ. No. 213: 1209; 1938.Google Scholar
13.Lindemann, K. in Köppen, Fr. Th.. Die schädlichen Insecten Russlands, 527 pp. St. Petersburg; 1880.Google Scholar
14.Perris, E.Histoire des insectes du pin maritime. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 3rd. ser., IV: 245257, 423–486; 1856.Google Scholar
15.Pierce, W. D.The case of the genera Rhina and Magdalis. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 20: 7278; 1918.Google Scholar
16.Trägardh, I.Skogsentomologiska Bidrag. I. in Meddelander fran Statens Skogsförsoksanstalt Hafte 19: 361384; 1922.Google Scholar
17.Wichmann, H. E.Ueber Anthonomus varions Payk. Centralbl. f. d. ges. Forstw. 48: 1013; 1922.Google Scholar