Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T21:23:57.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Position and Interest Recognition: The Voter in Broadview, or Are Voters Fools?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

J. Paul Grayson
J. Paul Grayson
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a brief footnote in Political Man, S.M. Lipset argued that political scientists had, in the past, approached the phenomenon of electoral change in terms of its being “a rational reaction to new situations or factors.” Sociologists and social psychologists who had channelled their endeavours in this directtion, on the other hand, had, Lipset argued, placed emphasis elsewhere: when it came to explanations of the vote, group pressures and the fulfilment of personal needs were first in their repertoire.

Type
Notes
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 131 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (Garden City, 1963), 294.

2 Campbell, A., The American Voter (New York, 1960), 121.Google Scholar

3 “Voters and Elections: Past and Present,” in Political Opinion and Electoral Behaviour, ed. Dreyer, E.C. (Belmont, 1970), 469.Google Scholar

4 “Attitude Organization and Voting Behaviour in Canada,” The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 8 (1971), 165.

5 The Responsible Electorate (Cambridge, 1966), 7.

6 L. McDonald, “Attitude Organization,” 165.

7 Crysdale, S., Occupational and Social Mobility in Riverdale, A Blue Collar Community (PHD thesis, University of Toronto, 1968), 15.Google Scholar

8 Meisel, John, “Religious Affiliation and Electoral Behaviour,” in Voting in Canada, ed. Courtney, J. (Scarborough, Ont., 1967), 150.Google Scholar Also see Anderson, G., “Voting Behaviour and the Ethnic-Religious Variable: A Study of a Federal Election in Hamilton,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 32 (1966), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Gagne, W. and Regenstreif, P., “Some Aspects of New Democratic Party Urban Support in 1965,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 33 (1967), 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Also see Wilson, J., “Politics and Social Class in Canada: The Case of Waterloo South,” this JOURNAL, I (1968), 296.Google Scholar

10 Laponce, J.A., People vs Politics (Toronto, 1969Google Scholar). Also see Gagne and Regenstreif, “NDP Urban Support,” 530.

11 G. Anderson, “Voting Behaviour,” 33.

12 Meisel, John, Working Papers on Canadian Politics (Montreal, 1972), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Scarrow, H.D., “Three Dimensions of a Local Party,” in Papers on the 1962 Election, ed. Meisel, J. (Toronto, 1965), 64.Google Scholar Also see J. Wilson, “Politics,” 297.

14 Alford, R., Party and Society (Chicago, 1963Google Scholar).

15 Gaigne and Regenstreif, “NDP Urban Support,” 537. Also see Jewett, Pauline, “Voting in the 1960 Federal Bi-Elections at Peter-borough and Niagara Falls: Who Voted New Party and Why?,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 28 (1962), 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Wilson, “Politics,” 302. Also see, Gagne and Regenstreif, “NDP Urban Support,” 536.