Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:04:59.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P092: Combatting sedentary lifestyles; can exercise prescriptions in the emergency department lead to a behavioural change in patients?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

D. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Rothesay, NB
K. Leech-Porter
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Rothesay, NB
F. Milne
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Rothesay, NB
J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Rothesay, NB
S. Hull
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Rothesay, NB
P. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Rothesay, NB
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Patients with chronic diseases are known to benefit from exercise. Such patients often visit the emergency department (ED). There are few studies examining prescribing exercise in the ED. We wished to study if exercise prescription in the ED is feasible and effective. Methods: In this pilot prospective block randomized trial, patients in the control group received routine care, whereas the intervention group received a combined written and verbal prescription for moderate exercise (150 minutes/week). Both groups were followed up by phone at 2 months. The primary outcome was achieving 150 min of exercise per week. Secondary outcomes included change in exercise, and differences in reported median weekly exercise. Comparisons were made by Mann-Whitney and Fishers tests (GraphPad). Results: Follow-up was completed for 22 patients (11 Control; 11 Intervention). Baseline reported median (with IQR) weekly exercise was similar between groups; Control 0(0-0)min; Intervention 0(0-45)min. There was no difference between groups for the primary outcome of 150 min/week at 2 months (Control 3/11; Intervention 4/11, RR 1.33 (95%CI 0.38-4.6;p=1.0). There was a significant increase in median exercise from baseline in both groups, but no difference between the groups (Control 75(10-225)min; Intervention 120(52.5-150)min;NS). 3 control patients actually received exercise prescription as part of routine care. A post-hoc comparison of patients receiving intervention vs. no intervention, revealed an increase in patients meeting the primary target of 150min/week (No intervention 0/8; Intervention 7/14, RR 2.0 (95%CI 1.2-3.4);p=0.023). Conclusion: Recruitment was feasible, however our study was underpowered to quantify an estimated effect size. As a significant proportion of the control group received the intervention (as part of standard care), any potential measurable effect was diluted. The improvement seen in patients receiving intervention and the increase in reported exercise in both groups (possible Hawthorne effect) suggests that exercise prescription for ED patients may be beneficial.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018