Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:40:43.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of temporal expansion of speech on aphasic comprehension1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Mary Lois Marckworth
Mary Lois Marckworth*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Language events occur in a temporal domain. Every speech event occupies a span of time and has temporal boundaries beyond which it cannot be reduced (or, presumably, expanded) and remain intelligible. Normal language users operate successfully within these temporal boundaries, both producing and perceiving utterances within the critical limits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , Spring 1976 , pp. 79 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The kind help of the following individuals and institutions where the testing reported in this study was carried out is most gratefully acknowledged: Dr. Russell Malone and the Glenrose Provincial Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta; Dr. J. L. Shapley and Dr. George L. Larsen and the Veterans Administration Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Dr. R. Bollinger, University Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. The comments of Drs. G. D. Prideaux, J. T. Hogan, and Wm. J. Baker of the Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta, on an earlier version of this paper were most helpful, and are acknowledged with thanks; in particular, Dr. Baker’s advice on the statistical analysis of the data is greatly appreciated.

References

Boller, F. 1968 Latent aphasia: right and left ‘non-aphasic’ brain-damaged patients compared. Cortex 4.245–56.Google Scholar
Boller, F. & Vignolo, L. A. 1966 Latent sensory aphasia in hemisphere-damaged patients: an experimental study with the Token Test. Brain 89.815–30.Google Scholar
Bond, Z. S. 1974 On the specification of input units in speech perception. Paper presented at Bell Laboratories Symposium, New Jersey, March 1974.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Robert L. & Rutherford, David R. 1973 Acoustic cue discrimination in adult aphasia. J, Sp. Hear. Res. 16.534–44.Google ScholarPubMed
De Renzi, E. & Vignolo, L. A. 1962 The Token Test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasia. Brain 85.665–78.Google Scholar
Ebbin, J. B. & Edwards, A. E. 1967 Speech sound discrimination of aphasics when intersound interval is varied. J. Sp. Hear. Res. 10.120–5.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. E. & Auger, R. 1965 The effect of aphasia on the perception of precedence. Proc. Am. Psychol. Assoc, pp. 207–8.Google Scholar
Efron, R. 1963 Temporal perception, aphasia and deja vu. Brain 86.403–24.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. D. & Campbell, R. A. 1965 Temporal discrimination in aphasoid and normal children. J. Sp. Hear. Res. 8.313–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Noll, J. D. & Berry, W. R. 1969 Some thoughts on the Token Test. J. Ind. Sp. Hear. Assoc. 27.37–40.Google Scholar
Orgass, B. & Poeck, K. 1966 Clinical validation of a new test for aphasia: an experimental study of the Token Test. Cortex 2.222–43.Google Scholar
Poeck, K., Kerschensteiner, M. & Hartje, W. 1972 A quantitative study on language understanding in fluent and non-fluent aphasia. Cortex 8.299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasanuma, S., Tatsumi, I. F., Kiritani, S. & Fujisaki, H. 1973 Auditory perception of signal duration in aphasic patients. Res. Inst. for Logopedics and Phoniatrics, University of Tokyo, Faculty of Medicine, Ann. Bull. 7.65–72.Google Scholar
Schuell, H., Jenkins, J. J. & Jimenez-Pabon, E. 1964 Aphasia in adults. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Sheehan, J. G., Aseltine, S. & Edwards, A. E. 1973 Aphasic comprehension of time spacing. 7. Sp. Hear. Res. 16.650–7.Google Scholar
Spreen, O. & Benton, A. L. 1969 Neurosensory Centre Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia: NCCEA, rev. ed. Victoria B.C.: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Swisher, L. P. & Sarno, M. T. 1969 Token Test scores of three matched patient groups: left braindamaged with aphasia; right brain-damaged without aphasia; nonbrain-damaged. Cortex 5.264–73.Google Scholar
Walker, C. & Black, J. W. 1950 The intrinsic intensity of oral phrases. Joint Project Report #2 U.S. School of Aviation Medicine, Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Fla.Google Scholar