Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:35:12.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rural-Urban Differences among Adult Day Care Participants in Manitoba

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Laurel A. Strain  and
Neena L. Chappell
Laurel A. Strain
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
Neena L. Chappell
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rural-urban differences in the characteristics of 44 individuals entering the province-wide Adult Day Care program throughout Manitoba are examined. In addition, the rural-urban differences along various social and social psychological indicators after participants have been in the program are explored. The results indicate that there are many similarities and relatively few differences between the urban and the rural ADC participants. Any differences which do emerge portray the rural participants as more socially integrated and with higher levels of perceived health than the urban participants. Implications for assessment for entry into Adult Day Care are discussed.

Résumé

La présente étude porte sur les différences observées entre la population urbaine et la population rurale du Manitoba. Ces différences ont, dans un premier temps, été étudiées d'après les caractéristiques de 44 sujets observés au moment de leur insertion dans le programme provincial de soins de jour aux adultes (ADC), et, dans un deuxième temps, d'après certains indices sociaux et psychologiques relevés après l'insertion dans le programme. Les résultats révèlent que les similitudes sont plus nombreuses que les différences. Ces dernières, lorsqu'elles existent, indiquent que les participants ruraux jouissent d'une meilleure intégration sociale et qu'ils s'estiment en meilleure santé que les participants urbains. L'étude est suivie d'une discussion des implications concernant l'évaluation des candidats au programme.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 197 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auerbach, A. J. The elderly in rural areas: differences in urban areas and implications for practice. In Ginsberg, L.H., (Ed.) Social Work in Rural Communities. New York: Council on Social Work Education, Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
Bultena, G.L.Rural-urban differences in the familial interaction of the aged. Rural Sociology, 1969, 34, 5–15.Google Scholar
Chappell, N.L.Who benefits from Adult Day Care: changes in functional ability and mental functioning during attendance. Canadian Journal on Aging, 1983, 2, 9–26.Google Scholar
Chappell., N.L. and Havens, B.Old and female: testing the double jeopardy hypothesis. The Sociological Quarterly, 1980, 21, 157–171.Google Scholar
Chappell, N.L. and Havens, B. Rural-urban differences among older women. Paper presented at the Midwest Sociological Society meetings, Minneapolis, April, 1981.Google Scholar
Chappell, N.L. And Strain, L. A. An evaluation of adult day care - phase I. Final Report submitted to Manitoba Health Services Commission, 1982.Google Scholar
Cumming, E. and Henry, W.E.Growing Old. New York: Basic Books, 1961.Google Scholar
Donnenwerth, G.B., Guy, R.F. and Norvell, M.J.Life satisfaction among older persons: rural-urban and racial comparisons. Social Science Quarterly, 1978, 59, 578–583.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.N. and Klemmack, D.L.Correlates of life satisfaction: a re-examination. Journal of Gerontology, 1973, 28, 497–502.Google Scholar
Ellenbogan, B.L. Health status of the rural aged. In Youmans, G., (Ed.), Older Rural Americans. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Eve, S.B.Older Americans' use of health maintenance organizations. Research on Aging, 1982, 4, 179–203.Google Scholar
Hampe, G.D., Blevins, A.L. and Nyhus, S.The influence of rural-urban residence and perceptions of health on retirement satisfaction. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Washington, November 1979.Google Scholar
Home Health Services Quarterly, 1980, 1, 3, 97–121.Google Scholar
Hynson, L.M.Rural-urban differences in satisfaction among the elderly. Rural Sociology, 1975, 40, 60–66.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. L., Goldfarb, A. I., Pollack, M. and Peck, A.Brief Objective Measures for the Determination of Mental Status in the Aged. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1960, 117, 326–328.Google Scholar
Kelman, H.R.The under development of evaluative research on health services for the elderly in the United States. International Journal of Health Services, 1980, 10, 501–511.Google Scholar
Kutner, B., Farnshel, D., Togo., A., and Langner, T.Five Hundred Over Sixty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1956.Google Scholar
Larson, R.Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 1978, 33, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, M.P., Nehemow, L. and Teaff, J.Housing characteristics and the well-being of elderly tenants in federally assisted housing. Journal of Gerontology, 1975, 30, 601–607.Google Scholar
Lee, G.R. and Lassey, M.L.Rural-urban differences among the elderly: economic, social and subjective factors. Journal of Social Issues, 1980, 36, 62–74.Google Scholar
Liang, J. and Warfel, B.L.Urbanism and life satisfaction among the aged. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Toronto, November, 1981.Google Scholar
Lozier, J. and Althouse, R.Retirement to the porch in rural Appalachia. Aging and Human Development, 1975, 6, 7–15.Google Scholar
Manitoba Department of Health. Continuing Care: Policy Guidelines and Program Manual. Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1983.Google Scholar
Manitoba Department of Health Community Services. Population of Manitoba by Health and Community Services Regions by Age Group and Sex. Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1979.Google Scholar
Manitoba Health Services Commission. In-house guideline on Adult Day Care. Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1979.Google Scholar
Neugarten, B.L., Havighurst, R.J. and Tobin, S.S.The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 1961, 16, 134–143.Google Scholar
Sauer, W.J., Shehan, C. and Boymel, C.Rural-urban differences in satisfaction among the elderly: a reconsideration. Rural Sociology, 1976, 41, 269–275.Google Scholar
Taietz, P. and Milton, S.Rural-urban differences in the structure of services for the elderly in upstate New York counties. Journal of Gerontology, 1974, 34, 429–437.Google Scholar
Wan, T.T.H., Weissert, W.G. and Livieratos, B.B.Geriatric day care and homemaker services: an experimental study. Journal of Gerontology, 1980, 35, 256–274.Google Scholar
Weissert, W.G.Adult day care programs in the United States: current research projects and a survey of 10 centers. Public Health Reports, 1977, 92, 49–56.Google Scholar
Wenger, G.C.Ageing in rural communities: family contacts and community integration. Ageing and Society, 1982, 2, 211–229.Google Scholar
Wirth, L.Urbanism as a way of life, American Journal of Sociology, 1938, XLIV, 1, 1–24.Google Scholar
Youmans, E.G.The rural aged. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1977, 429, 81–90.Google Scholar