Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T08:18:20.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speaking/Listening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Hester Lessard
Hester Lessard
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes critiques/Review Essays
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Printemps/spring 1992 , pp. 163 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. M.A. Fineman and N.S. Thomadsen, eds. (New York and London: Routledge, 1991); hereinafter Boundaries.

2. Williams, P., “On Being the Object of Property’ in Boundaries at 22–25Google Scholar.

3. Lahey, K., “Reasonable Women and the Law” in Boundaries at 3–4Google Scholar.

4. West, R., “The Difference in Women's Hedonic Lives: A Phenomenological Critique of Feminist Legal Theory” in Boundaries at 115–123Google Scholar.

5. Much of the experiential basis for West's claims has been edited out of the Boundaries version of the essay. The more extended version can be found at (1987) 3 Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 81Google Scholar.

6. Ibid.

7. Colker, R., “Feminism, Sexuality and Authenticity” in Boundaries at 135–38Google Scholar.

8. White, L., “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.” in Boundaries at 40–56Google Scholar.

9. 397 U.S. 254 (1970).

10. hooks, b., Talking Back (Toronto: Between the Lines, 1988) at 14Google Scholar.

11. I do not exempt myself from this preoccupation. See Lessard, H., “Relationship, Particularity, and Change: Reflections on R. v. Morgentaler and Feminist Approaches to Liberty” (1991) 36 McGill Law Journal at 263Google Scholar.The essays in Boundaries have helped me place the work of developing feminist reconceptions of basic political constructs in a more strategic context See discussion of D. Majury, infra.

12. Majury, D., “Strategizing in Equality” in Boundaries at 320–30Google Scholar.

12. Smart, C., Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.