No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Social Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2014
Extract
What I have to say will, I fear, be either obvious or presumptuous. However, what is obvious is worth looking at occasionally, and presumption is not a new phenomenon in university circles. I hope it may be agreed that the purpose of social studies is to acquire a better understanding of society in its widest sense, with a view to the formulation of policy, individual or collective. Dr. W. A. Mackintosh, in his presidential address to this Association, said that “any social science must ultimately be justified by the basis which it affords for policy,” and Father G.-H. Lévesque, “Les sciences sociales ont pour objet la connaissance de ce que sont et doivent être les sociétés.” What I suggest is obvious is that the intelligent formulation of policy almost invariably involves more than one and often several of the social studies.
All too frequently we find experts in particular studies, or in particular aspects of them, who might profit by a knowledge and understanding of what others are doing, becoming so absorbed in what they themselves are doing as to neglect, or dismiss as irrelevant, everything else. This Association is an excellent example of what can be achieved by co-operation, and attracts political scientists, economic theorists, economic historians, sociologists, anthropologists, and statisticians. In some countries, there are six separate associations, and I am sure something important is lost as a result. My own department at Toronto includes all of these except anthropologists, and adds commerce and finance as a branch of economics.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , November 1961 , pp. 437 - 443
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1961
References
1 “An Economist Looks at Economics,” this Journal, III, no. 3, 08, 1937, 316.Google Scholar
2 “Humanisme et sciences sociales,” this Journal, XVIII, no. 3, 08, 1952, 267.Google Scholar
3 “The Interlocking of Social and Economic Factors in Asian Development,” this Journal, XXV, no. 1, 02, 1959, 34–46.Google Scholar
4 Principles of Political Economy (London, 1920), xxviii.Google Scholar
5 Hart, C. W. M., ed., Essays in Sociology (Toronto, 1940), vii.Google Scholar
6 “Methods of Research–A Plea for Co-operation in the Social Sciences,” Economic Journal, 06, 1938, 184.Google Scholar
7 “The Teaching of Economics in Schools and Universities,” Economic Journal, 12, 1955, 587.Google Scholar
8 “On the Present State of Economic History,” this Journal, XXVI, no. 1, 02, 1960, 87–95.Google Scholar See also Hancock, W. K., Economic History at Oxford (Oxford, 1946).Google Scholar
9 “The Place of Economics and Allied Subjects in the Curriculum,” Economic Journal, 09, 1958, 448.Google Scholar
10 “Formation of Languages,” in The Theory of Moral Sentiments (London, 1767), 478.Google Scholar
11 “The Role of Intelligence in the Social Process,” this Journal, I, no. 1, 02, 1935, 64.Google Scholar
12 Ibid., 69.
13 “An Economist Looks at Economics,” this Journal, III, no. 3, 08, 1937, 317, n. 1Google Scholar,
14 Mavor, J., My Windows on the Street of the World (London, 1923), I, 172.Google Scholar
15 Luxury and Waste of Life (London, 1908), xiii.Google Scholar
16 MacIver, R. M., Society (New York, 1931), ix.Google Scholar
17 Utility and All That (London, 1952), 74.Google Scholar
18 Mill, , Principles, xxiv.Google Scholar
19 Urwick, , The Values of Life (Toronto, 1948), liii.Google Scholar
20 Introduction to Economics (London, 1960), 15.Google Scholar
21 Mishan, E. J., “A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939–59,” Economic Journal, 06, 1960, 256.Google Scholar
22 The Values of Life, 24, n. 19.
23 “The Theory of Moral Sentiments” in Black, J. and Hutton, J., Essays Philosophical and Literary (London, no date), 160.Google Scholar
24 Ibid., 135.