Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T10:19:57.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carving Content at the Joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Stephen Yablo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Here is Frege in Foundations of Arithmetic, §64:

The judgment ‘Line a is parallel to line b', in symbols: a | | b, can be taken as an identity. If we do this, we obtain the concept of direction, and say: ‘The direction of line a is equal to the direction of line b.’ Thus we replace the symbol | | by the more generic symbol =, through removing what is specific in the content of the former and dividing it between a and b. We carve up the content in a way different from the original way, and this yields us a new concept. (Frege 1997, 110-11)

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 34: Truth and Values - Essays for Hans Herzberger , 2008 , pp. 145 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burge, T. 1984. ‘Frege on extensions of concepts, from 1884 to 1903.’ Philosophical Review 93: 3–34.Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1992. ‘Frege on knowing the third realm.’ Mind 101: 633-50.Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1998. ‘Frege on knowing the foundation.’ Mind 107: 305-47.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1979. ‘The inscrutability of reference.’ Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10: 7–19.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2006. ‘Neo-Fregean ontology.’ Philosophical Perspectives 20(1): 95–121.Google Scholar
Field, H. 1994. ‘Deflationist views of meaning and content.’ Mind 103: 249-85.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1997. The Frege Reader. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hale, B. 1988. Abstract Objects. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hale, B. 1997. ‘Grundlagen §64.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97: 24∼1.Google Scholar
Hale, B. 2001. ‘A response to Potter and Smiley: Abstraction by recarving.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101: 339-58.Google Scholar
Heck, R. G. Jr 2000. ‘Syntactic reductionism.’ Philosophia Mathematica 8(2): 124-49.Google Scholar
Levine, J. 1996. ‘Logic and truth in Frege: II.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. vol. 70: 141-75.Google Scholar
Lewis, D., and R., Langton. 2001. ‘Redefining “intrinsic”.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63(2): 381-98.Google Scholar
Potter, M., and T., Smiley. 2001. ‘Abstraction by recarving.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101: 327-38.Google Scholar
Potter, M., and T., Smiley. 2002. ‘Recarving content: Hale's final proposal.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102: 351-54.Google Scholar