We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2014
On these annual ceremonial occasions it has been customary to have an Economist look at Economics, a Statistician discuss the role of Statistics, the Historian look at History, or all the Social Scientists look concertedly at some synthetic product called Social Science. There have been some exceptions to this type of procedure. I shall take my cue from the latter and discuss some matters in the Canadian scene in which the various Social Sciences have a common interest.
Canada's Population Possibilities. In the first place, let us consider Canada's population. In recent years we have heard much about the so-called over-populated and under-populated countries. The crudest form in which notions of this kind are presented is in terms of number of people per square mile of land surface. By this device Canada's 2½ per square mile seems to demonstrate obvious under-population as compared with England's 390, forgetting that this 390 involves resources not only at home but also abroad. We seem to be on safer ground when we take arable land surface as a base for presenting population densities. Then Canada seems not so vacant with 121 to the square mile. The arable land index should be supplemented by indices of available minerals and closely allied items. Such measuring rods could be extended to include (1) real income trends for the country as a whole as well as for its varied occupations, (2) the employment index, and (3) trends in population growth. These merely suggest some of the indices that could be used to make comparisons of population pressure on the living space of different countries.
1 Thompson, W. S., Population Problems (ed. 3, New York and London, 1942), p. 265.Google Scholar
2 Coats, R. H., “Statistics Comes of Age” (Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. II, 08, 1936, pp. 278 ff.).Google Scholar
3 Wright, F. Chalmers, Population and Peace (Paris, 1939), pp. 267–74.Google Scholar
4 Garfield Weston; carried by the Canadian Press and reported in the Montreal Star, May 5, 1943.
5 Canada, Dominion Bureau of Statistics, Canada Year Book, 1942, p. 16.
6 Hurd, W. B., “Population Movements in Canada, 1921-31” (Proceedings of the Canadian Political Science Association, vol. VI, 1934, pp. 222–4).Google Scholar
7 Dawson, C. A. and Younge, Eva R., Pioneering in the Prairie Provinces: The Social Side of the Settlement Process (Canadian Frontiers of Settlement Series, edited by Mackintosh, W. A. and Joerg, W. L. G., vol. VII, Toronto, 1940), chap. III.Google Scholar
8 Waines, W. J., Prairie Population Possibilities: A Study Prepared for the Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations (Ottawa, 1940), p. 601.Google Scholar
9 Hurd, W. B., “Some Implications of Prospective Population Changes in Canada” (Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. V, 11, 1939, p. 498 Google Scholar).
10 Report in the Montreal Star, May 15, 1943.
11 Eva R. Younge, “The European Immigrant in Canada” (in manuscript at McGill University).
12 Miner, Horace, St. Denis: A French-Canadian Parish (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1939).Google Scholar
13 Soon to be published by the University of Chicago Press.
14 Boas, Franz, The Mind of Primitive Man (New York, 1911).Google Scholar
15 Klineberg, Otto, Race Differences (New York, 1935).Google Scholar
16 Warner, W. L. and Lunt, P. S., The Social Life of a Modern Community (New Haven, 1941).Google Scholar
17 Leacock, Stephen, “A New Heaven and a New Earth” (Montreal Herald, 05 15, 1943).Google Scholar
18 Industrial Canada, vol. IV, 10 1903, p. 103.Google Scholar Quoted by Ś. Clark, Delbert “Canadian National Consciousness” (M.A. thesis, McGill University).Google Scholar
19 Clark, S. D., The Canadian Manufacturers' Association: A Study in Collective Bargaining and Political Pressure (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1939).Google Scholar
20 Innis, H. A., “The Rowell-Sirois Report” (Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. VI, 11, 1940, pp. 563 ff.).Google Scholar
