Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:24:13.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weather and the Success of Parasites in Population Regulation1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Paul DeBach
Affiliation:
Department of Biological C,ontrol, University of California, Riverside

Abstract

Examples and data based on the host-parasite complex of the California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell), and its parasites in untreated test plots in the citrus areas of southern California, not including the San Joaquin Valley and the desert areas, show the following: (1) Weather does not impose upper limits to host population increase. (2) In areas of favorable weather, certain parasites regulate host population densities at very low levels, other factors also being favorable. (3) The parasite Aphytis lingnanensis Compere is affected by weather differentially with respect to the host, and to varying degrees in different localities. The effects of field weather for each 2-week period of the year on all stages of this parasite individually as well as on population growth in held experimental cages are discussed. Adverse effects of weather on the parasite preclude successful population regulation of the host by the parasite at certain times or in particular areas but the range of the parasite is not restricted. (4) Another parasite, Comperiella bifasciata Howard, has its range restricted by weather and not by competition with other parasites to intermediate and interior citrus growing areas. It is never found along the coast. (5) Yet another parasite, Prospaltella perniciosi Tower, has its range restricted by competition and not by weather although it gives the appearance of being restricted by weather because it occurs only in coastal districts. (6) Examples are discussed of interactions between weather and dust, ants, or chemicals with parasites and hosts which result in various modifications of the abundance of the host and parasites. (7) Examples are discussed of the effect of weather on interactions between competing species of parasites and the host which have resulted in striking modifications of the previous distribution of certain parasites.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeBach, P., Dietrick, E. J. and Fleschner, C. A.. 1951. Ants vs. biological control of citrus pests. Calif. Citrograph 36: 312, 347348.Google Scholar
DeBach, P., Fisher, T. W. and Landi, J.. 1955. Some effects of meteorological factors on all stages of Aphytis lingnanensis, a parasite of the California red scale. Ecology 36(4): 743753.Google Scholar
DeBach, P., and Landi, J.. 1961. The introduced purple scale parasite, Aphytis lepidosaphes Compere, and a method of integrating chemical with biological control. Hilgardia 31(14): 459497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P., and Sundby, R. A.. 1963. Competitive displacement between ecological homologues. Hilgardia 34(5): 105166.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species, 3rd ed. Columbia Univ. Press. New York. 364 pp.Google Scholar
Huffaker, C. B., and Messenger, P. S.. 1964. The concept and significance of natural control. Chap. 4, p. 83. In DeBach, Paul (ed.), Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Chapman & Hall, London. 844 pp.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. E. 1955. The relative control values of different percentage mortalities. Bull. Ent. Res. 46(1): 189191.Google Scholar