Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, Patricia Smith. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, Paul M., and Churchland, Patricia Smith. 1983. “Stalking the Wild Epistemic Engine,” Noûs 17, 5-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crook, Seth, and Gillett, Carl. 2001. “Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the ‘Physical': Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of Physicalism,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31.3, 333-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1990. “Representation and Interpretation.” In Modeling the Mind, Mohyeldin, K. A. Said, Newton-Smith, W. H., and Wilkes, K. V., eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 13-26.Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel. 1988. “Quining Qualia.” In Consciousness in Modern Science, Marcel, A. and Bisiach, E., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, reprinted in Mind and Cognition: A Reader, William Lycan, ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 519-47.Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel. 1993. “Back from the Drawing Board.” In Dennett and his Critics,Bo Dahlbom, ed. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 203-35.Google Scholar

Dretske, Fred. 1995. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry. 1980. “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology,” In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. (1981) Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225-53.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry. 1987. PsychosemanticsL The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, Jerry. 1994. The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and its Semantics. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kim, Jaegwon. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melnyk, Andrew. 1997. “How to Keep the ‘Physical’ in Physicalism,” Journal of Philosophy 94, 622-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1989. “In Defense of Proper Functions,” Philosophy of Science 56,288-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, Paul, and Putnam, Hilary. 1958. “The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, Feigl, Herbert, Scriven, Michael, and Maxwell, Grover, eds., pp. 3-36.Google Scholar

Poland, Jeffrey. 1994. Physicalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized,” In his Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, John. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. 1984. The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sterelny, Kim. 1990. The Representational Theory of Mind. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stich, Steven. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tye, Michael. 1992. “Naturalism and the Mental,” Mind 101,421-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wegner, Daniel M., and Wheatley, Thalia P.. 1999. “Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Illusion of Conscious Will,” presented at ASSC3 (the third annual conference of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness), June, London, Ontario.Google Scholar

Weiskrantz, Lawrence. 1997. Consciousness Lost and Found: A Neuropsychological Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar