Article contents
On q-Carleson Measures for Spaces of M-Harmonic Functions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In this paper we study the q-Carleson measures for a space of M-harmonic potentials in the unit ball of Cn, when q < p. We obtain some computable sufficient conditions, and study the relations among them.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1997
References
[Ad]
Adams, D.R., Lectures on Lp-potential theory. Umea Univ. Reports
2(1981), 417–451.Google Scholar
[AhCo]
Ahern, P. and Cohn, W., Exceptional sets for Hardy-Sobolev functions, p > 1, Indiana Univ. Math. J.
38(1989), 417–451.+1,+Indiana+Univ.+Math.+J.+38(1989),+417–451.>Google Scholar
[AhNa]
Ahern, P. and Nagel, A., Strong Lp-estimates for maximal functions with respect to singular measures with applications to exceptional sets. Duke Math. J.
53(1986), 359–393.Google Scholar
[Ca]
Carleson, L., Interpolation by bounded analytic functions and the corona theorem. Ann. of Math.
76(1962), 547–559.Google Scholar
[CaOr1]
Cascante, C. and Ortega, J.M., Carleson measures on spaces of Hardy-Sobolev type. Canad. Math. J.
47(1995), 1177–1200.Google Scholar
[CaOr2]
Cascante, C., Tangential-exceptional sets for Hardy-Sobolev spaces. Illinois J. Math.
39(1995), 68–85.Google Scholar
[CoVe1]
Cohn, W.S. and Verbistky, I.E., On the trace inequalities for Hardy-Sobolev functions in the unit ball of Cn. Indiana Univ. Math. J.
43(1994), 1079–1097.Google Scholar
[CoVe2]
Cohn, W.S., Non-linear potential theory on the ball, with applications to exceptional and boundary interpolation sets. Michigan Math. J.
42(1995), 79–97.Google Scholar
[CoMeSt]
Coifmann, R.R., Meyer, Y. and Stein, E.M., Some new function spaces and their applications to harmonic analysis. J. Funct. Anal.
62(1985), 304–335.Google Scholar
[HeWo]
Hedberg, L.I. and Wolff, Th. H., Thin sets in nonlinear potential theory. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)
33(1983), 161–187.Google Scholar
[Lu1]
Luecking, D.H., Embedding derivatives of Hardy spaces into Lebesgue spaces. Proc. LondonMath. Soc.
3(1991), 595–619..Google Scholar
[Lu2]
Luecking, D.H., Representation and duality in weighted spaces of analytic functions. Indiana Univ. Math. J.
34(1985), 319–336.Google Scholar
[MaKh]
Maz’ya, V. G. and Khavin, V.P., Non-linear potential theory. RussianMath. Surveys
27(1972), 71–148.Google Scholar
[MaNe]
Maz’ya, V. G. and Y.Netrusov, Some counterexamples for the theory of Sobolev spaces on bad domains. Potential Analysis
4(1995), 47–65.Google Scholar
[NaRuSh]
Nagel, A., Rudin, W. and Shapiro, J.H., Tangential boundary behavior of functions in Dirichlet-type spaces. Ann. of Math.
116(1982), 331–360.Google Scholar
[St]
Stegenga, D.A., Multipliers of the Dirichlet space. Illinois J. Math.
24(1980), 113–139.Google Scholar
[Su]
Sueiro, J., Tangential boundary limits and exceptional sets for holomorphic functions in Dirichlet-type spaces. Math. Ann.
286(1990), 661–678.Google Scholar
[Ve]
Verbitsky, I.E., Weighted norm inequalities for maximal operators and Pisier's theorem on factorization. through Lp∞, Integral Equations Operator Theory
15(1992), 124–153.Google Scholar
[Yo]
Yoo, Y.J., Area integral associated with singular measures on the unit sphere on Cn. Rocky Mountain J. Math.
25(1995), 815–825.Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 3
- Cited by