Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:44:13.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Going Public”: Accessing Data, Contesting Information Blockades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

Justin Piché
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Memorial University, St John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada, jpiche@mun.ca, www.tpcp-canada.blogspot.com

Extract

Among prison scholars it is well known that access to penal institutions for the purposes of conducting research is not a given. For instance, in the Canadian context, some social researchers have been effectively barred from conducting studies inside prisons or have had to modify their research designs in order to enter the carceral. The ability to obtain unpublished records on imprisonment policies and practices in Canada has also been cited as a cumbersome process that often results in non-disclosure of the documents sought.

Beyond data collection, social researchers have also raised concerns about the challenges of communicating their findings to publics outside the academy. In criminology, in particular, scholars have been concerned with the perceived lack of influence academic work has had on public policy and public opinion. These interventions, while not novel, have resulted in calls for a public criminology, renewing a discussion on how to disseminate research to non-academic audiences.

Although much of the access to information literature is focused on the techniques used to obtain data as well as the barriers encountered during the process, and the public criminology literature is centred principally around the question of how to reach and influence those outside the halls of the university, few have examined how data collection and dissemination activities shape subsequent information flows. Here, I am not referring to the moments when and sites where the “policing of criminological knowledge” occur that mediate access to data sources and diffusion opportunities based on the epistemological orientations and political agendas of gatekeepers.

Type
Problems in Accessing Information: A Collection of Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yeager, Matthew, “Getting the Usual Treatment: Censorship and the Marginalization of Convict Criminology,” Contemporary Justice Review 11 (2008): 413–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Martel, Joane, “Policing Criminological Knowledge: The Hazards of Qualitative Research on Women in Prison,” Theoretical Criminology 8 (2004): 157–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Yeager, Matthew, “The Freedom of Information Act as a Methodological Tool: Suing the Government for Data,” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 48 (2006): 499521CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Chancer, Lynn and McLaughlin, Eugene, “Public Criminologies: Diverse Perspectives on Academia and Policy,” Theoretical Criminology 11 (2007): 155–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See Currie, Elliott, “Against Marginality: Arguments for a Public Criminology,” Theoretical Criminology 11 (2007): 175–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barak, Gregg, “Doing Newsmaking Criminology from Within the Academy,” Theoretical Criminology 11 (2007): 191205CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stanko, Betsy, “From Academia to Policy Making: Changing Police Responses to Violence Against Women,” Theoretical Criminology 11 (2007): 209–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See Martel, “Policing Criminological Knowledge.”

7 Foucault, Michel, The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York: Pantheon, 1972)Google Scholar.

8 For a more detailed account of my methodological framework consult Piché, Justin, “Accessing the State (of Imprisonment) in Canada: Information Barriers and Negotiation Strategies,” in Brokering Access: Power, Politics and Freedom of Information Process in Canada, ed. Larsen, Mike and Walby, Kevin (Vancouver: UBC Press, forthcoming 2012)Google Scholar.

9 Correctional Service of Canada [CSC], Physical Infrastructure (CSC, 2009), http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/qf/12-eng.shtmlGoogle Scholar (last accessed May 4, 2009). This page was pulled following an update to CSC's Web site in September 2009.

10 See Sampson, Rob, Gascon, Serge, Glen, Ian, Clarence, Chief Louie, and Rosenfeldt, Sharon, A Roadmap to Strengthening Public Safety: Report of the Correctional Service of Canada Review Panel (Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2007)Google Scholar.

11 See Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics [PRE], Tri-Council Policy Statement for Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, revised draft, 2nd ed. (Ottawa, 2009)Google Scholar.

12 Head, Don, “Modernization of Physical Infrastructure,” Let's Talk 33 (2008): 1315, http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/lt-en/2008/33-l/8-eng.shtml (last accessed January 10, 2009)Google Scholar.

13 See CSC, Physical Infrastructure.

14 Speakers for the event included Craig Jones (then executive director of the John Howard Society of Canada), Kim Pate (executive director of the Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies), and Tara Lyons (then executive director of the Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy). The panel was chaired by Eugene Oscapella (co-founder of the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy).

