Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T18:52:30.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chronic Stimulation of the Left Vagus Nerve: Cognitive Motor Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Early studies of cognitive motor control have shown deficits in complex reaction time tests of epileptic subjects. The purpose of this efficacy study was to determine whether chronic (28 months) stimulation of the left vagus nerve (VNS) to control seizures increased these deficits in 6 epileptic subjects with intractable complex partial seizures.

Methods:

Subjects were assessed for simple reaction time, Test A, and subsequent Tests B and C which involved more complex cognitive strategies. Tests were done pre-operatively (S1) and at intervals, 6-8 weeks (S2-S3), and at 6 month intervals (S4-S6) over a 28 month period. Data were collected and collated on an Apple II E computer (Apple, Cupertino CA. U.S.A.) and on electronic switch pad. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance technique with 2 within subject factors, day, and time of day.

Results:

2/11 cognitive measures showed a statistically significant difference. Error rate associated with Test A (simple reaction time) significantly decreased for the factor of day (repeated visits) p = .01. For Test C, error rates decreased in the afternoon (p = .03). This test involved the subjects ability to respond quickly to one signal while simultaneously ignoring a second signal. Data analysis of the covariate showed that the effects of VNS are weak in comparison to baseline differences and the frequency of nerve stimulation negatively predicts the number of wrong errors. High frequency stimulation results showed fewer errors than low frequency stimulation T = -2.31, p = .03.

Conclusion:

Chronic stimulation of the left vagus nerve to control seizure activity does not impair cognitive motor control.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 226 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1997

References

REFERENCES

1.Anonymous. A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures. The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Neurology 1995; 45(2): 224–230.Google Scholar
2.Ben-Menachem, E, Manon-Espaillat, R, Ristanovic, R, et al. First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 1. A controlled study of effect on seizures. Epilepsia 1994; 35(3): 616–626.Google Scholar
3.George, R, Salinsky, M, Kuzniecky, R, et al. First International Vagus Stimulation Study Group. Epilepsia 1994; 35(3) 637–643.Google Scholar
4.Holder, LK, Wernicke, JF, Tarver, WB. Treatment of refractory partial seizures: preliminary results of a controlled study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992; 15: 1557–1571.Google Scholar
5.Landy, HJ, Ramsay, RE, Slater, J, Casiano, RR, Morgan, R. Vagus nerve stimulation for complex partial seizures: surgical technique. J Neurosurg 1993; 79(4): 636–637.Google Scholar
6.Michael, JE, Wegener, K, Barnes, DW. Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable seizures: one year follow-up. J Neurosci Nurs 1993; 35(6): 362–366.Google Scholar
7.Neufeld, M, Quaknine, G, Korczy, n. Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures. Harefuah 1995; 129(1-2): 5–7.Google Scholar
8.Ramsay, RE, Uthman, BM, Augustinsson, LE, et al. The First International Vagus Stimulation Study Group. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 2. Safety, side effects and tolerability. Epilepsia 1995; 35(3): 627–636.Google Scholar
9.Uthman, BM, Wilder, BJ, Penry, JK, et al. Treatment of epilepsy by stimulation of the vagus nerve. Neurology 1993; 43: 1338–1345.Google Scholar
10.Alpherts, WC, Aldenkamp, P. Results of reaction time measurement in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 1994; (Suppl. 7): 35 Abstract.Google Scholar
11.Willem, CJ, Alpherts & Albert, P, Aldenkamp, P. Results of reaction time measurement in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 1994; (Suppl. 7) 35: 52.Google Scholar
12.Upton, ARM, Cooper, IS, Springham, M, Amin, I. Suppression of seizures and psychosis of limbic system origin by chronic stimulation of anterior nucleus of thalamus. XII Int Symposium of the Fulton Society. “Brain Mechanisms of Emotion”. Int J Neurol 1985; (19-20): 223–230.Google Scholar
13.Clarke, BM, Upton, A, Griffin, H, Hudoba, P. Balance and cognitive impairment in two epileptic patients before and after vagal nerve stimulation. Pace 1991; 14(1): 77–85.Google Scholar
14.Clarke, BM, Upton, ARM, Griffin, H, Hudoba, P. Acute effects of high frequency vagal nerve stimulation on balance and cognitive motor performance in epilepsy: three case study reports. Pace 1992; 15(10): 1608–1613.Google Scholar
15.Donders, FC. On the speed of mental processes. In: Hoster, WG, ed. and translator. Attention and Performance II. Acta Psychol 1969; 30: 412–431.Google Scholar
16.Posner, MI, Nissen, MJ, Ogden, WC . Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of spatial location. In: Pick, HL, Saltzman, IJ, eds. Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1978.Google Scholar
17.Aldenkamp, AP, Alpherts, WCJ, Blennow, G, et al. Withdrawal of antiepileptic medication in children-effects on cognitive function: the Multicenter Holmfrid Study. Neurology 1993; 43(1): 41–49.Google Scholar
18.Van Rijckevorsel-Harmant, K, Flahaut, D, Harman, J, de Barsy, T. Event-related potentials and cognitive function in epileptic patients. Clin Electroencephalogr 1990; 2: 67–73.Google Scholar
19.Meador, KJ, Loring, DW, Moore, EE, et al. Comparative cognitive effects of phenobarbital phenytoin and valproate in healthy adults. Neurology 1995; 45: 1494–1499.Google Scholar
20.Pulliainen, V, Jokelainen, M. Comparing the cognitive effects of phenytoin and carbamazepine in long-term monotherapy: a two-year follow-up. Epilepsia 1995; 36: 12: 1195–1202.Google Scholar