Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:56:20.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three New Ontario Black Flies of the Genus Prosimulium (Diptera: Simuliidae): Part I. Descriptions, Morphological Comparisons with Related Species, and Distribution1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. D. Syme  and
D. M. Davies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Chromosonial studies have elucidated phylogenetic relations in Drosophila (White, 1954), culicids (Jucci, 1952) and chironomids (Bauer, 1936, 1945). Since it appeared promising to apply this approach to the Simuliidae, Rothfels and Dunbar (1953) began a cytological survey of the black flies of eastern Canada during the summer of 1951. They found that in this group the giant salivary gland chromosomes provided “a wealth of descriptive morphological detail in their number and gross morphology, in the characteristics of expanded centromere regions, in the location of specific nucleolar sites, in the degree of pairing of constituents, and in the ultimate discernible banding pattern…. Since these features are not functionally related to the external environment, the confusing effects of convergence are minimized, resemblances may be taken to indicate relation, and grouping is possible according to natural affinities” (Rothfels and Dunbar, 1953).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 90 , Issue 12 , December 1958 , pp. 697 - 719
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, H. 1936. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Morphologie der Speicheldrüsenchromosomen. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Allgem. Zool. u. Physiol. Tiere. 56: 239–276.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. 1945. Chromosomen und Systematik bei Chironomiden. Arch Hydrobiol. 40: 994–1008.Google Scholar
Beirne, B. P. 1955. Collecting, preparing and preserving insects. Can. Dept. Agric. Publ. 932: 1–133.Google Scholar
Davies, D. M. 1949. Variation in taxonomic characters of some Simuliidae (Diptera). Can. Ent. 81: 18–21.Google Scholar
Davies, L. 1957. A new Prosimulium species from Britain, and a re-examination of P. hirtipes (Fries) from the holarctic region. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 26: 1–10.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. W. 1958. The salivary gland chromosomes of two sibling species of black flies included in Eusimulium aureum Fries. Can. J. Zool. 36: 23–44.Google Scholar
Dyar, H. G., and Shannon, R. C. 1927. The North American two-winged flies of the family Simuliidae. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 69: 1–54.Google Scholar
Gatenby, J. B., and Beams, H. W. 1950. The microtomist's Vade Mecum. 11th ed.The Blakiston Co. Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
Grenier, P. 1947. Notes morphologiques et biologiques sur quelques simulies nouvelles pour la faune française. Bull Soc. ent. France 52: 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imms, A. D. 1944. On the constitution of the maxilla and labium in Mecoptera and Diptera. Quart J. micr. Sci. (N.S.) 85: 73–96.Google Scholar
Jobling, B. 1928. Structure of the head and mouth parts in Culicoides pulicaris (Diptera: Nematocera). Bull. ent. Res. 18: 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsen, O. A. 1903. Aquatic insects in New York State. Part 6. Aquatic nematocerous Diptera. N.Y. State Mus. Bull. 68: 328–441.Google Scholar
Jucci, C. 1952. Citogenetica degli anofeli: sua importanza per la malariologia, (English Summary). Symposia Genetica (U. Pavia) 3: 266–289.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1914. American black flies or buffalo gnats. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Ent. Tech. Ser. 26: 1–72.Google Scholar
Newcomer, E. H. 1953. A new cytological and histological fixing fluid. Science 118: 161.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. P. 1945. The morphology of the mouthparts of the non-biting blackfly, Eusimulium dacotense D. & S., as compared with those of the biting species Simulium venustum Say (Diptera: Simuliidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 38: 281–297.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. P., and Mickel, C. E. 1950. The black flies of Minnesota. Univ. Minn. Agric. Expt. Stat. Tech. Bull. 192: 1–64.Google Scholar
Novak, V. 1956. [A note on the black flies of Czechoslovakia]. (In Czech). Vestnik Ceskoslovenske Zool. Spolec. Acta Soc. Zool. Bohemoslovenicae 20: 224–248.Google Scholar
Puri, I. M. 1925. On the life history and structure of the early stages of Simuliidae (Diptera, Nematocera). Parts I–II. Parasit. 17: 295–369.Google Scholar
Rothfels, K. H. 1956. Black flies: siblings, sex, and species grouping. J. Hered. 47: 113–122.Google Scholar
Rothfels, K. H., and Dunbar, R. W. 1953. The salivary gland chromosomes of the black fly Simulium vittatum Zett. Can. J. Zool. 31: 226–241.Google Scholar
Rubtzov, I. A. 1940. [Fauna of U.S.S.R. Insects (Diptera). Black flies (family Simuliidae)]. In Russian. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., (N.S.23) 6(6): 1–532.Google Scholar
Rubtzov, I. A. 1956. [Fauna of U.S.S.R. Insects (Diptera). Black flies (family Simuliidae)]. In Russian. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., (N.S. 64) 6(6): 1–860.Google Scholar
Sommerman, K. M. 1953. Identification of Alaskan black fly larvae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 55: 258–273.Google Scholar
Stone, A. 1952. The Simuliidae of Alaska (Diptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 54: 69–96.Google Scholar
Stone, A., and Jamnback, H. A. 1955. The black flies of New York State. N.Y. State Mus. Bull. 349: 1–144.Google Scholar
Twinn, C. R. 1936. The black flies of eastern Canada. Can. J. Res., D. 14: 97–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. D. 1954. Animal cytology and evolution. 2nd ed.Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar