Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:57:11.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypertension and Stroke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2018

J. David Spence*
Affiliation:
London, ON
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 2002

References

1. Spence, JD. Cerebral consequences of hypertension. In: Laragh, JH, Brenner, B, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 741-753.Google Scholar
2. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991;265:3255-3264.Google Scholar
3. Forette, F, Seux, M-L, Staessen, J, Thij, L, et al. Prevention of dementia in the Syst-Eur trial. Lancet 1998;352:1347-1351.Google Scholar
4. Spence, JD. Antihypertensive drugs and prevention of atherosclerotic stroke. Stroke 1986;17:808-810.Google Scholar
5. Barnett, HJ, Taylor, DW, Eliasziw, M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998 339(20):1415-1425.Google Scholar
6. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Lancet 2001;358:1033-1041.Google Scholar
7. Spence, JD, Del Maestro, RF. Hypertension in acute ischemic strokes: Treat. Arch Neurol 1985;42:1000-1002.Google Scholar
8. Tietjen, CS, Hurn, PD, Ulatowski, JA, Kirsch, JR. Treatment modalities for hypertensive patients with intracranial pathology: options and risks. Crit Care Med 1996;24:311-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kanji, S, Corman, C, Douen, AG. Blood pressure management in acute stroke: comparison of current guidelines with prescribing patterns. Can J Neurol Sci 2002;2:125-131.Google Scholar
10. Spence, JD, Zarnke, KB. Stroke and Hypertension. In: Oparil, S, Weber, MA, eds. Hypertension: A Companion to Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 2000:266-286.Google Scholar
11. Spence, JD, Paulson, OB, Strandgaard, S. Hypertension and Stroke. In: Messerli, FH, ed. The ABCs of Antihypertensive Therapy. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000:279-296.Google Scholar
12. Schrader, J, Röthemeyer, M, Lüders, S, Kollmann, K. Hypertension and stroke -rationale behind the ACCESS trial. Basic Res Cardiol 1998;93(Suppl 2):69-78.Google Scholar
13. Schrader, J, Lüders, S, Kulchewski, A, et al. [Acute Candesartan Cilexitil Evaluation in Stroke Survivors: a double-blind randomised comparison of candesartan cilexitil and placebo in the control of blood pressure after an acute stroke.] Hochdruck und Nierenkrankheit 2002; (abstract) in pressGoogle Scholar
14. Spence, JD. Stepped Care for Hypertension is dead but what will replace it? CMAJ 1989;140:1133-1136.Google Scholar
15. Spence, JD. Management of resistant hypertension in patients with carotid stenosis: high prevalence of renovascular hypertension. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10:249-254.Google Scholar
16. Spence, JD. Physiologic tailoring of therapy for resistant hypertension: 20 years experience with stimulated renin profiling. Am J Hypertens 1999;12:1077-1083.Google Scholar
17. Eastwood, JD, Provenzale, JM, Hurwitz, LM, Lee, TY. Practical injection-rate CT perfusion imaging: deconvolution-derived hemodynamics in a case of stroke. Neuroradiology 2001; 43(3):223-226.Google Scholar
18. Nabavi, DG, Cenic, A, Craen, RA, et al. CT assessment of cerebral perfusion: experimental validation and initial clinical experience. Radiology 1999;213(1):141-149.Google Scholar
19. Bath, P, Boysen, G, Donnan, G, et al. Hypertension in acute stroke: what to do? Stroke 2001; 32(7):1697-1698.Google Scholar