Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:40:17.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The perfect in Oscan and Umbrian1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Jack St. John
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A long-standing problem in the reconstruction of proto-Italic has been the wide discrepancy between the Oscan/Umbrian and Latin perfectum markers. Latin for the most part employs either -s- or -u-/-v- throughout its perfect system, e.g. serp-s-it ‘he crawled’ (cf. pres. serp-it), al-u-it ‘he nourished’ (cf. pres. al-it), amā-v-it ‘he loved’ (cf. pres. ama-t). On the other hand, Osean and Umbrian have apparently created a number of new perfect formations: an f-perfect, shared by both (O. aíkda-f-ed ‘he decreed’, U. ateřa-f-ust ‘he will have made the circuit’); a -tt-formative found only in Osean (dadíka-tt-ed ‘he dedicated’) and in a few of the Minor Dialects; the -l- and *-nky- types, both peculiar to Umbrian (ape-l-ust ‘he will have offered up’, purdi-nsi-ust ‘he will have offered’).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Spring 1973 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I should like to thank Professor N. E. Collinge of the University of Toronto for making valuable comments on an earlier draft of this article. Any errors that remain are, of course, mine.

References

Bader, F. 1967 Le système des désinences de troisième personne du pluriel du perfectum latin. BSL 62.62–87 (1967).Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile 1935 Origines de la formation des noms en indo-européen. Vol. 1. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve, 1935.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling 1904 A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. Boston: Ginn, 1904.Google Scholar
Burger, A. 1926 Le parfait latin en -vï et le problème des formes “contractes.” Revue des études latines 4.4–115, 212–17 (1926).Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine 1933 Esquisse d’une histoire de la langue latine. Paris: Hachette, 1933 3.Google Scholar
Olzscha, K. 1958 Das umbrische Perfekt auf nki , Glotta 36.36–300 (1958).Google Scholar
Olzscha, K. 1963a Literaturbericht iiber italische Sprachen 1939-1962. Glotta 41.41–70.Google Scholar
Olzscha, K. 1963b Das f-Perfectum im Oskisch-Umbrischen. Glotta 41.41–290 (1963).Google Scholar
Poultney, James Wilson 1959 The Bronze Tables of Iguvium. Baltimore: American Philological Association, 1959. (Philological Monographs, 18).Google Scholar
Safarewicz, Jan 1969 Historische lateinische Grammatik. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1969.Google Scholar
St. John, Jack 1971 The u-Perfect in Italic. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard, 1971.Google Scholar
Specht, P. 1935 Zur Geschichte der Verbalklasse auf -ē . KZ 62.62–29 (1935).Google Scholar
Vetter, Emil 1957 ire und fuisse. Gedenkschrift Paul Kretschmer, edited by Kronasser, Heinz, Band 2, pp. 194–198.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert 1969 Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. Heidelberg: Winter, 1969. (= Kurylowicz, Jerzy (editor), Indogermanische Grammatik, Band 3: Formenlehre, Erster Teil).Google Scholar