Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T12:12:49.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting There: Mapping the Gendered Geography of Caregiving to Elderly Relatives*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Bonnie C. Hallman  and
Alun E. Joseph
Bonnie C. Hallman
Affiliation:
California State University at Chico
Alun E. Joseph
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper extends an earlier analysis of the geography of caregiving to elderly relatives (Joseph & Hallman, 1996), by closely examining the implications of time-distance between family caregivers and their older relatives. We hypothesize that overlaying a highly gendered social behaviour (eldercare) onto the distinctive time-space geographies of men and women will translate into demonstrably different “eldercare geographies”. Analysis of data from two interrelated CARNET surveys suggests that female and male caregivers provide assistance within very different time-space contexts. Women demonstrate greater engagement with caregiving and more extensive commitments to travel in order to provide assistance. This “distance-defying” behaviour translates into the use of residential relocation as a means of modifying time-space in order to improve caregiving provision. In contrast, male caregivers are more sensitive to the limiting effects of time-distance, including the manipulation of their eldercare geographies. The paper concludes with a discussion, based on comments made by caregivers, of the negative impacts of eldercare involvement, focussing on perceived effects on personal time for other family relationships.

Résumé

Cet article poursuit une analyse déjà effectuée sur les soins aux membres âgés de la famille (Joseph & Hallman, 1996), en examinant de plus près les incidences de temps et de distance entre ceux qui soignent et les personnes âgées qui reçoivent les soins. Nous posons l'hypothèse qu'une étude plus approfondie d'un comportement social fortement axé sur le sexe (soins aux personnes âgées) et d'un fonctionnement distinct sur le plan du temps et de l'espace fera ressortir des comportements éminemment différents entre les hommes et les femmes. L'analyse des données provenant de deux enquêtes connexes du Réseau canadien de recherche sur le vieillissement laisse entendre que les soignants, hommes ou femmes, fournissent une assistance dans des contextes d'espace-temps différents. Les femmes font preuve d'un engagement plus grand lorsqu'elles dispensent des soins et voyagent afin de fournir une assistance. Elles adoptent un comportement défiant la distance qui se traduit par le recours au déménagement pour modifier l'espace-temps et améliorer les soins. À l'opposé, les hommes qui dispensent des soins sont plus sensibles aux limites imposées par l'espace-temps et auront moins souvent recours au déplacement des aîné(e)s soigné(e)s. Cet article se termine par une discussion, inspirée de commentaires de soignants, et portant sur les effets négatifs de l'engagement auprès de personnes âgées, surtout sur les effets perçus du temps pour les autres relations familiales.

Keywords

Geography of CaregivingTime-DistanceGenderEldercareFamily Relationships.Géographie de la prestation des soinstemps et distancegenresoins aux personnes âgéesrelations familiales.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , Hiver/Winter 1999 , pp. 397 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, E.K. (1989). Family care of the frail elderly: framing an agenda for change. Women's Studies Quarterly, 1–2, 75–86Google Scholar
Abel, E.K., & Nelson, M.K. (1990). Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Brody, E. (1990). Women in the middle: Their parent-care years. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Chappell, N. (1988). Long-term care in Canada. In E. Rathbone-McCuan & Havens, B. (Eds.), North American elders: United States and Canadian perspectives (pp. 89–108). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, N. (1991). Living arrangements and sources of caregiving. Journals of Gerontology, 46, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, K. (1996). Families and time: Keeping pace in a hurried culture. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, K. (1994). The tensions between process time and clock time in care work: the example of day nurseries. Time and Society, 3, 276–303.Google Scholar
Duffy, A., Mandeli, N., & Pupo, N. (1989). Few choices: Women, work and family. Toronto: Garamond Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, I. (1990). Space, time and renegotiating motherhood: an exploration of the domestic workplace. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8, 459–483.Google Scholar
Finley, N.J. (1989). Theories of family labour as applied to gender differences in caregiving for elderly parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Googins, B.K. (1991). Work/family conflicts: Private lives -public responses. New York: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, B.H., Kelloway, E.K, & Fraboni, M. (1994). Aspects of eldercare that place employees at risk. The Gerontologist, 34, 815–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregson, N. & Lowe, M. (1995). “Home”-making: on the spatiality of daily social reproduction in contemporary middle-class Britain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS20, 224–235.Google Scholar
Hallman, B.C. (1997) The spatiality of eldercare: Towards a gendered geography of the aging family. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Geography, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (1995). Gender, work and space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnston-Anumonwo, I. (1992). The influence of household type on gender differences in work-trip distance. Professional Geographer, 44, 161–d169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, A.E., & Hallman, B.C. (1996). Caught in the triangle: the influence of home, work and elder location on work-family balance. Canadian Journal on Aging, 15, 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, A.E., & Hallman, B.C. (1998). Over the hill and far away: distance as a barrier to the provision of assistance to elderly relatives. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 631–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, C., & Monk, J. (1993). Making connections: space, place and the life course. In Katz, C. & Monk, J. (Eds.), Full circles: Geographies of women over the life course (pp. 264–278). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaye, L.W., & Applegate, J.S. (1990). Men as caregivers to the elderly: Understanding and aiding unrecognized family support. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, A., Peake, L., Benenson, H., & Pickles, K. (1994). Introduction: placing women and work. In Kobayashi, A. (Ed.), Women, work and place (pp. xi–xlv). Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krout, J.A. (1988). The elderly in rural environments. Journal of Rural Studies, 4, 103–114.Google Scholar
Lee, G., Dwyer, J., & Coward, R. (1990). Residential location and proximity to children among impaired elderly parents. Rural Sociology, 55, 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwak, E., & Kulis, S. (1987). Technology, proximity and measures of kin support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin Matthews, A., & Keefe, J. (1995). Work and care of elderly people: A Canadian perspective. In Phillips, J. (Ed), Working carers: International perspectives on working and caring for older people (pp. 116–138). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Martin Matthews, A., & Rosenthal, C. (1993). Balancing work and family in an aging society: the Canadian experience. In Maddox, G. and Lawton, M. (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Focus on kinship, aging and social change (pp. 96–119). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, S.H., & Rosner, T.T. (1988). Shared filial responsibility: the family as the primary caregiver. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 185–195.Google Scholar
Roberto, K.A., & Skogland, R.R. (1996) Interactions with grandparents and great-grandparents: a comparison of activities, influences and relationships. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 43(2), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, G. (1993) Feminism in geography: The limits to geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schoonover, C.B., Brody, E., Hoffman, C., & Kleban, M.H. (1988). Parent care and geographically distant children. Research on Aging, 10, 472–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, M., & Litwak, E. (1993). A task-specific typology of intergenerational family structure in later life. The Gerontologist, 33, 258–264.Google Scholar
Stoller, E.P., Forster, L.E., & Duniho, T.S. (1992). Systems of parent care within sibling networks. Research on Aging, 14, 28–49.Google Scholar
Stueve, A., & O'Donnell, L. (1989). Interactions between women and their elderly parents. Research on Aging, 11, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar