Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:30:50.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SPERMATOPHORE NUMBER IN THE CODLING MOTH CYDIA POMONELLA (L.) (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J Franklin Howell
J Franklin Howell
Affiliation:
Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Yakima, Washington, USA98902
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wild codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), females were trapped from May through September in the upper (Yakima) and lower (White Swan) Yakima River Basin, WA, using 10 bait traps and 4 and 19 blacklight traps, respectively, for 2 and 5 years in abandoned apple orchards. The average spermatophore count per female at Yakima was 1.08; at White Swan it was 1.76. The spermatophore count was similar in both first (0.97 and 1.79) and second (1.00 and 1.70) generations at both locations. Regression analysis of field data and laboratory tests showed that cool temperatures reduced the number of spermatophores, which reflect reduced mating. There was a high correlation between the number of small spermatophores and females with multiple spermatophores. Usually females with a large spermatophore mated only once. Females usually mated on the 1st day following emergence. Once mated, even females with small spermatophores seldom mated again on subsequent days.

Résumé

Des femelles sauvages du carpocapse de la pomme, Cydia pomonella (L.) ont été piégées de mai à septembre dans le haut (Yakima) et le base (White Swan) du bassin de la rivière Yakima, Etat de Washington, à l’aide de 10 pièges appâtés, et de 4 ou 19 pièges à "lumière noire", respectivement, pendant 2 ou 5 ans dans des pommeraies abandonnés. Le nombre de spermatophores par femelle à Yakima était de 1,08 et de1,76 à White Swan. Dans les deux sites, ce nombre était similaire en première (0,97 et 1,79) et en seconde génération (1,00 et 1,70). L’analyse de régression des donnés du terrain et des lests de laboratoire ont montré que les basses températures réduisent le nombre de spermatophores, indiquant une baisse de l’incidence d’accouplement. On a observé une forte corrélation entre le nombre de petits spermatophores et l’incidence des femelles avec plusieurs spermatophores. Normalement, les femelles avec un gros spermatophore ne s’accouplaient qu’une seule fois. Les femelles s’accouplaient généralement le jour suivant l’émergence. Une fois accouplées même les femelles avec petits spermatophores s ’accouplaient rarement les jours subséquents.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 8-9 , September 1988 , pp. 701 - 710
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benz, G. 1970. The influence of the presence of individuals of the opposite sex, and some other stimuli on sexual activity, oogenesis and oviposition in five lepidopterous species. Colloq. Int. C.N.R.S. 189. Paris. pp. 175–205.Google Scholar
Castrovillo, P.J., and Cardé, R.T.. 1979. Environmental regulation of female calling and male pheromone response periodicities in the codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella). J. Insect Physiol. 25: 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deseo, K.B. 1971. Study of factors influencing the fecundity and fertility of codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella L., Lepidoptera:Tortricidae). Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 6: 243–252.Google Scholar
Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.Google Scholar
Ferro, D.N., and Akre, R.D.. 1975. Reproductive morphology and mechanics of mating of the codling moth, Laspeyresia pomonella. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluri, P., Mani, E., Wildbolz, Th., and Arn, H.. 1974. Untersuchungen uber das Paarungsverhalten des Apfelwicklers (Laspeyresia pomonella L.) und uber den Einfluss von Kunstlichem Sexuallockstoff auf die Kopulation-shaufigkeit. Mitt. Schweiz. Ent. Ges. 47: 253–259.Google Scholar
Gehring, R.D., and Madsen, H.F.. 1963. Some aspects of the mating and oviposition behavior of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella. J. econ. Ent. 56: 140–143.Google Scholar
Geier, P.W. 1960. Physiological age of codling moth females (Cydia pomonella (L.)) caught in bait and light traps. Nature 185: 709.Google Scholar
Hamstead, E.O., and Gould, E.. 1950. Codling moth oocyte studies. J. econ. Ent. 43: 724–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J F. 1981. Codling moth: blacklight trapping comparisons with fermenting molasses bait and sex pheromone traps. USDA, ARS, ARR-W-22. 14 pp.Google Scholar
Howell, J F., Hutt, R.B., and Hill, W.B.. 1978. Codling moth: mating behavior in the laboratory. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 71: 891–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J F., and Thorp, K.D.. 1972. Influence of mating on attractiveness of female codling moths. Environ. Ent. 1: 125–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, S.C. 1959. The use of bait pans for codling moth trapping. E.M. 1964. Coop. Ext. Ser., Washington State Univ. Pullman, WA.3 pp.Google Scholar
Hutt, R.B., and White, L.D.. 1974. Codling moth: effect of 0 and 38 Krad of gamma irradiation on the mating capacity of males. Environ. Ent. 3: 645–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E.F. 1979. The basic principles of insect population suppression and management. USDA Agric. Handb. 512. 659 pp.Google Scholar
Nowosielski, J.W., Suski, Z.W., and Koslinska, M.. 1977. Observations on the mating behaviour of the codling moth, Laspeyresia pomonella (L.) 1. Duration of copulation and estimation of mating frequency. Ekol. Pol. 25: 333–340.Google Scholar
Proverbs, M.D., Logan, D.M., and Carty, B.E.. 1973. Some biological observations related to codling moth control by the sterility principle. pp. 149–163in Computer Models and Application of the Sterile Male Technique. Int. Atomic Energy Agency PL-466/16, Vienna.Google Scholar
Proverbs, M.D., Newton, J.R., and Logan, D.M.. 1966. Orchard assessment of the sterile male technique for control of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Ent. 98: 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A.S. 1974. Gamma radiation and insemination in the codling moth, Laspeyresia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Ent. Exp. Appl. 17: 425–432.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J.H.. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. McGraw Hill, New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J.. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard, Cambridge. 547 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L.D., Proshold, F., Holt, G.G., Mantey, K.D., and Hutt, R.B.. 1975. Codling moth: mating and sperm transfer in females paired with irradiated and unirradiated males. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 859–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar