Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:00:46.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPACT OF EMIGRATING SEED CHALCID, MEGASTIGMUS SPERMOTROPHUS WACHTL(HYMENOPTERA: TORYMIDAE), ON SEED PRODUCTION IN A DOUGLAS-FIR SEED ORCHARD IN FRANCE AND MODELLING OF ORCHARD INVASION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Marc Jarry ,
Jean-Noël Candau ,
Alain Roques  and
Bernard Ycart
Marc Jarry
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mathématiques Appliquées, URA CNRS 1204, IPRA-UPPA, av. de I'Universié, 64000 Pau, France
Jean-Noël Candau
Affiliation:
IBEAS-UPPA, Campus universitaire, 64000 Pau, France
Alain Roques
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Zoologie Forestière, Ardon, 45160 Olivet, France
Bernard Ycart
Affiliation:
LMCDMAG, B.P. 53 X, 38041 Grenoble, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The invasion of a Douglas-fir seed orchard by host-specific seed chalcids immigrating from the surrounding plantations of Douglas-fir has been monitored for a 10-year period. The orchard cone crop was entirely harvested every year to prevent the establishment of a resident chalcid population. Over the 10 years the percentage of infested seeds resulting from the immigration of seed chalcids ranged from 0.88 to 91.0%. A model to forecast the importance of annual seed orchard infestation by immigrating populations is proposed. This model is based on passive diffusion of females emerging in the surrounding plantations with a downwind drift. Only a few plantations located within a radius of 5 km from the orchard appeared to contribute significantly to orchard infestation. Settlement of Douglas-fir orchard in regions with low density of conspecific trees and annual harvest of cones are suggested to limit the importance and regularity of seed chalcid damage.

Résumé

L’invasion annuelle d’un verger à graines de sapin de Douglas par des chalcidiens spéficiques des graines émigrants de peuplements de Douglas périphériques au verger a été suivie pendant 10 ans. Tous les cônes du verger ont été recoltés chaque année afin de prévenir l’installation d’une population résidente de chalcidiens. Le pourcentage d’attaque des graines résultant de l’attaque des insectes immigrants dans le verger a largement varié selon l’année, allant de 0,88 à 91,0% des graines pleines. Un modèle prévisionnel de l’invasion annuelle du verger par les populations environnantes de chalcidiens est proposé. Ce modèle est fondé sur un processus de diffusion passive des adultes avec dérive due au vent. Seul un nombre limité de plantations environnantes, toutes situées à l’intérieur d’un rayon de 5 km autour du verger, semblent contribuer significativement à l’infestation de ce dernier. L’établissement de vergers à graines de Douglas dans des zones pauvres en peuplements de la même essence et la récolte annuelle de tous les cônes du verger sont suggérés afin de diminuer les dégâts de chalcidiens.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 129 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 7 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annila, E. 1982. Diapause and population fluctuations in Megastigmus specularis Walley and M. spermotrophus Wachtl (Hymenoptera: Torymidae). Annales entomologici fennici 48: 33–36.Google Scholar
Candau, J.N., Roux, G., Jarry, M., and Roques, A.. 1995. Dynamics of invasion of Douglas-fir seed orchards by non-resident insect populations in Europe. pp. 587–609in Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference “Behaviour, Population Dynamics and Control of Forest Insects”, Hawaii, February 6–11, 1994.Google Scholar
Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York, NY. 900 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowsky, S.A., and Schowalter, T.D.. 1988. Inventory monitoring for estimating impact of insects on seed production in Douglas-fir orchard in Western Oregon. Journal of Economic Entomology 81: 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, R.A., Marsh, L.M., and Tuckwell, H.C.. 1982. Effect of field geometry on the spread of crop disease. Protection Ecology 4: 81–108.Google Scholar
Göttsche, A.B. 1977 a. Verhalten von Megastigmus bipunctatus (Hymenoptera chalcididae) bei der Wirts und Nahrungssuche. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 22: 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göttsche, A.B. 1977 b. Untersuchungen über Lebensdauer und Eivorrat der Wacholdersamen-wespe Megastigmus bipunctatus Swederus. Anzeiger für Schädlindgsunke, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 50: 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlin, A.F., Yates, H.O. III, Tovar-Cibrian, D., Ebel, B.H., Koerber, T.W., and Merkel, E.P.. 1980. Cones and Seed Insects of North American Conifers. Canadian Forest Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; US Forest Service, Washington, DC; Secretaria de Agricultura y Recursos Hidraulicos, Mexico. 122 pp.Google Scholar
Hohn, M.E., Liebhold, A.M., and Gribko, L.S.. 1993. Geostatistical model for forecasting spatial dynamics of defoliation caused by the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environmental Entomology 22(5): 1066–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, J.B., and Haverty, M.I.. 1988. Pest Management in Douglas-fir Seed Orchards: A Micro-computer Decision Method. US Forest Service General Technical Report PSW–108: 29 pp.Google Scholar
Hussey, N.W. 1955. The life history of Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) and its principal parasite, with descriptions of the developmental stages. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 106: 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, N.W. 1956. The extent of seed loss in Douglas-fir caused by Megastigmus spermotrophus. Scottish Forestry 10: 191–197.Google Scholar
