Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T16:15:47.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Prepositions and Case-Marking in French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Laurie Zaring
Laurie Zaring*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One proposal which has played and continues to play an important role in the syntactic analysis of Romance prepositional phrases is that not everything which looks like a preposition is in fact a true preposition. First proposed by Vergnaud (1974) for French, the idea is that some apparent Ps actually act as simple Case-marking on an NP; in Vergnaud’s case, this was the à associated with Goal arguments. As a result, the syntactic representation of Goal arguments involves no PP-node, but rather an NP with an inflectional Case-marking à. Vergnaud’s proposal was developed further for French à by Kayne (1975) and Jaeggli (1981), and is assumed to be valid for French de by Elliott (1986). Chomsky (1986) also suggests that English of is in many cases the realization of genitive Case, and Demonte (1989) argues that many instances of Spanish a or de phrases selected for by verbs are not PPs but rather NPs marked with Case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 363 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo 1990 Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comorovski, Ileana 1990 Verb Movement and Object Extraction in French. Pp. 91–105 in Proceeding of NELS XX. Carter, Julie, Dechaine, Rose-Marie, Philip, Bill and Sherer, Tim, eds. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Graduate Linguistics Students Association.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter 1991 Topicalization, Inversion, and Complementizers in English. Ms.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta 1989 Linking, Case and the Case of Prepositional Verbs. Ms.Google Scholar
Elliott, W. Neil 1986 On the Derivation of en-Clitics. Pp. 97–121 in The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Borer, Hagit, ed. Orlando: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane 1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeannette 1974 The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo 1981 Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo 1986 Case, Doubled NPs, and Extraction. Pp. 15–42 in The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Borer, Hagit, ed. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard 1975 French Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard 1989 Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement. Pp. 85–103 in Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar. Benincà, Paola, ed. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, Godehard 1983 The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach. Pp. 302–323 in Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Bauerle, Rainer, Schwarze, Christoph and Stechow, Armin von, eds. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru 1990 Case Realization and Scrambling. Ms.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara 1986 Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles. Pp. 115–143 in Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Groenendijk, Jeroen, Jongh, Dick de and Stokhof, Martin, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Yves and Vinet, Marie-Thérèse 1989 La variation dialectale en grammaire universelle. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael 1989 Topic Islands and the Subjacency Parameter. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34:145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Hilary 1989 French Indirect Object Cliticization and the Thematic Role Hierarchy. Pp. 229–239 in ESCOL ’89: Proceedings of the Sixth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Jong, Kim de and No, Yong Kyoon, eds. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger 1974 French Relative Clauses. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie and Karttunen, Lauri 1984 Morphological Non-Distinctiveness and Coordination. Pp. 309–320 in ESCOL ‘84: Proceedings of the First Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Alvarez, Gloria, Brodie, Belinda, McCoy, Terry, eds. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Zaring, Laurie 1992a French Ce as a Clausal Determiner. Probus. [In press.]Google Scholar
Zaring, Laurie 1992b On a Type of Argument Island in French. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. [In press.]Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne 1984 Orphan Prepositions in French and the Concept of ‘Null Pronoun’. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar