Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:50:36.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A case of neuroleptic malignant syndrome with aripiprazole and fluoxetine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2018

Tina Hu*
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Elise Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON
*
Correspondence to: Dr. Tina Hu, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 61 Queen Street East, 3rd Floor, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2; Email: tina.hu@mail.utoronto.ca

Abstract

Type
Clinical Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018 

CASE REPORT

A 24-year-old male with a history of schizophrenia presented to the emergency room in an agitated and confused state, with an acute onset of generalized muscular rigidity. He had recently been switched from olanzapine (20 mg orally/day) to long-acting aripiprazole (400 mg intramuscularly/month), with his second dose 3 weeks prior to the current admission, and was also taking fluoxetine (40 mg orally/day) for depression. On examination, he appeared diaphoretic and had an elevated blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. He was afebrile and tone was increased in the upper and lower limbs. Investigations showed leukocytosis (white blood cell count: 14.7 x 109/L), elevated creatinine (121 µmol/L), and elevated creatine kinase (initially 4,385 IU/L rising to 14,699 IU/L in 4 hours and 23,190 IU/L after another 6 hours). Other investigations were normal (i.e., electrolytes, thyroid stimulating hormone, toxicology screen, urinalysis, computed tomography scan of the brain, blood cultures, and troponins). His medications were held, and he was transferred to the intensive care unit under the suspicion of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS). Intravenous normal saline boluses, intravenous dantrolene (2.5 mg/kg), and lorazepam to manage agitation were administered. Creatine kinase levels gradually decreased and muscle rigidity improved. The patient was eventually transferred to the psychiatry inpatient team to manage the initiation of a new antipsychotic agent.

DISCUSSION

NMS is a life-threatening condition associated with antipsychotic use. It has a characteristic tetrad of altered mental status, muscle rigidity, hyperthermia, and autonomic instability (typically developing in that sequence).Reference Murri, Bugliani and Calcagno1, Reference Berman2 NMS is associated with a high mortality rate (10%-20%) due to the associated autonomic instability and systemic complications and requires early diagnosis and aggressive treatment.Reference Berman2

The pathogenesis of NMS is unknown, but it is believed to be related to dopamine receptor blockade. Central receptor blockade in the hypothalamus may lead to hyperthermia and autonomic instability, whereas blockade in the nigrostriatal pathways may lead to parkinsonian-type symptoms such as rigidity.Reference Chandran, Mikler and Keegan3 NMS risk is highest with the use of typical, high-potency antipsychotics such as haloperidol; however, reports have indicated that all types of antipsychotics (low potency and atypical) and antiemetic agents with dopaminergic blockade (domperidone and metoclopramide) have been associated with NMS.Reference Trollor, Chen, Chitty and Sachdev4 The time frame between antipsychotic use and onset of NMS is idiosyncratic.Reference Chandran, Mikler and Keegan3 Risk factors for NMS include prior history of NMS, high antipsychotic doses, parenteral administration, recent or rapid increases in dose, switching antipsychotics, dehydration, and concomitant use with lithium, anticholinergic medications, and antidepressants.Reference Berman2

Recent reviews have shown that aripiprazole, as used by our patient, leads to an “atypical” NMS phenotype compared with other atypical antipsychotics. Altered mental status and rigidity are universally present, and there is the possibility of more nausea and vomiting, lower peaks of creatine kinase, less hyperthermia and autonomic instability, and less severe and shorter NMS episodes.Reference Murri, Bugliani and Calcagno1 The differences in clinical presentation and laboratory findings may be due to aripiprazole’s mechanism of action. Instead of strong D2 blockade, aripiprazole is a partial agonist of D2/D3/D4 and 5-HT1A receptors.Reference Murri, Bugliani and Calcagno1 Antipsychotics with stronger D2 blockade, such as olanzapine and risperidone, have been shown to have a stronger association with NMS and higher severity of NMS episodes.Reference Murri, Bugliani and Calcagno1 Interestingly, our patient was concurrently taking fluoxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6. Aripiprazole is metabolized by CYP3A4/CYP2D6 isoenzymes, and co-administration with fluoxetine may have significantly increased plasma concentrations of aripiprazole. Consistent with the reported NMS phenotype associated with aripiprazole, our patient showed altered mental status and rigidity, signs of autonomic instability (i.e., diaphoresis, high blood pressure, and tachycardia), a lower peak of creatine kinase, no hyperthermia, and had a relatively shorter and less severe NMS episode.

