Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T21:21:48.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Human Longevity: Distinctive Mechanisms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

S. Pfeiffer
S. Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The maximum lifespan (MLS) of Homo sapiens is substantially greater than that of our closest relatives, the non-human primates. Since evolutionary divergence from a common primate ancestor occurred relatively recently, the genetic changes affecting MLS must have occurred quickly. The evolution of MLS is generally explainable as a pleiotropic effect of genetic material that speeds or postpones cellular damage. However, in humans it can be argued that direct selection for longevity is plausible: through mechanisms of personal fitness among males and inclusive fitness among females. A flaw to such an explanatory approach is that it is non-falsifiable.

Résumé

La durée de vie maximale (MLS [Maximum Life Span]) de l'homo sapiens est considérablement plus longue que celle de nos plus proches parents, notamment les primates non-humains. Puisque le mouvement évolutionniste depuis le primate commun ancestral est survenu relativement récemment, les changements génétiques agissant sur le MLS ont done dû également survenir rapidement. L'évolution du MLS s'explique généralement par un effet pleiotropique de substance génétique qui accélère ou renvoie à plus tard toute détérioration cellulaire. Cependant, chez les humains, la notion qu'il pourrait exister une sélection directe visant la longévité semble plausible: chez les hommes, par des mécanismes de santé physique personnelle et chez les femmes, une santé physique équilibrée. Le seul défaut évident retrouvé dans cette ligne de raisonnement est qu'elle est non-falsifiable.

Keywords

AgingEvolutionHuman LongevityMaximum LifespanInclusive Fitness
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Summer/Été 1990 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albin, R.L. 1988 The pleiotropic gene theory of senescence: supportive evidence from human genetic disease. Ethology and Sociobiology 9: 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, D.P. 1986 The hare and the tortoise: Culture, biology and human nature. Penguin Group, N.Y.Google Scholar
Beverton, R.J.H. 1987 Longevity in fish: some ecological and evolutionary considerations, pp. 161–185 in Evolution of Longevity in Animals, Woodhead, A.D., Thompson, K.H., eds., Plenum Press, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocquet-Appel, J.P. and Masset, C. 1982 Farewell to paleodemography. J. Hum. Evol. 11: 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brash, D.E. and Hart, R.W. 1978 Molecular Biology of Aging, pp. 57–82 in The Biology of Aging, Behnke, J.A., Finch, C.E., Moment, G.B., eds., Plenum Press, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, M. 1978 Endurance of Life: The Implications of Genetics for Human Life Cambridge U. Press, London.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N.A. 1988 Life histories, blood revenge and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239: 985–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comfort, A. 1979 The Biology of Senescence, Third Ed.Elsevier, N.Y.Google Scholar
Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. 1980 Functional age: a conceptual and empirical critique, pp. 23–50 in Second Conference on the Epidemiology of Aging, Haynes, S.G. and Feinleib, M., eds., U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Cunningham, W.R. and Brookbank, J.W. 1988 Gerontology: the Psychology, Biology and Sociology of Aging Harper & Row, N.Y.Google Scholar
Cutler, R.G. 1978 Evolutionary biology of senescence, pp. 311–360, in The Biology of Aging, Behnke, J.A., Finch, C.E., Moment, G.B., eds., Plenum Press N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, R.G. 1985 Dysdifferentiative hypothesis of aging: a review, pp. 307–340 in Molecular Biology of Aging: Gene Stability and Gene Expression, Sohal, R.S., et al., eds., Raven Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Deevey, E.S. 1960 The human population. Scientific American 203: 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, H.E. 1989 Evolution of human serial pairbonding. Am. J. Phys. Anth. 78: 3: 331–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gompertz, B. 1825 On the nature of the function expressive of the law of humanb mortality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1: 513–585.Google Scholar
Gosden, R.G. 1985 Biology of Menopause: the Causes and Consequences of Ovarian Ageing Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hames, R. 1984 On the definition and measure of inclusive fitness and the evolution of menopause. Human Ecology 12: 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayflick, L. 1985 Theories of biological aging. Experimental Gerontology 20: 145–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayflick, L. 1988 Why do we live so long? Geriatrics 43: 10: 77–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Holden, C. 1987 Why do women live longer than men? Science 238: 158–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, N. 1982 Village composition implied by a paleodemographic life table: the Libben site. Am. J. Phys. Anth. 59: 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M.J. 1977 Biology of Ageing Blackie Pub., Glasgow.Google Scholar
Lewin, R. 1989 Human Evolution: an illustrated introduction, Second Ed.Blackwell Sci. Pub., Boston.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C. 1979 Sociobiology as an adaptationist program. Behavioral Science 24: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovejoy, C.O., R.S., Meindl, Mensforth, R.P. and Barton, T.J. 1985 Multifactorial determination of skeletal age at death: a method and blind tests of its accuracy. Am. J. Phys. Anth. 68: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, P.J. 1981 Evolution of the menopause: theoretical considerations and empirical conclusions. Am. J. Phys. Anth. 54: 250.Google Scholar
Mayer, P.J. 1982 Evolutionary advantage of the menopause. Human Ecology 10: 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, S.C. 1980 Aging and Old Age Scott, Foresman & Co., Glenview, Ill.Google Scholar
Medawar, P.B. 1952 An Unsolved Problem of Biology H.K. Lewis, London.Google Scholar
Miyadi, D. 1967 Differences in social behavior among Japanese macaque troops, in Neue Ergebnisse der Primatologie.Google Scholar
Neel, J.V. 1970 Lessons from a “primitive” people. Science 170: 3960: 815–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeiffer, S. 1985 Comparison of adult age estimation techniques, using an ossuary sample. Can. Rev. of Phys. Anth./Can. J. Anth. 4: 13–18.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R. 1959 The Logic of Scientific Discovery Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Rose, M. and Charlesworth, B. 1980 A test of evolutionary theories of senescence. Nature 287: 141–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowell, T.E. 1969 Long-term changes in a population of Ugandan baboons. Folia Primat. 11: 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacher, G.A. 1978 Longevity, aging and death: an evolutionary perspective. Geron-tologist 18: 112–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suchey, J.M. 1979 Problems in the aging of females using the os pubis. Am. J. Phys. Anth. 51: 467–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Templeton, A.R., Sing, C.F., Kessling, A. and Humphries, S. 1988. A cladistic analysis of phenotype associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. II. The analysis of natural populations. Genetics 120: 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobias, P.V. 1983 Hominid evolution in Africa. Can. J. Anth. 3: 2: 163–186.Google Scholar
Walker, P.L., Johnson, J.R. and Lambert, P.M. 1988 Age and sex biases in the preservation of human skeletal remains. Am. J. Phys. Anth. 76: 183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, H.R., Butler, R.N., Sprott, R.L. and Schneider, E.L. eds. 1987 Modern Biological Theories of Aging Raven Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Washburn, S.L. 1981 Longevity in primates, pp. 11–30 in Aging: Biology and Behavior, McGaugh, J.L., Kiesler, S.B., eds., Academic Press, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B.J. 1987 Rates of evolution: is there a conflict between neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory and the fossil record? Am. J. Phys. Anth. 73: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.C. 1957 Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11: 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.C. 1966 Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Williams, G.C. and Taylor, P.D. 1987 Demographic consequences of natural selection, pp. 235–245 in Evolution of Longevity in Animals, Woodhead, A.D., Thompson, K.H., eds., Plenum Press, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1975 Sociobiology, the New Synthesis Harvard Press, p. 101.Google Scholar