Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T16:32:01.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EFFECTS OF PHOTOPERIOD, TEMPERATURE, AND FOOD SUPPLY ON RATE OF DEVELOPMENT AND DIAPAUSE IN COCCINELLA NOVEMNOTATA1,2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. D. McMullen
R. D. McMullen
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Summerland, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The optimum temperature for rate of development and survival of immature stages of Coccinella novemnotata Herbst was found to lie between 70° and 80°F. Different photoperiods between 10 and 18 hours per day did not influence rate of development or survival. With a 16-hour photoperiod the mean number of eggs laid per female and mean longevity of females were greater at 70° than at 80°F, but not significantly so. At 90°F egg production was sharply curtailed and most eggs produced were infertile, probably due to inactivation of sperm in the male. Photoperiods of 10, 12, and 18 hours per day induced diapause in a large percentage of adult females; intermediate photoperiods of 14 and 16 hours per day were much less effective. Low temperature and lesser amounts of food available to adult females increased the effectiveness of the short and the long photoperiods for inducing diapause. The stage susceptible to induction of diapause, or conversely the initiation of gonad maturation, was determined to be the young adult from emergence to 7 days of age. The results of experimental data are related to a field study of the biology of this insect in California.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 6 , June 1967 , pp. 578 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Faber, W. 1949. Biologische Untersuchungen zur Diapause des Kartoffelkafers (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say). Pflanzenschutzberichte 3: 65–95.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1962. Biology and ecology of predaceous Coccinellidae. A. Rev. Ent. 7: 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodek, I. 1957. Influence of temperature, relative humidity and photoperiodicity on the speed of development of Coccinella septempunctata L. Acta Soc. ent. czech. 55: 121–141.Google Scholar
Hodek, I., and Cerkasov, J.. 1961. Experimental influencing of the imaginal diapause in Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera). 7th contribution to the ecology of Coccinellidae. Acta Soc. zool. bohemoslov. 25: 70–90.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. 1955. The physiology of diapause in arthropods. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marvin, C. F., and Kimball, H. H.. 1931. Smithsonian Meteorological Tables. Fifth revised edition. Smithson. misc. Collns, Vol. 86.Google Scholar
Masaki, S. 1956. The local variation in the diapause pattern of the cabbage moth, Barathra brassicae Linne, with particular reference to the aestival diapause (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. Fac. Agric. Mie Univ. 13: 29–46.Google Scholar
McMullen, R. D. 1967. A field study of diapause in Coccinella novemnotata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Can. Ent. 99: 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, J. De. 1958. Perception of the photoperiod by the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say). Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. (1956). Vol. 2. pp. 213–218.Google Scholar
Wilde, J. De, Duintjir, C. S. and Mook, L.. 1959. Physiology of diapause in the adult Colorado potato beetle. I. The photoperiod as a controlling factor. J. Insect Physiol. 3: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, J. De. 1962. Photoperiodism in insects and mites. A. Rev. Ent. 7: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar