Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:30:57.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Editorial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Publication, especially publication in refereed journals, is the major indicator of research accomplishment. The author of a journal article receives, and deserves, credit within the status systems of scholarship. Despite the importance of authorship in the assignment of professional rewards (recognition, professional advancement, etc.), or perhaps because of it, guidelines concerning authorship are not terribly clear. In the case of papers with multiple authors, either the inclusion of some names or the order of authorship may be a matter of considerable debate and concern. I am convinced that errors of omission and commission are common. The problem is one of ethics but not alone of ethics. It is also a problem of the security or quality control over the processes of scientific and other scholarly writing.

Type
Editorial/Éditorial
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1986