Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T09:27:09.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumer Rationing in Great Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

J. Henry Richardson*
Affiliation:
Leeds University
Get access

Extract

The problem reviewed in this article is restricted to organized compulsory systems for ensuring the regular distribution of specified quantities of commodities or groups of commodities to consumers. Systems of rationing goods to producers or traders or of determining priorities or allocations to them are not considered, even though they result in shortages to consumers. Nor is attention directed to voluntary schemes of rationing introduced to meet shortages by retailers who may decide to sell the commodities concerned only to their regular customers or to allow each customer only a small amount of the commodity. Voluntary methods may be adequate for dealing with shortages of less essential goods or with temporary shortages of necessaries, but are not effective for meeting continuing shortages of necessaries. Such systems are distinct from that of consumer rationing, and would require separate review, which in dealing with Great Britain would be concerned with Limitation of Supplies Orders by which traders receive only a fraction of their peace-time supplies, and with the consequences of such Orders.

Consumer rationing has its greatest value where supplies of necessaries are short and are yet available in sufficient quantity to give each consumer a reasonable amount if supplies are equitably distributed. Until rationing is introduced shortages result in rush to buy supplies so that the shortage is aggravated. Some purchasers who have time and money go round from shop to shop buying such quantities as they can obtain to build up a private stock, and thus deprive others of their fair share of the limited supply. Queues are formed outside the shops and much annoyance and uneasiness results. These and other difficulties are avoided when rationing is introduced, and the psychology of the public towards the shortage is improved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The main sources used in this article are: Board of Trade, Report of the Food (Defence Plans) Department for the year ended 31 December 1937; Ministry of Food, Rationing Order, Dated 27 December, 1939; Board of Trade, Explanatory Notes for Traders, Limitation of Supplies (Clothing and Apparal) Order, 1941, and the Consumer Rationing Order, 1941. See also SirBeveridge, William, British Food Control (London, 1928), for a survey of food control during the last war.Google Scholar

2 For further details of proposals for purchasing power rationing see Kalecki, M., “General Rationing” (Bulletin of the Institute of Statistics, Oxford, vol. III, 01 11, 1941)Google Scholar; also Economica, 08, 1941, article by Polak, J. J..Google Scholar

3 In the early period of rationing the coupons were cut out by the retailer and retained, but this was found inconvenient.

4 There are in addition four chief Divisional Food Officers in England and Wales and one in Scotland to deal with major supply problems and to maintain contact with the Military Commands.

6 Holders of stocks received permits authorizing them to continue deliveries in accordance with existing contracts, and to continue to sell normal quantities to their usual customers, until a full system of control was in operation.

7 See R. S. G., and Rutherford, M. E. E., “The Consumption and Rationing of Meat and Cheese” (Oxford Economic Papers, no. 5, 06, 1941).Google Scholar Reference to such data for Canada is made by MacGregor, D. C. in his account of “Studies of the Cost of Living in Canada” (Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. VII, 11, 1941).Google Scholar