Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:46:48.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Z-11-TETRADECENYL ACETATE: SEX ATTRACTANT OF AGAPETA ZOEGANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE), A POTENTIAL SPECIES FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF KNAPWEED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. Tôth ,
P.M. Guerin ,
H.-R. Buser ,
H. Müller ,
G. Szöcs ,
G. Sziráki  and
H. Arn
M. Tôth
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Plant Protection, Pf. 102, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary
P.M. Guerin
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Research Station for Fruit-Growing, Viticulture and Horticulture, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland
H.-R. Buser
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Research Station for Fruit-Growing, Viticulture and Horticulture, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland
H. Müller
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, CH-2800 Delémont, Switzerland
G. Szöcs
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Plant Protection, Pf. 102, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary
G. Sziráki
Affiliation:
Enterprise for Extension in Fruit Growing and Ornamentals, Pf. 108, H-1775 Budapest, Hungary
H. Arn
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Research Station for Fruit-Growing, Viticulture and Horticulture, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Canada, 78 of the most important weed species are introductions from Eurasia (Frankton and Mulligan 1970). Classical biological control aims to reduce the density of alien weeds below the economic threshold through introduction of specific herbivores from the native distribution area (Peschken 1979). During extended field surveys in central and southeastern Europe, the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control established the root-mining tortricid Agapeta zoegana Haw. as a promising control agent for Centaurea diffusa Lam. and C. maculosa Lam., 2 important ranch weeds in southwestern Canada (Harris and Myers 1984) and the northwestern United States (Maddox 1982). Due to the limited host range and suitable climatic conditions this moth was chosen for introduction into North America (Müller et al. 1982; Müller 1984). We wish to report an attractant that may be used to monitor the establishment of this beneficial species in its new habitat.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 117 , Issue 9 , September 1985 , pp. 1163 - 1165
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arn, H., Rauscher, S., and Schmid, A.. 1979. Sex attractant formulations and traps for the grape moth Eupoecilia ambiguella Hb. Mitt. Schweiz. ent. Ges. 52: 49–55.Google Scholar
Arn, H., Städler, E., and Rauscher, S.. 1975. The electroantennographic detector — a sensitive and selective tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones. Z. Naturforsch. 30: 722–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booij, C.J.H., and Voerman, S.. 1984. New sex attractants for 35 tortricid and 4 other lepidopterous species, found by systematic field screening in the Netherlands. J. chem. Ecol. 10: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankton, C., and Mulligan, G.A.. 1970. Weeds of Canada. Canada Dept. Agric. Publ. 948.Google Scholar
Guerin, P., Arn, H., and Buser, H.R.. 1985. Characterization of some tortricid sex pheromones using the insect antenna as a gas chromatographic detector. pp. 239–250 in Acree, T.E., and Soderlund, D.M. (Eds.), Semiochemistry: flavors and pheromones. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harris, P., and Myers, J.H.. 1984. Centaurea diffusa L. and C. maculosa Lam. diffuse and spotted knapweed (Compositae). Pest status. In Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux (Ed.), Biological Control Programmes Against Insects and Weeds in Canada 1969–1980. 288 pp.Google Scholar
Maddox, D.M. 1982. Biological control of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and spotted knapweed (C. maculosa). Weed Sci. 30: 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. 1984. Die Strukturanalyse der Wurzelphytophagenkomplexe von Centaurea maculosa Lam. und C. diffusa Lam. (Compositae) in Europa und Interaktionen zwischen wichtigen Phytophagenarten und ihren Wirtspflanzen. Inauguraldissertation der Universität Bern.Google Scholar
Müller, H., Schroeder, D., and Gassmann, A.. 1982. Investigations on Agapeta zoegana L. (Lep. Cochylidae), a possible biocontrol agent of spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam. (Compositae) in Canada, Final Report, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Delémont.Google Scholar
Peschken, D.P. 1979. Biologische Unkrautbekämpfung in Kanada mit Hilfe von Insekten und Nematoden. Z. angew. Ent. 88: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar