Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:24:12.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Impact of Political Scandals on Attitudes toward Democracy: Evidence from Canada's Sponsorship Scandal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2016

Nick Ruderman  and
Neil Nevitte
Nick Ruderman*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Neil Nevitte*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Rm. 3018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S3G3nick.ruderman@utoronto.ca
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Rm. 3018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S3G3n.nevitte@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Satisfaction with the workings of democracy seems to have declined in Canada, as it has in other established democracies. Political scandals are one frequently invoked explanation for that shift. But there is substantial scholarly disagreement about whether political scandals undermine democratic satisfaction. This paper uses evidence from a conveniently timed round of the CES (Canadian Election Study) from 2004, as well as the CES panel from 2004 and 2006, to explore this relationship more definitively than is usually possible. The results indicate that the scandal eroded satisfaction with the way democracy works but did not undermine support for democracy more generally.

Résumé

La satisfaction envers le fonctionnement de la démocratie semble avoir diminué au Canada similairement à ce qu'on observe dans d'autres démocraties établies. Les scandales politiques sont souvent une explication invoquée pour justifier cette situation. Mais il existe un désaccord scientifique substantiel quant à savoir si les scandales politiques sont la cause directe d'une baisse de la satisfaction démocratique. Ce document utilise des questions de l'ÉÉC (Étude électorale canadienne), posées à un moment opportun en 2004, ainsi que la section panel de l'ÉÉC de 2004 à 2006, afin d'explorer directement la relation entre satisfaction démocratique et scandales. Les résultats indiquent que le scandale a effectivement érodé la satisfaction envers le fonctionnement de la démocratie, mais n'a pas semblé affecter le soutien pour les principes démocratiques de base.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 885 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto and Wacziarg, Romain. 2000. “The Economics of Civic Trust.” In Disaffected Democracies, ed. Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul D. 2009. Fixed effects regression models. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher and Guillory, Christine. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91: 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Cameron. 2010. “Economic Voting in Canada: Assessing the Effects of Subjective Perceptions and Electoral Context.” In Voting Behaviour in Canada, ed. Anderson, Cameron and Stephenson, Laura. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Michael and Fulton, Murray. 2013. “Understanding Public Sector Ethics: Beyond Agency Theory in Canada's Sponsorship Scandal.” International Public Management Journal 16: 386–412.Google Scholar
Bastedo, Heather, Chu, Wayne and Hilderman, Jane. 2011. “Occupiers and Legislators: A Snapshot of Political Media Coverage.” Samara Democracy Reports. http://www.samaracanada.com/docs/default-document-library/sam_occupiersandlegislators.pdf (July 19 2015).Google Scholar
Blais, André and Gélineau, Francois. 2007. “Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Studies 55: 425–41.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna, Fournier, Patrick, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nevitte, Neil. 2005. “The Political Psychology of Voters’ Reactions to a Corruption Scandal.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Fournier, Patrick, Nevitte, Neil, Everitt, Joanna and Kim, Jiyoon. 2010. “Political Judgments, Perceptions of Facts, and Partisan Effects.” Electoral Studies 29: 1–12.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun and Karp, Jeffrey. 2004. “Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government.” Political Behavior 26: 271–87.Google Scholar
Chanley, Virginia A., Rudolph, Thomas J. and Rahn, Wendy M.. 2000. “The origins and consequences of public trust in government: a time series analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 239–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, William. 2010. Auditing Canadian Democracy. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Kornberg, Alan and Scotto, Thomas. 2009. Making Political Choices. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fallows, James. 1996. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine Democracy. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Free, Clinton and Radcliffe, Vaughn. 2009. “Accountability in Crisis: The Sponsorship Scandal and the Office of the Comptroller General in Canada.” Journal of Business Ethics 84: 189–208.Google Scholar
Garrett, James B. and Benjamin, Wallace. 1976. “Cognitive Consistency, repression-sensitization, and level of moral judgement: reactions of college students to the Watergate Scandal” Journal of Social Psychology 98: 69–76.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth and Bastedo, Heather, eds. 2014. Canadian Democracy from the Ground Up: Perceptions and Performance. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Everitt, Joanna, Blais, André, Fournier, Patrick and Nevitte, Neil. 2013. “Explaining the modern gender gap.” In Mind the Gap: Canadian Perspectives on Gender and Politics, ed. Lexier, Roberta and Small, Tamara. Halifax NS: Fernwood Press.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nevitte, Neil, Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna and Fournier, Patrick. 2012. Dominance and Decline: Making Sense of Recent Canadian Elections. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar and Porter, Dawn. 2009. Basic Econometrics. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc 2005. Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. “Postmaterial Values and the Erosion of Institutional Authority.” In Why People Don't Trust Government, ed. Nye, Joseph, Zelikow, Philip and King, David. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael. 1996. “The Search for Definitions: The Vitality of Politics and the Issue of Corruption.” International Social Science Journal 149: 321–35.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. 1986. “Sex, Money, and Power.” In Politics in Britain and the United States: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Hodder-Williams, and Caesar, . Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kornberg, Allan and Clarke, Harold D.. 1992. Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kozolanka, Kirsten. 2006. “The Sponsorship Scandal as Communication: The Rise of Political and Strategic Communications in the Federal Government” Canadian Journal of Communications 31: 343–366.Google Scholar
Kumlin, Staffan and Esaiasson, Peter. 2012. “Scandal Fatigue? Scandal Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe, 1977–2007.” British Journal of Political Science 42: 263–82.Google Scholar
Lang, Kurt and Lang, Gladys. 1966. “The Mass Media and Voting.” In Reader in Public Opinion and Communication, ed. Barelson, Bernard and Janowitz, Morris. 2nd ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence and Pammett, Jon. 2014. “Attitudes toward Democratic Norms and Practices: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” In Canadian Democracy from the Ground Up: Performance and Perceptions, ed. Gidengil, Elisabeth and Bastedo, Heather. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Lenard, Patti Tamara and Simeon, Richard. 2012. “Introduction” in Imperfect Democracies: The Democratic Deficit in Canada and the United States, ed. Lenard, Patti Tamara and Simeon, Richard. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219.Google Scholar
Maier, Jurgen. 2011. “The Impact of Political Scandals on Political Support: An Experimental Test of Two Theories.” International Political Science Review 32: 283–302.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Maureen, Atkinson, Michael M., Blais, André, Greene, Ian and Nevitte, Neil. 1998, 2006. A Question of Ethics: Canadians Speak Out. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Ruth. 2008. The Erotics of Corruption: Law, Scandal and Political Perversion. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur and Borelli, Stephen. 1991. “Confidence in Government during the 1980s.” American Politics Quarterly 19: 147–73.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard. 2002. “Satisfaction with Democracy: The Canadian Paradox.” In Value Change and Governance, ed. Nevitte, Neil. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard and Giasson, Thierry. 2005. “Canada's Democratic Malaise: Are the Media to Blame?” In Strengthening Canadian Democracy, ed. Howe, Paul, Johnston, Richard and Blais, André. Montreal: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in Cross-national Perspective. Peterborough ON: Broadview.Google Scholar
Nevitte, Neil ed. 2002. Value Change and Governance in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Nevitte, Neil and White, Stephen. 2012. “Citizen Expectations and Democratic Performance: The Sources and Consequences of Democratic Deficits from the Bottom Up.” In Imperfect Democracies: The Democratic Deficit in Canada and the United States, ed. Tamara, Patti Lenard, and Simeon, Richard. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, Walgrave, Stefaan and Van Aelst, Peter. 2006. “Does Protest Signify Disaffection? Demonstrators in a Postindustrial Democracy.” In Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics, ed. Torcal, Mariano and Montero, José Ramón. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S., Zelikow, Philip and King, David C., eds. 1997. Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda and Gidengil, Elisabeth, eds. 2006. Gender and Social Capital. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Pétry, François. 2014. “A Tale of Two Perspectives: Election Promises and Government Actions in Canada.” In Canadian Democracy from the Ground Up: Perceptions and Performance, ed. Gidengil, Elisabeth and Bastedo, Heather. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Pharr, Susan J. 2000. “Officials’ Misconduct and Public Distrust: Japan and the Trilateral Democracies.” In Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? ed. Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert, eds. 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Ridley, F.F. and Doig, Alan. 1995. Sleaze: Politicians, Private Interests and Public Reactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 2000. “Interdependence and Democratic Legitimation.” In Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, ed. Pharr, Susan and Putnam, Robert. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sigel, Roberta S. and Hoskin, Marilyn Brookes. 1977. “Affect for government and its relation to policy output among adolescents.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 111–34.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Neuman, W.R., Citrin, Jack, McClosky, Herbert and Shanks, J.M.. 1975. “Stability of Support for the Political System: The Initial Impact of Watergate.” American Politics Quarterly 3: 437–57.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 2000. Political Scandals: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar