Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T01:11:24.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Convolution Estimates and Generalized de Leeuw Theorems for Multipliers of Weak Type (1,1)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Nakhlé Asmar
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Missouri- Columbia Columbia, Missouri 65211 U.S.A.
Earl Berkson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois Department of Mathematics1409 West Green Street Urbana, Illinois 61801 U.S.A.
T. A. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of EdinburghJames Clerk Maxwell Building Edinburgh EH9 3JZ Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the context of a locally compact abelian group, we establish maximal theorem counterparts for weak type (1,1) multipliers of the classical de Leeuw theorems for individual strong multipliers. Special methods are developed to handle the weak type (1,1) estimates involved since standard linearization methods such as Lorentz space duality do not apply to this case. In particular, our central result is a maximal theorem for convolutions with weak type (1,1) multipliers which opens avenues of approximation. These results complete a recent series of papers by the authors which extend the de Leeuw theorems to a full range of strong type and weak type maximal multiplier estimates in the abstract setting.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1995

References

1. Asmar, N., Berkson, E. and Bourgain, J., Restrictions from ℝn to ℤn of weak type (1,1) multipliers, Studia Math. 108(1994), 291299.Google Scholar
2. Asmar, N., Berkson, E. and Gillespie, T.A., Transference of strong type maximal inequalities by separationpreserving representations, Amer. J. Math. 113(1991), 4774.Google Scholar
3. Asmar, N., Berkson, E. and Gillespie, T.A., Distributional control and generalized analyticity, Integral Equations and Operator Theory 14(1991), 311341.Google Scholar
4. Asmar, N., Berkson, E. and Gillespie, T.A., Maximal estimates on measure spaces for weak type mutlipliers, J. Geom. Anal., to appear.Google Scholar
5. Asmar, N., Berkson, E. and Gillespie, T.A., Maximal estimates on groups, subgroups, and the Bohr compactification, J. Funct. Anal., to appear.Google Scholar
6. Berkson, E., Gillespie, T.A. and R Muhly, S., LP-multiplier transference induced by representations in Hilbert space, Studia Math. 94(1989), 5161.Google Scholar
7. de Leeuw, K., On Lp multipliers, Ann. of Math. 81(1965), 364379.Google Scholar
8. Dowson, H.R., Spectral Theory of Linear Operators, London Math. Soc. Monographs 12, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
9. Edwards, R.E. and Gaudry, G.I., Littlewood-Paley and Multiplier Theory, Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. 90, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
10. Hewitt, E. and Ross, K.A., Abstract Harmonic Analysis I, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 115, Academic Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
11. Hewitt, E., Abstract Harmonic Analysis II, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 152, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.Google Scholar
12. Saeki, S., Translation invariant operators on groups, Tôhoku Math. J. 22(1970), 409419.Google Scholar
13. Sawyer, S., Maximal inequalities of weak type, Ann. of Math. 84(1966), 157174.Google Scholar
14. Stein, E.M., On limits of sequences of operators, Ann. of Math. 74(1961), 140170.Google Scholar
15. Zygmund, A., Trigonometric Series, 2nd edition, vol. I, Cambridge University Press, 1959.Google Scholar