There is no specific diagnostic test for NMS. In patients with possible NMS, a thorough history, examination, and laboratory findings such as elevated creatine kinase (greater than 1000 IU/L) can help confirm the clinical diagnosis.Reference Murri, Bugliani and Calcagno1 Table 1 shows the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for NMS; however, clinicians should note that NMS is heterogeneous in onset, presentation, and progression. Other nonspecific laboratory findings include leukocytosis with a left shift, electrolyte abnormalities, elevated liver function tests, elevated creatinine, and myoglobinuria from rhabdomyolysis.Reference Murri, Bugliani and Calcagno1 Investigations such as brain imaging and lumbar puncture are used to exclude other causes for altered mental status such as neurological disease and infection.Reference Murri, Bugliani and Calcagno1 Serotonin syndrome (associated with the use of serotonergic agents) is the most commonly diagnosed related disorder. However, a few notable differences include that, in serotonin syndrome, rigidity is less severe than in NMS, and there are several characteristics not seen in NMS, including hyperreflexia, shivering, myoclonus, ataxia, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea.

Table 1 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for neuroleptic malignant syndromeFootnote *

* Information from DSM-55

Treatment involves removing the causative agent and implementing supportive care to prevent complications, such as acute renal failure, acute respiratory failure, arrhythmias, disseminated intravascular coagulation, myocardial infarction, seizures, and sepsis.Reference Berman2 Frequent monitoring is needed, and intravenous fluids are required to maintain a euvolemic state. Cooling blankets can be used, and anti-hypertensive agents should be used to lower blood pressure if significantly elevated. Benzodiazepines should be used to control agitation as needed. Specific treatments for NMS are based on case reports, and their efficacy is unsupported with varying recommendations on treatment length.Reference Berman2 Dantrolene (1-2.5 mg/kg intravenously, up to 10 mg/kg/day), a direct-acting skeletal muscle relaxant, is often used in adults with NMS and has been reported to decrease rigidity and hyperthermia.Reference Chandran, Mikler and Keegan3 It is associated with a risk of hepatotoxicity when used at high doses.Reference Chandran, Mikler and Keegan3 Bromocriptine (D2 agonist; 2.5 mg through nasogastric tube every 6-8 hours, up to 40 mg/day) and amantadine (weak, noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist; 100 mg orally to a maximum of 200 mg every 12 hours) can also be used.Reference Chandran, Mikler and Keegan3

NMS often resolves within 2 days to 2 weeks. Risk factors for a prolonged course are depot antipsychotics and structural brain disease. Restarting antipsychotics carries the risk of a recurrent NMS episode. Risk factors for NMS recurrence include high potency antipsychotics, depot antipsychotics, and concomitant use of lithium. Guidelines for restarting antipsychotics to minimize recurrence risk of NMS include waiting at least 2 weeks prior to restarting antipsychotics, using lower potency agents, starting with low doses and titrating up gradually, avoiding dehydration/concomitant lithium, and monitoring for NMS signs.Reference Chandran, Mikler and Keegan3

Competing interests

None declared.

References

REFERENCES

1.Murri, MB, Bugliani, M, Calcagno, P, et al. Second-generation antipsychotics and neuroleptic malignant syndrome: systematic review and case report analysis. Drugs R D 2015;15:45-62.10.1007/s40268-014-0078-0Google Scholar
2.Berman, BD. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review for neurohospitalists. Neurohospitalist 2011;1:41-47.10.1177/1941875210386491Google Scholar
3.Chandran, GJ, Mikler, JR, Keegan, DL. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: case report and discussion. CMAJ 2003;169:439-442.Google Scholar
4.Trollor, JN, Chen, X, Chitty, K, Sachdev, PS. Comparison of neuroleptic malignant syndrome induced by first-and-second-generation antipsychotics. Br J Psychiatry 2012;201:52-56.10.1192/bjp.bp.111.105189Google Scholar
5.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for neuroleptic malignant syndrome*