Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 1974
James Collins writes that some modern philosophers have not been given revisionary treatment by their critics.
This is the case with Wolff, Bentham, and Comte, who are held fast in their respective categories of rationalism and utilitarianism and positivism, with only minor flurries of research aimed at reconsidering them from a fresh angle.
Fortunately, Bentham's day has now come, and we have in David Lyons’ In the Interest of the Governed, a major new interpretation. Lyons permits us to continue to call Bentham a “utilitarian,” but we have to revise what we understand by the term in this context.
1 Interpreting Modern Philosophy (Princeton, N. J. : Princeton University Press, 1972), pp. 252–253.
2 In the Interest of the Governed (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), p. 25.
3 Ibid., pp. 31–34.
4 Ibid., pp. 36–37.
5 Ibid., p. 64.
6 Ibid., pp. 64–69.
7 Ibid., p. 54.
