Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:06:34.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internal Trade Agreements in Canada: Progress, Complexity and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Christopher J. Kukucha*
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
*
Department of Political Science, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K 3M4, email: christopher.kukucha@uleth.ca

Abstract

Despite criticism of ongoing protectionism, this study argues that Canada's internal trade regime has evolved significantly since the implementation of the original Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT). This includes thirteen formal amendments to the AIT and numerous regional agreements in Western, Central, and Atlantic Canada. Borrowing from the liberal International Political Economy (IPE) literature it argues that existing regional agreements complement and offer a potential framework for broader internal trade reforms at the national level. Of these the New West Partnership Trade Agreement (NWPTA) offers a promising model for Canada's internal market, with revised rules and norms related to negative lists, labour mobility, procurement, and investment and dispute settlement. Ongoing efforts to remove barriers will also be linked to a strengthened Internal Trade Secretariat, confidence-building measures, increased transparency and further reform of technical language.

Résumé

Malgré les critiques sur les mesures de protectionnisme en cours, cette étude fait valoir que le régime de commerce intérieur du Canada a considérablement évolué depuis la mise en œuvre de l’Accord initial sur le commerce intérieur (ACI). Cela comprend les treize modifications formelles à l’ACI et de nombreux accords régionaux dans l’Ouest canadien, le centre du Canada et le Canada atlantique. En se basant sur la documentation libérale de l’Économie politique internationale (EPI), il préconise que les accords régionaux existants complètent et offrent un cadre potentiel pour des réformes globales du commerce interne sur le plan national. Parmi ceux-ci, l’Accord sur le commerce, l’investissement et la mobilité de la main-d’œuvre (ACIMMO) propose un modèle prometteur pour le marché intérieur du Canada, avec des règles et normes révisées relatives aux listes négatives, la mobilité de la main-d’œuvre, l’approvisionnement et les investissements et le règlement des différends. Les efforts en cours pour éliminer les obstacles seront également liés à un renforcement du Secrétariat du commerce intérieur, des mesures de renforcement de la confiance, une transparence accrue et d’autres réformes du langage technique.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agreement on Internal Trade, 2014. Labour Mobility Coordinating Group. http://www.ait-aci.ca/index_en/labour.htm (August 22, 2014).Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2008. Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Douglas. 2002. Market Rules: Economic Union Reform and Intergovernmental Policy-Making in Australia and Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Steven. 2014. “Industry Minister Says Trade Barriers Between Provinces a ‘Perfect Storm of Dumb’.” Vancouver Sun, September 5. http://www.vancouversun.com/story_print.html?id=10179300&sponsor= (September 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Cohn, Theodore H. 2010. Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice. 5th ed. Longman: New York.Google Scholar
Doern, G. Bruce and MacDonald, Mark. 1999. Free-Trade Federalism: Negotiating the Canadian Agreement on Internal Trade. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. 2014. One Canada One National Economy: Modernizing Internal Trade in Canada. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Hinarejos, Alicia. 2012. “Free Movement, Federalism and Institutional Choice: A Canada EU Comparison.” Cambridge Law Journal, 71: 537–66.Google Scholar
Knox, Robert and Karabegović, Amela. 2009. “Canada's Problem with Interprovincial Trade Barriers.” Fraser Forum (July/August): 225.Google Scholar
McGrane, David. 2013. “National Unity through Disengagement: The Harper Government's One-Off Federalism.” In How Ottawa Spends 2013–2014: The Harper Government—Mid-Term Blues and Long Term Plans, ed. Stoney, Christopher and Bruce Doern, G.. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
MARCAN. 2014. Marketplace Canada: Your Gateway to Canadian Procurement Processes. www.marcan.net (April 15, 2014).Google Scholar
New West Partnership Trade Agreement. 2014. Regulated Occupations in Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia. http://www.newwestpartnershiptrade.ca/pdf/SK_AB_BC%20regulated%20occupations.pdf (July 15, 2014).Google Scholar
Public Policy Forum. 2013. Canada's Evolving Internal Market: An Agenda for a More Cohesive Economic Union. Ottawa: Public Policy Forum.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John. 2011. “Regional Trade Agreements.” In Global Political Economy. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shrybman, Steven. 2009. State of Play: Canada's Internal Free Trade Agenda. Toronto: Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP Lawyers.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Canada. Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Richardson, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 157, at para 63.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Canada. Murphy v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co., [1958] S.C.R. 626 at 642.Google Scholar