Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T22:28:52.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SURVIVAL OF AEDES LARVAE IN CONSTANT AREA PONDS IN SOUTHERN ALBERTA (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. Pritchard  and
P. J. Scholefield
G. Pritchard
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
P. J. Scholefield
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mosquito eggs were hatched by artificially flooding dry pond beds and estimates of population size were made through larval development for one population of Aedes spencerii, two of A. cataphylla, and three of A. vexans. Overall daily mortality rates were between 8 and 21% and survival to the pupal stage was generally less than 20%, even though water levels were maintained. Mortality appeared to be higher in early larval stages than in later larval stages. Predation was unimportant and survival rate may have depended on food supply or temperature or an interaction between the two. In normal ponds populations often suffer heavy mortality when ponds dry up before development is complete. A. cataphylla, a spring species, developed faster than A. vexans, a summer species, at low temperatures but more slowly at high temperatures.

Résumé

L'éclosion d'oeufs de moustiques a été provoquée par l'inondation artificielle du lit asséché d'étangs, et des estimés du niveau de population ont été faits durant tout le développement larvaire pour une population d'Aedes spencerii, deux d'A. cataphylla et trois d'A. vexans. Le taux journalier de mortalité globale a varié de 8 à 21%, et la survie au stade pupal était généralement inférieure à 20%, bien que le niveau d'eau ait été maintenu. La mortalité a semblé plus élevée chez les stades larvaires jeunes que chez les stades larvaires avancés. La prédation était sans importance, et le taux de survie a semblé dépendre de l'abondance de la nourriture, de la température, ou d'une interaction des deux. Dans les étangs normaux les populations subissent souvent une mortalité élevée lorsque l'étang s'assèche avant que le développement ne soit complet. A. cataphylla, une espèce printannière, s'est développée plus rapidement qu'A. vexans, espèce estivale, à basse température, mais plus lentement à des températures élevées.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , February 1983 , pp. 183 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chumbachi, R. 1979. An analysis of the generation-mean life table of the mosquito, Culex tritaeniorhynchus summorosus, with particular reference to population regulation. J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 681–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, M. A. and Pritchard, G.. 1977 a. Methods for sampling immature stages of Aedes spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) in temporary ponds. Can. Ent. 109: 1435–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, M. A. 1977 b. Estimates of population size and survival of immature stages of four species of Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a temporary pond. Can. Ent. 109: 1425–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, M. E. and McClelland, G. A. H.. 1979. Systems analysis of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. Fortschr. Zool. 25: 355–388.Google ScholarPubMed
Iversen, T. M. 1971. The ecology of a mosquito population (Aedes communis) in a temporary pool in a Danish beech wood. Arch. Hydrobiol. 69: 309–332.Google Scholar
James, H. G. 1961. Some predators of Aedes stimulans (Walker) and Aedes trichurus (Dyar) (Diptera: Culicidae) in woodland pools. Can. J. Zool. 30: 535–540.Google Scholar
James, H. G. 1966. Insect predators of univoltine mosquitoes in woodland pools of the pre-Cambrian Shield in Ontario. Can. Ent. 98: 550–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahkani, K. H. and Service, M. W.. 1974. Estimated mortalities of the immature stages of Aedes cantans (Mg.) (Diptera: Culicidae) in a natural habitat. Bull. ent. Res. 64: 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, D. D. 1965. Aspects of the biology of Opifex fuscus Hutton (Diptera: Culicidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 40: 9–14.Google Scholar
Mori, A. and Wada, Y.. 1978. The seasonal abundance of Aedes albopictus in Nagasaki. Trop. Med. 20: 29–37.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, N. V. 1980. Preimaginal mortality in northern populations of mosquitoes of the genus Aedes. Soviet. J. Ecol. 10: 218–222.Google Scholar
Pritchard, G. and Scholefield, P. J.. 1980. Efficiency of the Enfield sampler for estimates of larval and pupal mosquito populations. Mosq. News 40: 383–387.Google Scholar
Reisen, W. K. 1975. Intraspecific competition in Anopheles stephensi Liston. Mosq. News 35: 473–482.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. 1968. The ecology of the immature stages of Aedes detritus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. appl. Ecol. 5: 613–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. 1971. Studies on sampling larval populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 45: 169–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. 1973. Study of the natural predators of Aedes cantans (Meigen) using the precipitin test. J. med. Ent. 10: 503–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. 1976. Mosquito Ecology. Field Sampling Methods. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. 1977 a. Mortalities of the immature stages of species B of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Kenya: comparison between rice fields and temporary pools, identification of predators, and effects of insecticidal spraying. J. med. Ent. 13: 535–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. 1977 b. Ecological and biological studies on Aedes cantans (Meig.) (Diptera: Culicidae) in southern England. J. appl. Ecol. 14: 159–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, J. D. and Pritchard, G.. 1979. A stepwise computer program for estimating development time and survival of Aedes vexans (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae and pupae in field populations in southern Alberta. Can. Ent. 111: 1241–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E., Murdie, G., Yasuno, M., Tann, R. J., and Reader, P. M.. 1972. Studies on the life budget of Aedes aegypti in Wat Samphaya, Bangkok, Thailand. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 46: 211–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Wagner, V. E. and Newson, H. D.. 1975. Field investigations on Aedes fitchii mosquito populations in a woodland pool ecosystem. Mosq. News 35: 518–522.Google Scholar
Wiberg-Larsen, P. 1978. Species composition, succession of instars and mortality among immature stages of Aedes spp. inhabiting some Danish forest pools. Arch. Hydrobiol. 84: 180–198.Google Scholar
Yates, M. G. 1979. The biology of the tree-hole breeding mosquito Aedes geniculatus (Olivier) (Diptera: Culicidae) in southern England. Bull. ent. Res. 69: 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar