Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T15:23:16.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of weather parameters on crucifer flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) capture heights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

James A. Tansey ,
Lloyd M. Dosdall ,
Julie J. Soroka  and
B. Andrew Keddie
James A. Tansey*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5.
Lloyd M. Dosdall
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5.
Julie J. Soroka
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
B. Andrew Keddie
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, CW 405, Biological Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: jtansey@ualberta.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is the most important pest of seedling canola, Brassica napus Linnaeus (Brassicaceae), in North America, yet effects of weather on its dispersal and flight activity are not completely understood. We investigated effects of ambient temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, barometric flux, and precipitation on capture heights of P. cruciferae over four site-years in Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. Capture heights increased with mean ambient temperatures for both generations of beetles, with 15°C determined as an estimated minimum temperature for flight. Although capture heights decreased with greater minimum relative humidity, and atmospheric pressure, and increased with greater mean wind speed, the contributions of these factors were determined to be minor relative to that of mean temperature. Results of the current study will contribute to more accurate predictions of the invasion of canola crops by P. cruciferae and contribute to improved integrated management of this important pest species.

Type
Insect Management
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 147 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 89 - 96
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Gilles Boiteau

References

Altieri, M.A. and Schmidt, L.L. 1986. Population trends and feeding preferences of flea beetles Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) in collard-wild mustard mixtures. Crop Protection, 5: 170–175.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2010. Canadian climate data. Historical climate data [online]. Available from http://climate.weather.gc.ca/index_e.html#access [accessed 24 March 2014].Google Scholar
Bodnaryk, R. and Lamb, R. 1991. Influence of seed size in canola, Brassica napus L. and mustard, Sinapis alba L., on seedling resistance against flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 71: 397–404.Google Scholar
Bonnemaison, L. 1957. Le charançon des siliques (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.) biologie et méthode de lutte. Annales des Épiphytes, 4: 387–543.Google Scholar
Burgess, L. 1977. Flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) attacking rape crops in the Canadian prairie provinces. The Canadian Entomologist, 109: 21–32.Google Scholar
CABI 1982. Distribution maps of plant pests, Phyllotreta cruciferae. Map 434. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Canola Council of Canada. 2014. Harvest acreage [online]. Available from http://www.canolacouncil.org/markets-stats/statistics/harvest-acreage/ [accessed 24 March 2014].Google Scholar
Dosdall, L., Dolinski, M., Cowle, N., and Conway, P. 1999. The effect of tillage regime, row spacing, and seeding rate on feeding damage by flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in canola in central Alberta, Canada. Crop Protection, 18: 217–224.Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M. and Mason, P.G. 2010. Key pests and parasitoids of oilseed rape or canola in North America and the importance of parasitoids in integrated management. In Biocontrol-based integrated management of oilseed rape pests. Edited by I.H. Williams. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. Pp. 167–213.Google Scholar
Dosdall, L.M. and Stevenson, F.C. 2005. Managing flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in canola with seeding date, plant density, and seed treatment. Agronomy Journal, 97: 1570–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2013. Bee health: EU-wide restrictions on pesticide use to enter into force on 1 December. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Fauske, G.M. 2006. Common flea beetles of North Dakota [online]. Available from http://www.ndsu.edu/ndmoths/Fleabeetles/alticini_home.htm [accessed 4 March 2014].Google Scholar
Feeny, P., Paauwe, K.L., and Demong, N.J. 1970. Flea beetles and mustard oils: host plant specificity of Phyllotreta cruciferae and P. striolata adults (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 63: 832–841.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P. 1982. Experimental and mathematical analyses of herbivore movement: quantifying the influence of plant spacing and quality on foraging discrimination. Ecological Monographs, 52: 261–282.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, G., Svec, H., Harris, C., and McEwen, F. 1979. Biology of the crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in southwestern Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist, 111: 1395–1407.Google Scholar
Knodel, J.J. and Olson, D.L. 2002. Crucifer flea beetle: biology and integrated pest management in canola. North Dakota State University Extension Service, Fargo, North Dakota, United States of America.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. 1983. Phenology of flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) flight in relation to their invasion of canola fields in Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist, 115: 1493–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J. 1984. Effects of flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera), on the survival, growth, seed yield and quality of canola, rape and yellow mustard. The Canadian Entomologist, 116: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliron, H. 1953. A European flea beetle injuring crucifers in North America. Economic Entomology, 46: 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oke, T.R. 2006. World Meteorological Organization. Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites. WMO/TD-No. 1250. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Ontario Beekeepers Association. 2013. Save the bees petition [online]. Avaliable from http://www.ontariobee.com/issues-and-advocacy/ongoing-issues-and-actions/spring-2012-bee-poisonings/save-the-bees-petition [accessed 15 November 2013].Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2008. Guide, STAT user’s guide version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Shtatland, E., Moore, S., and Barton, M. 2000. Why we need an R2 measure of fit (and not only one) in proc logistic and proc Genmod. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America. Paper 256–25.Google Scholar
Soroka, J.J., Otani, J.K., and Cárcamo, H.A. 2008. Crucifer-feeding flea beetle species composition across the prairies [abstract]. 58th Annual Meeting of the Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 19–22 October 2008. Entomological Society of America, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. P. 69.Google Scholar
Tansey, J.A., Dosdall, L.M., and Keddie, B.A. 2009. Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata responses to insecticidal seed treatments with different modes of action. Journal of Applied Entomology, 133: 201–209.Google Scholar
Tansey, J.A., Dosdall, L.M., Keddie, B.A., and Blake, A.J. 2012. A novel trapping system for monitoring insect flight heights. The Canadian Entomologist, 144: 617–620.Google Scholar
Tansey, J.A., Dosdall, L.M., Keddie, B.A., and Sarfraz, R. 2008. Differences in Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) responses to neonicotinoid seed treatments. Economic Entomology, 101: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tansey, J.A., Dosdall, L.M., Keddie, B.A., and Olfert, O. 2010. Flight activity and dispersal of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) are related to atmospheric conditions. Environmental Entomology, 39: 1092–1100. doi:10.1603/EN10026.Google Scholar
Toshova, T.B., Csonka, É., Subchev, M.A., and Tóth, M. 2009. The seasonal activity of flea beetles in Bulgaria. Journal of Pest Science, 82: 295–303.Google Scholar
Ulmer, B., and Dosdall, L. 2006. Emergence of overwintered and new generation adults of the crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Crop Protection, 25: 23–30.Google Scholar
Vänninen, I., Worner, S., Huusela-Veistola, E., Tuovinen, T., Nissinen, A., and Saikkonen, K. 2011. Recorded and potential alien invertebrate pests in Finnish agriculture and horticulture. Agricultural and Food Science, 20: 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. 1946. The effects of variations in atmospheric pressure upon insects. Canadian Journal of Research, 24: 51–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westdal, P. and Romanow, W. 1972. Observations on the biology of the flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Manitoba Entomologist, 6: 35–45.Google Scholar
Wooten, R. 2011. Statistical analysis of the relationship between wind speed, pressure and temperature. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11: 2712–2722.Google Scholar
Wylie, H.G. 1979. Observations on distribution, seasonal life history, and abundance of flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) that infest rape crops in Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist, 111: 1345–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar