Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T18:51:30.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF THE GENUS EUDERUS OF AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Carl M. Yoshimoto
Carl M. Yoshimoto
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Euderus Haliday in America north of Mexico consists of five subgenera, Secodelloidea Girault, Euderus Haliday, Euderoides n. subgen., Neoeuderus n. subgen., and Leipocrossus n. subgen. and 25 species; 13 species are described as new and are as follows: Euderus (Secodelloidea) canadensis, E. (Euderoides) purpureus, E. (Neoeuderus) viridilineatus, E. (Neoeuderus) magnificus, E. (Leipocrossus) californicus, E. (Euderus) solidaginis, E. (Euderus) vockerothi, E. (Euderus) chillcotti, E. (Euderus) masoni, E. (Euderus) fuscedinellae, E. (Euderus) pecki, E. (Euderus) glaucus, and E. (Euderus) alaskensis. Species groups of albitarsis and solidaginis form two natural groupings within the genus Euderus s. str. Keys to subgenera and species, distribution, and host records are included.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 4 , April 1971 , pp. 541 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. 1887. Studies on the North American Chalcididae, with descriptions of new species, chiefly from Florida. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 14: 201.Google Scholar
Boučcek, Z. 1963. Studien über europäiche Eulophidae, III: Euderinae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Beitr. Ent. 13 (h. 3/4): 257–281.Google Scholar
Burks, B. D. 1967. In K. V. Krombein and B. D. Burks, Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico, synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2 (Suppl. 2), pp. 231–232.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. C. 1915 a. A new species of the genus Secodella. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 17: 100.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. C. 1915 b. The genus Secodella in North America. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 17: 142–144.Google Scholar
Gahan, B. D. 1927. Four new chalcidoid parasites of the Pine Tip Moth, Rhyacionia frustrana (Comstock). J. agric. Res. 34: 548–549.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1916. Notes on described chalcidoid Hymenoptera with new genera and species. Societas ent. 31: 35–38.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1917 a. Chalcidoidea Nova Marilandensis II. p. 1. Private Publ., Glenn Dale, Md.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1917 b. Three new chalcid flies from North America. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 12: 85–86.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1924. The North American species of Emersonopsis, Amestocharis, Euderus and Miromphalomyiia (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea). Ins. Inscit. Mens. 12: 94.Google Scholar
Graham, M. W. R. de V. 1959. Keys to the British genera and species of Elacherinae, Eulophinae, Entedontinae and Euderinae (Hym., Chalcidoidea). Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 13: 169–204.Google Scholar
Graham, K. 1944. The establishment of some imported parasites of the larch casebearer, Haploptilia laricella Hbn. in Ontario. 74th Ann. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont., pp. 48–52.Google Scholar
Miller, C. D. 1965. A new Nearctic species of Euderus Haliday (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Can. Ent. 94: 1070–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, O. 1951. In Muesebeck, C. F. W. et al. , Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico, synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2, p. 462.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1963. Catalogue of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. Suppl. 30, pp. 197–201.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1839. Monographia Chalciditum, I. London, 333 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, F. 1847. Characters of undescribed chalcidites collected in North America by E. Doubleday, and now in the British Museum. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 20: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar