Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T10:25:24.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weighted Fourier Transform Inequalities via Mixed Norm Hausdorff-Young Inequalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Joseph D. Lakey*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712 U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Wiener-Lorentz amalgam spaces are introduced and some of their interpolation theoretic properties are discussed. We prove Hausdorff-Young theorems for these spaces unifying and extending Hunt's Hausdorff-Young theorem for Lorentz spaces and Holland's theorem for amalgam spaces. As consequences we prove weighted norm inequalities for the Fourier transform and show how these inequalities fit into a natural class of weighted Fourier transform estimates

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1994

References

[AH] Aguilera, N. and Harboure, E., In search of weighted norm inequalities for the Fourier transform, Pacific J. Math. 104(1983), 114.Google Scholar
[B] Benedetto, J., Uncertainty principle inequalities and spectrum estimation. In: Fourier Analysis and Applications, NATO-ASI Series C 315, (eds Byrnes, J.), Kluwer Publisher, The Netherlands, 1990, 143182.Google Scholar
[BH] Benedetto, J. and Heinig, H., Weighted Hardy spaces and the Laplace transform, Lecture Notes in Math. 992, Springer-Verlag, 1983, 240277.Google Scholar
[BHJ] Benedetto, J., Heinig, H. and Johnson, R., Weighted Hardy spaces and the Laplace transform II, Math. Nachr. 132(1987), 2955.Google Scholar
[BL] Benedetto, J. and Lakey, J., The definition of the Fourier transform for weighted norm inequalities, J. Funct. Anal., to appear.Google Scholar
[BD] Bertrandias, J.-P. and Dupuis, C., Transformation de Fourier sur les espaces F ﹛IP ), Ann. Inst. Fourier 29(1979), 189206.Google Scholar
[BJS] Bloom, S., Jurkat, W. B. and Sampson, G., Two weighted (LP ,Lq) estimates for the Fourier transform, preprint.Google Scholar
[BB] Butzer, P. L. and Berens, H., Semi-groups of Operators and Approximation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin- Heidelberg-New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[CD] Chang, Y. and Davis, K., Lectures on Bochner-Riesz Means, London Math Soc. Lecture Notes Series 114, Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
[Fl] Feichtinger, H., Generalized amalgams, with applications to the Fourier transform, preprint.Google Scholar
[F2] Feichtinger, H., Banach spaces of distributions of Wiener's type and interpolation. In: Functional Analysis and Approximation, (eds. P. Butzer, B. Sz. Nagy, and E. Gôrlich), ISNM 69, Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel-Boston- Stuttgart, 1981,153-165.Google Scholar
[FI] Flett, T. M., On a theorem of Pitt, Bull. London Math. Soc. (2) 7(1973), 376384.Google Scholar
[Fo] Fournier, J. J. F., On the Hausdorjf-Young theorem for amalgams, Monatsh. Math. 95(1983), 117135.Google Scholar
[FS] Fournier, J. J. F. and J. Stewart, Amalgams of If andlq, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 13(1985), 121.Google Scholar
[H] Heinig, H., Weighted norm inequalities for classes of operators, Indiana Univ. Math. J. (4) 33(1984), 573583.Google Scholar
[Hi] Hirschman, I.I. Jr., Multiplier transformations II, Duke Math. J. 28(1961), 4556.Google Scholar
[Ho] Holland, F., Harmonic analysis on amalgams of LP and lq, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 10(1975), 295305.Google Scholar
[Hu] Hunt, R. A., On L(p, q) spaces, L'Enseign. Math. 12(1966), 249275.Google Scholar
[J] Johnson, R., Recent results on weighted inequalities for the Fourier transform. In: Seminar Analysis of the Karl-WeierstraB-Institute 1986/87,Teubner-texte zurMath., bd. 106, (eds. Schulze, B., Triebel, H.), Teubner, Leipzig, 1988, 287296.Google Scholar
[JS1] Jurkat, W. and Sampson, G., On rearrangement and weight inequalities for the Fourier transform, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 33(1984), 257270.Google Scholar
[JS2] Jurkat, W. and Sampson, G., On maximal rearrangement inequalities for the Fourier transform, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (2) 282(1984), 625643.Google Scholar
[K] Kenig, C., Restriction theorems, Carleman estimates, uniform Sobolev inequalities and unique continuation. In: Harmonic Analysis and Partial Differential Equations, Proceedings of Conf. at El Escorial, Lecture Notes in Math 1384, (ed. Garcia Cuerva, J.), Springer-Verlag, 1989, 6990.Google Scholar
[KS] Kerman, R. and Sawyer, E., Weighted norm inequalities for potentials with applications to Schrodinger operators, Fourier transforms, and Carleson measures, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1985), 12112116.Google Scholar
[LI] Lakey, J., Trace inequalities, maximal inequalities, and weighted Fourier transform estimates, submitted.Google Scholar
[L2] Lakey, J., Weighted norm inequalities for the Fourier transform, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, 1991.Google Scholar
[Ml] Muckenhoupt, B., A note on two weight function conditions for a Fourier transform norm inequality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (1) 88(1983), 97100.Google Scholar
[M2] Muckenhoupt, B., Weighted norm inequalities for the Fourier transform, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (1983), 276729-742.Google Scholar
[R] Rooney, P. G., GeneralizedHp-spaces and the Laplace transform. In: Proc. Conf. Oberwolfach, Birkhauser, Basel, 1968, 146156.Google Scholar
[S] Sagher, Y., Real interpolation with weights, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30(1981), 113121.Google Scholar
[St] Stein, E., Interpolation of linear operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 83(1956), 482492.Google Scholar
[SW] Stein, E. and Weiss, G., Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces, Princeton U. Press, Princeton, N. J., 1971.Google Scholar
[T] Titchmarsh, E., Introduction to the Theory of Fourier Integrals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1962.Google Scholar
[Tr] Triebel, H., Interpolation Theory, Function Spaces, Differential Operators, North-Holland, Amsterdam- New York-Oxford, 1978.Google Scholar
[W] Wiener, N., Tauberian theorems, Ann. of Math 33(1932), 1100.Google Scholar