15 According to figures provided by provincial-territorial governments, as of February 17, 2010, there were 22 new prisons and nine expansions to existing facilities in the process of being established that will add 5,788 prisoner beds at a construction cost of $2.724 billion. It should be noted that these figures have been revised on several occasions as I prepared briefings and presentations for the May 2010 Bi-annual Meeting of the Provincial–Territorial Heads of Corrections, a March 2011 appearance before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, and an October 2011 appearance before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. As of October 2, 2011, there were 22 new prisons and 17 additions to existing facilities at the provincial–territorial level that will add more than 6,300 prisoner beds at a construction cost of approximately $3.4 billion.

16 As of October 2011, CSC has yet to issue a formal response to a research application I filed in April 2011.

17 Head, Don, “Changes to the Senior Ranks of CSC/Changements au niveau de la direction du SCC” (Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada [CSC], December 23, 2009)Google Scholar.

18 Tibbetts, Janice, “Ottawa to Up Prison Spending to Prep for Inmate Influx,” National Post (March 7, 2010), http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=2658875 (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar.

19 Power & Politics with Evan Solomon (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation [CBC], Ottawa, March 18, 2010), http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/ID=1444575999 (last accessed March 31, 2010)Google Scholar.

20 Currie, Bill, “Burgeoning Prison Budgets Spared the Axe,” Globe and Mail (March 29, 2010), http: //www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/burgeoning-prison-budgets-spared-the-axe/articlel515105/ (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar.

21 Power & Politics with Evan Solomon (CBC, Ottawa, March 31, 2010), http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/Politics/ID=1456872996 (last accessed March 31, 2010)Google Scholar.

22 May, Kathryn, “Few Can Put Price Tag on New Crime Bill,” Ottawa Citizen April 27, 2010, http://www.canada.com/news/price+crime+bill/2958248/story.html (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar.

23 See Tibbetts, Janice, “Tories' Planned Prison Legislation to Cost Billions,” Canwest News Service (April 28, 2010), http://www.globaltvbc.com/Tories+prison+legislation+will+cost+billions/2961526/story.html (last accessed August 14, 2010)Google Scholar.

24 Piché, Justin, “Prison Budget Showdown: Toews vs. Page, Provinces and Territories vs. the Feds,” Tracking the Politics of “Crime” and Punishment in Canada (April 29, 2010), http://tpcp-canada.blogspot.com/ (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar.

25 See Liberal Party of Canada, “Harper's Billion-Dollar Crime Agenda: More Out-of-Control Spending” (June 22, 2010), http://www.liberal.ca/newsroom/news-release/harper's-billion-dollar-crime-agenda-more-out-of-control-spending/ (last accessed August 4, 2010); New Democratic Party of Canada [NDP], “Government Lacks Transparency and Credibility Prison Costs: Davies” (June 22, 2010), http://www.ndp.ca/press/government-lacks-transparency-credibility-on-prison-costs-davies (last accessed August 4, 2010).

26 See May, Kathryn, “Watchdog, Critics Decry Lack of Financial Information from Tories,” Ottawa Citizen (May 9, 2010), http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Watchdogs+critics+decry+lack+nnancial+information+from+Tories/3006934/story.html (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar; “Sentencing Act to Cost Billions: Report,” CBC News (June 22, 2010), http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/06/22/truth-in-reconciliation-pbo-report.html (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar; “Budget Officer Sounds Fiscal Alarm on Tory Sentencing Law,” Globe and Mail (June 22, 2010), http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ budget-officer-sounds-fiscal-alarm-on-tory-sentencing-law/article1612988/ (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar; “Crime Bill Could Double Costs of Prisons: Watchdog,” CTV News (June 22, 2010), http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20100622/crime-costs-page-100622/s (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar; Smith, Joanna, “Federal Prison Bill to Cost a Billion Dollars a Year: Report,” Toronto Star (June 22, 2010), http://www.thestar.com/ news/canada/article/826778-tory-crime-bill-to-cost-extra-618m-per-year-report-finds (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar; Tibbetts, Janice, “Watchdog Pans Prison Spending Plan,” Canwest News Service (June 22, 2010), http://www.globalnews.ca/watchdog+pans+prison+spending+plan/78472/story.html (last accessed August 4, 2010)Google Scholar.

30 See CSC, Physical Infrastructure.

31 See Mathiesen, Thomas, Silently Silenced: Essays on the Creation and Acquiescence in Modern Society (Winchester: Waterside Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

32 See Martel, “Policing Criminological Knowledge.”

33 See Yeager, “Getting the Usual Treatment”; Yeager, “Freedom of Information Act.”