Jarry, M., Candau, J.N., Ycart, B., and Roques, A.. 1997. Colonization of a Douglas-fir seed orchard by an insect pest, Megastigmus spermotrophus: Modeling migration processes. In Arino, O., Axelrod, D., and Kimmel, M. (Eds.), Mathematical Population Dynamics, Vol. 3. Wuerz. In press.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P.M. 1983. Local movement in herbivorous insects: Applying a passive diffusion model to mark-capture-recapture field experiments. Oecologia 57: 322–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloeden, P.E., and Platen, E.. 1989. A survey of numerical methods for stochastic differential equations. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 3: 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessman, D. 1974. Ein Beitrag zur Verbreitung und Lebensweise von Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl und M. bipunctatus Swederus (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 75: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion-Poll, F., and Thiéry, D.. 1997. Olfactory sensitivity of Douglas-fir seed chalcids to plant odours. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Cone and Seed Insects Conference, Beijing (China) 1992. In press.Google Scholar
McManus, M.L. 1988. Weather, behaviour and insect dispersal. pp. 71–94 in Sahota, T.S., and Holling, C.S. (Compilers), Paths from a Viewpoint: The Wellington Festschrift on Insect Ecology. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 146: 213 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, G.E. 1986. Distribution of Contarina oregonensis Foote (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) eggs in Douglas-fir orchards and a method for estimating egg density. The Canadian Entomologist 188: 1291–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niwa, C.G., and Overhulser, D.L.. 1992. Oviposition and development of Megastigmus spermotrophus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) in unfertilized seeds. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 2323–2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okubo, A. 1980. Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Models. Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Rappaport, N.G., Mori, S., and Roques, A.. 1993. Estimating impact of a seed chalcid Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) on Douglas-fir seed production: A new paradigm. Journal of Economic Entomology 86: 845–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, N.G., and Roques, A.. 1991. Resource use and clonal differences in attack rate by the Douglas-fir seed chalcid, Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl (Hymenoptera: Torymidae), in France. The Canadian Entomologist 123: 1219–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, L.M. 1986. Stochastic population theory: Diffusion processes. Biomathematics 17: 191–238.Google Scholar
Roques, A. 1981. Biologie et répartition de Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Torymidae) et des autres insectes liés aux cônes dans les peuplements forestiers et vergers à graines français du sapin de Douglas, Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco. Acta Oecologia, Oecologia Applicata 2: 161–180.Google Scholar
Roques, A. 1986. Dynamique d'infestation des nouveaux vergers à graines de Douglas du Sud de la France par le chalcidien ravageur Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl (Hymenoptera: Torymidae). pp. 685–694in 18th IUFRO World Congress, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
Roques, A. 1987. Interaction between visual and olfactory signals in cone recognition by insect pests. pp. 153–160in Labeyrie, V., Fabres, G., and Lachaise, D. (Eds.), Insects–Plants 1986. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Roques, A. 1988. La spécificité des relations entre cônes de conifères et insectes inféodés en Europe occidentale: Un exemple d'étude des interactions plantes–insectes. Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat ès Sciences, Université Pau, France. 242 pp.Google Scholar
Roux, G. 1995. Etude comparative des mécanismes d'induction de la diapause prolongée chez quelques insectes spécifiques des cônes dè conifères. Ph.D. thesis, Université Orléans, France. 100 pp.Google Scholar
Schneider, I. 1985. Wirtsfindung und Eiablage einiger Megastigmus-Arten, ein Beispiel für K-orientierte Fortpflanzungsstrategie bei Bewohnern extremer ökologischer Nischen. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 100: 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schowalter, T.D. 1994. Cone and seed insect phenology in a Douglas-fir seed orchard during three years in Western Oregon. Environmental Entomology 87: 758–765.Google Scholar
Sellenchlo, U., and Wall, I.. 1984. Die Erzwespen Mitteleuropas: System, Biologie und Bibliographie der Torymidae und Ormyridae. E. Bauer Publishers, Keltern. 110 pp.Google Scholar
Stinner, R.E., Barfield, C.S., Stimac, J.L., and Dhose, L.. 1983. Dispersal and movement of insect pests. Annual Review of Entomology 28: 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, J.D., and Miller, G.E.. 1989. Distribution of Barbara colfaxiana (Kearfott) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) eggs within and among Douglas-fir crowns and methods for estimating egg density. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turgeon, J.J., Roques, A., and de Groot, P.. 1994. Insect fauna of coniferous seed cones: Diversity, host plant interactions and management. Annual Review of Entomology 39: 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar