Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T19:04:54.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ETHANOL INDUCES ATTACK ON TREES BY SPRUCE BEETLES, DENDROCTONUS RUFIPENNIS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Henry A. Moeck
Henry A. Moeck
Affiliation:
Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, British Columbia V8Z 1M5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When 95% ethanol was sprayed at the rate of approximately 46 ml/m2 of bark surface on the lower 1 or 2 m of standing living spruce trees, Picea engelmannii Parry – P. glauca (Moench) Voss hybrid population, 23 of 47 and 18 of 19 treated trees in two areas received one to many spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby), attacks, whereas only 2 of 63 and 2 of 64 untreated trees, respectively, were attacked. Some of the treated trees were killed by mass attacks of the beetles, but most trees pitched out the attacks. Thus beetle attacks on essentially resistant trees were induced by the ethanol treatment. However, spruce beetles were not attracted by the ethanol treatment.

Résumé

À la suite d’un épandage d’éthanol à 95% à raison d’environ 46 mL/m2 de surface d’écorce sur 1 à 2 m de la base des arbres d’un peuplement d’épinette hybride (Picea engelmannii Parry – P. glauca (Moench) Voss), 23 des 47 et 18 des 19 arbres ainsi traités dans deux aires ont subi de une à plusieurs attaques du dendroctone de l’épinette (Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby)). Tandis que seulement 2 des 63 et 2 des 64, respectivement, des arbres non-traités ont subi des attaques. Certains arbres ont été tués par les attaques massives de dendroctones, mais la plupart d’entre eux y ont résisté. Donc, les attaques de dendroctones sur des arbres qui n’y sont pas sujets ont été provoquées par le traitement à l’éthanol. Toutefois, les dendroctones n’étaient pas attirés par le traitement à l’éthanol.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 10 , October 1981 , pp. 939 - 942
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, J. and Vité, J. P.. 1975. Host selection by Trypodendron lineatum. Naturwissenschaften 62: 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, F. G. 1952. Suggestions for future research in the control of ambrosia beetles. Malay. Forester 15: 197–206.Google Scholar
Buchanan, W. D. 1941. Experiments with an ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus germanus (Blfd.). J. econ. Ent. 34: 367–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cade, S. C., Hrutfiord, B. F., and Gara, R. I.. 1970. Identification of a primary attractant for Gnathotrichus sulcatus isolated from western hemlock logs. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1014–1015.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R. 1974. Taxonomic and ecologic relationships between Picea glauca and Picea engelmannii. Can. J. Bot. 52: 1545–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, W. J. and Massey, F. J. Jr., 1951. Introduction to Statistical Analysis. McGraw-Hill. 370 pp.Google Scholar
Gagne, J. A. and Kearby, W. H.. 1978. Host selection by Xyleborus celsus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Missouri. Can. Ent. 110: 1009–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerck, K. 1972. Äthylalkohol und Stammkontur als Komponenten der Primäranlockung bei Xyloterus domesticus L. (Col.: Scolytidae). Naturwissenschaften 59: 423.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L. and Wygant, N. D.. 1954. Biology and control of the Engelmann spruce beetle in Colorado. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Circ. 944. 35 pp.Google Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1975. Survey for Gnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in a commercial sawmill with the pheromone, sulcatol. Can. J. For. Res. 5: 586–591.Google Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1977. Attack by Gnathotrichus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on stumps and felled trees baited with sulcatol and ethanol. Can. Ent. 109: 675–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeck, H. A. 1970. Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 102: 985–995.Google Scholar
Moeck, H. A. 1971. Field test of ethanol as a scolytid attractant. Can. Dep. Fisheries & For., Bi-mon. Res. Notes 27: 11–12.Google Scholar
Moeck, H. A. 1978. Field test for primary attraction of the spruce beetle. Fisheries & Env. Canada, Forestry Service, Bi-mon. Res. Notes 34: 8.Google Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. 1973. Ambrosia beetle attacks delayed by turpentine oil. Env. Can., For. Serv., Bi-mon. Res. Notes 29: 36.Google Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. and Schönherr, J.. 1976. Chemical response behavior of scolytids in West Germany and western Canada. Env. Can., For. Serv., Bi-mon. Res. Notes 32: 31–32.Google Scholar
Norris, D. M. and Baker, J. M.. 1969. Nutrition of Xyleborus ferrugineus. I. Ethanol in diets as a tunneling (feeding) stimulant. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62: 592–594.Google Scholar
Pitman, G. B., Hedden, R. L., and Gara, R. I.. 1975. Synergistic effects of ethyl alcohol on the aggregation of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Col., Scolytidae) in response to pheromones. Z. Angew. Ent. 78: 203–208.Google Scholar
Roling, M. P. and Kearby, W. H.. 1975. Seasonal flight and vertical distribution of Scolytidae attracted to ethanol in an oak-hickory forest in Missouri. Can. Ent. 107: 1315–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1966. Observations on olfactory behavior of scolytid beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) associated with Douglas-fir forests. Z. angew. Ent. 58: 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, A. and Gara, R. I.. 1970. Estudios sobre la actividad de vuelo y selección de huespedes por Xyleborus spp. y Platypus spp. (Col.; Scolytidae y Platypodidae). Turrialba 20: 471–477.Google Scholar
Stoszek, K. J. 1973. A contribution to the biology of the Pseudohylesinus nebulosus (LeConte) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), especially in relation to the moisture stress of its host, Douglas-fir. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis. 121 pp.Google Scholar