Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T08:50:08.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Additive value of invasive haemodynamic assessment for predicting post-operative outcomes after Fontan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

Kathleen P. Wood*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Duke Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Kristin E. Bonello
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Sarah T. Plummer
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
Reid C. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Duke Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Greg A. Fleming
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Duke Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Michael G.W. Camitta
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Duke Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Kevin D. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Duke Pediatric and Congenital Heart Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
*
Corresponding author: K. P. Wood; Email: kathleen.p.wood@duke.edu

Abstract

Routine pre-Fontan cardiac catheterization remains standard practice at most centres. However, with advances in non-invasive risk assessment, an invasive haemodynamic assessment may not be necessary for all patients.

Using retrospective data from patients undergoing Fontan palliation at our institution, we developed a multivariable model to predict the likelihood of a composite adverse post-operative outcome including prolonged length of stay ≥ 30 days, hospital readmission within 6 months, and death and/or transplant within 6 months. Our baseline model included non-invasive risk factors obtained from clinical history and echocardiogram. We then incrementally incorporated invasive haemodynamic data to determine if these variables improved risk prediction.

Our baseline model correctly predicted favourable versus adverse post-Fontan outcomes in 118/174 (68%) patients. Covariates associated with adverse outcomes included the presence of a systemic right ventricle (adjusted adds ratio [aOR] 2.9; 95% CI 1.4, 5.8; p = 0.004), earlier surgical era (aOR 3.1 for era 1 vs 2; 95% CI 1.5, 6.5; p = 0.002), and performance of concomitant surgical procedures at the time of Fontan surgery (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1, 5.0; p = 0.026). Incremental addition of invasively acquired haemodynamic data did not improve model performance or percentage of outcomes predicted.

Invasively acquired haemodynamic data does not add substantially to non-invasive risk stratification in the majority of patients. Pre-Fontan catheterization may still be beneficial for angiographic evaluation of anatomy, for therapeutic intervention, and in select patients with equivocal risk stratification.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fontan, F, Mounicot, FB, Baudet, E, Simonneau, J, Gordo, J, Gouffrant, JM. [“Correction” of tricuspid atresia. 2 cases “corrected” using a new surgical technic]. Ann Chir Thorac Cardiovasc 1971; 10: 3947.Google ScholarPubMed
Vitiello, R, McCrindle, BW, Nykanen, D, Freedom, RM, Benson, LN. Complications associated with pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 14331440. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00396-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, EC. Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85: 11421146. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ro, PS, Rychik, J, Cohen, MS, Mahle, WT, Rome, JJ. Diagnostic assessment before Fontan operation in patients with bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis: are noninvasive methods sufficient? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 184187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prakash, A, Khan, MA, Hardy, R, Torres, AJ, Chen, JM, Gersony, WM. A new diagnostic algorithm for assessment of patients with single ventricle before a Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138: 917923. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banka, P, McElhinney, DB, Bacha, EA, et al. What is the clinical utility of routine cardiac catheterization before a Fontan operation? Pediatr Cardiol 2010; 31: 977985. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-010-9736-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogel, MA, Pawlowski, TW, Whitehead, KK, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance and the need for routine cardiac catheterization in single ventricle patients prior to Fontan: a comparison of 3 groups: pre-Fontan CMR versus cath evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 10941102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17: 368376. DOI: 10.1007/BF01734359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huelsenbeck, JP, Crandall, KA. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Ann Rev Ecol syst 1997; 28: 437466. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazzaniga, M, Fernández Pineda, L, Villagrá, F, et al. Operación modificada de Fontan o variantes efectuadas en un solo tiempo quirúrgico. Determinantes de la mortalidad [Single-stage Fontan procedure: early and late outcome in 124 patients]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2002; 55: 391412. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(02)76619-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofbeck, M, Singer, H, Scharf, J, et al. Die totale kavopulmonale anastomose: risikofaktoren und ergebnisse bei patienten unter 4 Jahren [Total cavopulmonary anastomosis: risk factors and results in patients under 4 years of age]. Z Kardiol 1994; 83: 615622.Google Scholar
Kaulitz, R, Ziemer, G, Luhmer, I, Kallfelz, HC. Modified Fontan operation in functionally univentricular hearts: preoperative risk factors and intermediate results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 658664. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70049-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosein, RB, Clarke, AJ, McGuirk, SP, et al. Factors influencing early and late outcome following the Fontan procedure in the current era. The ‘two commandments’? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31: 344352. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.11.043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biko, DM, DeWitt, AG, Pinto, EM, et al. MRI evaluation of lymphatic Abnormalities in the neck and thorax after Fontan surgery: relationship with outcome. Radiology 2019; 291: 774780. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019180877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollak, U, Abarbanel, I, Salem, Y, Serraf, AE, Mishaly, D. Dominant ventricular morphology and early postoperative course after the Fontan procedure. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2022; 13: 346352. DOI: 10.1177/21501351221081246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon, J, Shen, L, Likosky, DS, et al. Relationship of ventricular morphology and atrioventricular valve function to long-term outcomes following Fontan procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 419431. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponzoni, M, Azzolina, D, Vedovelli, L, et al. Ventricular morphology of single-ventricle hearts has a significant impact on outcomes after Fontan palliation: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 62: ezac535. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravishankar, C, Gerstenberger, E, Sleeper, LA, et al. Pediatric heart network investigators. Factors affecting Fontan length of stay: results from the single ventricle reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151: 669675.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, EH, Graham, G, Dearani, JA, Niaz, T, Cetta, F. Fontan palliation in patients with heterotaxy syndrome: a five decade experience. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2022; 13: 436442. DOI: 10.1177/21501351221099944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed