Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:12:17.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESCRIPTION OF THE LARVA OF REMARTINIA SECRETA AND NOTES ON THE LARVA OF REMARTINIA LUTEIPENNIS FLORIDA (ODONATA: AESHNIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Rodolfo Novelo-Gutiérrez
Rodolfo Novelo-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Departamento de Entomología, Apartado Postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A detailed description and illustrations of the larva of Remartinia secreta (Calvert) are provided. The main features that distinguish the larva of this species are dark brown coloration; prementum 0.25 times longer than its widest part, with a dorsal row of small spiniform setae close to the lateral margins; length of the lateral spine on abdominal segment six 0.4–0.5 mm; lateral valvae of female gonapophyses shorter than central ones; and female epiproct longer than cerci. Larvae were found living in a lagoon densely covered by aquatic phanerogams such as Eichhornia sp. (Pontedereaceae) and Typha sp. (Thyphaceae). Larva of R. secreta is compared to that of Remartinia luteipennis florida (Hagen), its only sympatric congener.

Résumé

Une déscription détaillée et illustrée des larves de Remartinia secreta (Calvert) a été faite. Elles ont été récoltées dans une lagune couverte par des phanérogames aquatiques tels que Eichhornia sp. (Pontedereaceae) et Typha sp. (Typhaceae). Les principales caractéristiques pour les identifier sont coloration café foncé; prémentum 0,25 fois plus allongé que sa plus large partie, avec une rangée dorsale de fines soies épiniformes près des marges latérales; épine latérale du 6ième segment abdominal de 0,4–0,5 mm de longeur; et chez les femelles la gonapophyse a des valves latérales plus courtes que les centrales et l’épiproctum est plus long que les cerci. Les caractéristiques des larves de cette espèce ont été comparées avec celles de Remartinia luteipennis florida (Hagen), son congénère sympatrique unique.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 130 , Issue 6 , December 1998 , pp. 893 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calvert, P.P. 1956. The Neotropical species of the “subgenus Aeshna” sensu selysii 1883 (Odonata). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society 15: 1–251.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A.L. 1992. Revalidation of the genus Remartinia Navás, 1911, with the description of a new species and a key to the genera of neotropical Aeshnidae (Anisoptera). Odonatologica 21(3): 289–298.Google Scholar
Corbet, P.P. 1953. A terminology for the labium of larval Odonata. The Entomologist 86: 191–196.Google Scholar
Davies, D.A.L., and Tobin, P.. 1985. The dragonflies of the world: a systematic list of the extant species of the Odonata. Vol. 2. Anisoptera. Societas Internationalis Odonatologica Rapid Communications (Supplements) 5: 1–151.Google Scholar
González-Soriano, E., and Novelo-Gutiérrez, R.. 1996. Odonata. pp. 147–167in Llorente-Bousquets, J., García-Aldrete, A.N., and González-Soriano, E. (Eds.), Biodiversidad, taxonomía y biogeografía de artrópodos de México: Hacia una síntesis de su conocimiento. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.Google Scholar
Needham, J.G., and Westfall, M.J. Jr., 1955. A Manual of the Dragonflies of North America (Anisoptera). University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Paulson, D.R. 1982. Odonata. pp. 249–277in Hurlbert, S.H., and Villalobos-Figueroa, A. (Eds.), Aquatic Biota of Mexico, Central America and the West Indies. San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar