Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:54:24.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ORIENTATION TO TRAILS BY A CARPENTER ANT, CAMPONOTUS MODOC (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE), IN A GIANT SEQUOIA FOREST1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. T. David  and
D. L. Wood
C. T. David
Affiliation:
Department of Entomological Sciences, University of California, Berkeley 94720
D. L. Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Entomological Sciences, University of California, Berkeley 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The trails of Camponotus modoc Wheeler follow perennial routes. The ants orient along these using both chemical and visual cues. If the chemical cues are disrupted the ants reform the trail while orienting by visual cues. They can respond to the same visual cues after at least 12 h, and since no evidence was found that the chemical cues survive the winter, probably after 6 months.

Résumé

Les sentiers de Camponotus modoc suivent des tracés à caractère pérenne. Les fournis s’orientent le long de ces tracés en utilisant des signaux chimiques et visuels. Si les signaux chimiques sont éliminés, les fourmis reconstituent le sentier en s’orientant à partir de signaux visuels. Elles peuvent répondre aux mêmes signaux visuels après au moins 12 h, et puisque rien n’indique que les signaux chimiques persistent durant l’hiver, probablement après 6 mois.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 112 , Issue 10 , 01 October 1980 , pp. 993 - 1000
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, G. A. 1973. Effect of Formica obscuripes on the predator-prey relationship between Hyperaspis congressis and Toumeyella numismaticum. Can. Ent. 105: 1113–1118.Google Scholar
Dobrzanska, J. 1966. The control of territory by Lasius fuliginosus Latr. Acta Biol. exp., Vars 26: 193–213.Google Scholar
Gaspar, Ch. 1967. Sur les pistes et les moeurs de Lasius fuliginosus Latr. Insectes soc. 14: 183–190.Google Scholar
Gotwald, W. H. Jr. , 1968. Food gathering behavior of the ant Camponotus noveboracensis (Fitch). Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 76: 278–296.Google Scholar
Hartwick, E. B., Friend, W. G., and Atwood, C. E.. 1977. Trail-laying behaviour of the carpenter ant, Camponotus pennsylvanicus. Can. Ent. 109: 129–136.Google Scholar
Holldobler, B. 1971. Homing in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex badius. Science, N.Y. 171: 1149–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holldobler, B. 1976. Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1: 3–44.Google Scholar
Jander, R. 1957. Die optische Richtungsorientierung der Roten Waldameise (Formica rufa). Z. vergl. Physiol. 40: 162–238.Google Scholar
SirLubbock, J. 1884. Ants, bees and wasps. Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner, London.Google Scholar
Marak, G. E. and Wolken, J. J.. 1965. An action spectrum for the fire ant. (Solenopsis saevissima). Nature, Lond. 205: 1328–1329.Google Scholar
Pricer, J. L. 1908. The life history of the carpenter ant. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab. Woods Hole 14: 177–218.Google Scholar
Rosengren, R. 1971. Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behaviour in foraging wood ants of the genus Formica. Acta zool. fenn. 133: 1–106.Google Scholar
Rundel, P. W. 1971. Community structure and stability in the Giant Sequoia groves of the Sierra Nevada, California. Am. Midl. Nat. 85: 478–492.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1970. The distribution of carpenter ant colonies in the spruce-fir forests of northwestern Ontario. Ecology 51: 865–873.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Sudd, J. H. 1967. An Introduction to the Behaviour of Ants. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Tilles, D. A. 1979. The symbiotic interrelationships between the carpenter ant, Camponotus modoc and aphids in the genus Cinara in a giant sequoia ecosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley. 98 pp.Google Scholar
Traniello, J. F. A. 1977. Recruitment behaviour and the organization of foraging in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus DeGeer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 61–79.Google Scholar